Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

01-03-2025 | Nerve Block | Review

Articaine buccal infiltration for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: is it as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine? a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Masoud Saatchi, Golshan Mohammadi, Pedram Iranmanesh, Abbasali Khademi, Alireza Farhad, Vivek Aggarwal, Jafar Kolahi

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2025

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration (BI) with 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the anesthetic efficiency of one cartridge of 4% articaine BI (as the primary injection) with one cartridge of 2% lidocaine IANB in permanent first mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were searched in five databases. The risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the RoB2 (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool). A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed using STATA software. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

Out of 780 records, five RCTs were included. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the success rates of articaine BI and lidocaine IANB [Risk ratio (RR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.93, 1.20), I2 = 24.51%)]. The certainty of the evidence was graded as “moderate”.

Conclusions

The moderate certainty of evidence suggests that the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine BI is comparable to 2% lidocaine IANB for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. However, more clinical trials are needed.

Clinical relevance

BI with 4% articaine for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis can be an alternative for clinicians compared with 2% lidocaine IANB.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Suresh A, Veettil SK, Bhatia S, Setzer FC (2019) Efficacy of local anaesthetic solutions on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int Endod J 52(6):779–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13072CrossRefPubMed Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Suresh A, Veettil SK, Bhatia S, Setzer FC (2019) Efficacy of local anaesthetic solutions on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int Endod J 52(6):779–789. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​iej.​13072CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Iwanaga J, Choi PJ, Vetter M, Patel M, Kikuta S, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS (2018) Anatomical Study of the Lingual Nerve and Inferior Alveolar Nerve in the Pterygomandibular Space: Complications of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block. Cureus 6;10(8):e3109. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3109 Iwanaga J, Choi PJ, Vetter M, Patel M, Kikuta S, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS (2018) Anatomical Study of the Lingual Nerve and Inferior Alveolar Nerve in the Pterygomandibular Space: Complications of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block. Cureus 6;10(8):e3109. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7759/​cureus.​3109
4.
go back to reference Malamed SF (2019) Handbook of local anesthesia, 7th edition. Elsevier health sciences Malamed SF (2019) Handbook of local anesthesia, 7th edition. Elsevier health sciences
10.
go back to reference Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, Indira R, Ramachandran S (2011) Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod 37(12):1603–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.009CrossRefPubMed Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, Indira R, Ramachandran S (2011) Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod 37(12):1603–1607. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​joen.​2011.​09.​009CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Subbiya A, Pradeepkumar AR, Vivekanandhan P, Karthick A (2011) Comparative efficacy evaluation of articaine as buccal infiltration and lignocaine as IANB in the mandibular first molar with irreversible pulpitis. Indian J Multidiscip Dent 2(1) Subbiya A, Pradeepkumar AR, Vivekanandhan P, Karthick A (2011) Comparative efficacy evaluation of articaine as buccal infiltration and lignocaine as IANB in the mandibular first molar with irreversible pulpitis. Indian J Multidiscip Dent 2(1)
12.
go back to reference Saberi EA, Farhadmollashahi N, Aliabadi T (2014) A Comparison of the Anesthesia Efficacy of Articaine and Articaine plus Morphine for Buccal Infiltration in Mandi bular Posterior Teeth with Irriversible Pulpitis. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 16(7) Saberi EA, Farhadmollashahi N, Aliabadi T (2014) A Comparison of the Anesthesia Efficacy of Articaine and Articaine plus Morphine for Buccal Infiltration in Mandi bular Posterior Teeth with Irriversible Pulpitis. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 16(7)
13.
go back to reference Rajput F, Katpar S, Shaikh MI, Khatoon S (2015) Evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine as buccal infiltration vs 2% lidocaine as ianb in the mandibular 1st molar with irreversible pulpitis. Pak Oral Dent J 35(1) Rajput F, Katpar S, Shaikh MI, Khatoon S (2015) Evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine as buccal infiltration vs 2% lidocaine as ianb in the mandibular 1st molar with irreversible pulpitis. Pak Oral Dent J 35(1)
14.
go back to reference Zain M, Khattak SUR, Sikandar H, Shah SA (2016) Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine primary buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in symptomatic mandibular first molar teeth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 26(1):4–9PubMed Zain M, Khattak SUR, Sikandar H, Shah SA (2016) Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine primary buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in symptomatic mandibular first molar teeth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 26(1):4–9PubMed
15.
go back to reference Monteiro MR, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F, Volpato MC, Almeida JF (2015) 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for emergency root canal treatment in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits: a randomized clinical study. Int Endod J 48(2):145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12293CrossRefPubMed Monteiro MR, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F, Volpato MC, Almeida JF (2015) 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for emergency root canal treatment in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits: a randomized clinical study. Int Endod J 48(2):145–152. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​iej.​12293CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C (2009) Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive–trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol 38(1):287–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn188CrossRefPubMed Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C (2009) Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive–trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol 38(1):287–298. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ije/​dyn188CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds) (2019) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK) Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds) (2019) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK)
