25-09-2024 | Obesity | Original Article
Prognostic Accuracy of Transient Elastography-Based Predictors in Diabetes and Obesity: A Multicenter International Cohort Study
Authors:
Venkata Sai Jayakrishna Jasty, Esteban Urias, Kai Le Ashley Tiong, Majd Bassam Aboona, Michael Song, Claire Faulkner, Pooja Devan, Jean Ee Neo, Karn Wijarnpreecha, Yu Jun Wong, Vincent Lingzhi Chen
Published in:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Login to get access
Abstract
Background/Aims
Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is recommended for risk stratification of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). More recently, AGILE3 + and AGILE4 have combined LSM with clinical parameters to identify patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. However, there are limited data on prognostic performance of these scores in key at-risk subgroups such as those with diabetes and obesity compared to LSM alone.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study including 1903 adult patients with NAFLD from tertiary care centers in the United States and Singapore undergoing VCTE between 2015 and 2022. Primary predictors were FAST, LSM, AGILE3 + , and AGILE4 scores and the primary outcome was liver-related events (LRE). Patients were further stratified by diabetes and obesity status. Prognostic performance was measured using the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (tAUC) at 5 years.
Results
In total, 25 LRE occurred and the overall incidence rate of LRE was 4.4 per 1000 person-years. tAUC for predicting LRE in the overall group was significantly higher with AGILE3 + (0.94 [95% CI: 0.90–0.98]) and AGILE4 (0.94 [95% CI: 0.90–0.98]) compared to LSM (0.87 [95% CI: 0.80–0.94]) (p = 0.001 and 0.009, respectively) and FAST (0.73 [95% CI: 0.59–0.86]) (p < 0.001 for both). Similarly, tAUC was significantly higher in those with T2D for AGILE3 + compared to LSM (0.92 vs 0.86, respectively) (p = 0.015) and FAST (0.92 vs 0.73, respectively) (p = 0.008). Among people with obesity, tAUC was significantly higher for AGILE3 + compared to LSM (0.95 vs 0.89, respectively) (p = 0.005) and FAST (0.95 vs 0.76, respectively) (p = 0.0035). Though AGILE4 had a higher tAUC in these subgroups compared to LSM, it did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion
AGILE3 + significantly outperforms LSM and FAST for predicting LRE in patients with NAFLD including in those with diabetes or obesity.