19.
go back to reference Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow,C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville,J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson,E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A.,… Moher, D. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement:an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow,C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville,J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson,E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A.,… Moher, D. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement:an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​n71
22.
go back to reference Berman LH, Hargreaves KM (2020) Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp-E-Book, 12th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences Berman LH, Hargreaves KM (2020) Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp-E-Book, 12th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences
23.
go back to reference Rotstein I, Ingle JI (2019) Ingle’s endodontics, 12th edition. PMPH USA Rotstein I, Ingle JI (2019) Ingle’s endodontics, 12th edition. PMPH USA
24.
go back to reference Torabinejad M, Fouad AF, Shabahang S (2020) Endodontics: principles and practice. 6th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences Torabinejad M, Fouad AF, Shabahang S (2020) Endodontics: principles and practice. 6th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences
25.
go back to reference Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366(l4898). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366(l4898). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​l4898
26.
go back to reference Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG (2023) Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG (2023) Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane. Available from www.​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook
27.
go back to reference Vatankhah M, Zargar N, Naseri M, Sadeghi S, Baghban AA, Dianat O, Nusstein JM (2023) Primary and supplementary anesthetic efficacy of a modified two-step buccal infiltration of 4% articaine in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 28(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05417-0CrossRefPubMed Vatankhah M, Zargar N, Naseri M, Sadeghi S, Baghban AA, Dianat O, Nusstein JM (2023) Primary and supplementary anesthetic efficacy of a modified two-step buccal infiltration of 4% articaine in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 28(1):33. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00784-023-05417-0CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Iranmanesh P, Khazaei S, Nili M, Saatchi M, Aggarwal V, Kolahi J, Khademi A (2022) Anaesthetic efficacy of incorporating different additives into lidocaine for the inferior alveolar nerve block: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Int Endod J 55(7):732–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13746CrossRefPubMed Iranmanesh P, Khazaei S, Nili M, Saatchi M, Aggarwal V, Kolahi J, Khademi A (2022) Anaesthetic efficacy of incorporating different additives into lidocaine for the inferior alveolar nerve block: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Int Endod J 55(7):732–747. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​iej.​13746CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Nagendrababu V, Abbott PV, Pulikkotil SJ, Veettil SK, Dummer PMH (2021) Comparing the anaesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of anaesthetic solution for inferior alveolar nerve blocks for teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Int Endod J 54(3):331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13428CrossRefPubMed Nagendrababu V, Abbott PV, Pulikkotil SJ, Veettil SK, Dummer PMH (2021) Comparing the anaesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of anaesthetic solution for inferior alveolar nerve blocks for teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Int Endod J 54(3):331–342. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​iej.​13428CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Khademi A, Iranmanesh P, Mosayebi N, Heydari M, Bagherieh S (2023) Effect of premedication on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis: an umbrella review. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 20:75CrossRefPubMed Khademi A, Iranmanesh P, Mosayebi N, Heydari M, Bagherieh S (2023) Effect of premedication on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis: an umbrella review. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 20:75CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Mendoza C, Kraemer P, Herrera P, Burdiles P, Sepúlveda D, Núñez E, Muñoz C, Neumann I (2017) Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE [Clinical guidelines using the GRADE system (grading of recommendations Assessment, Development and evaluation)]. Rev Med Chil 145(11):1463–1470. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872017001101463CrossRefPubMed Mendoza C, Kraemer P, Herrera P, Burdiles P, Sepúlveda D, Núñez E, Muñoz C, Neumann I (2017) Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE [Clinical guidelines using the GRADE system (grading of recommendations Assessment, Development and evaluation)]. Rev Med Chil 145(11):1463–1470. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4067/​s0034-9887201700110146​3CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Tricca F, Tari SR, Benedicenti S, Gehrke SA, Inchingolo F, Scarano A (2022) Needle breakage during inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia: a review. Ann Stomatol 2(3) Tricca F, Tari SR, Benedicenti S, Gehrke SA, Inchingolo F, Scarano A (2022) Needle breakage during inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia: a review. Ann Stomatol 2(3)
Metadata
Title
Articaine buccal infiltration for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: is it as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine? a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Masoud Saatchi
Golshan Mohammadi
Pedram Iranmanesh
Abbasali Khademi
Alireza Farhad
Vivek Aggarwal
Jafar Kolahi
Publication date
01-03-2025
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Nerve Block
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2025
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06229-0