Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

14-07-2024 | Original Research Article

Measuring and Understanding Market Exclusivity Length for New Prescription Drugs in France, Australia, and the USA

Authors: Victor L. Van de Wiele, Aaron S. Kesselheim, Deborah Gleeson, Zhigang Lu, Sean S. Tu, Benjamin N. Rome

Published in: Pharmaceutical Medicine | Issue 4/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Originator drug manufacturers use several strategies to delay generic competition in the USA, but it remains unclear whether this results in longer market exclusivity compared to other countries.

Objectives

We sought to understand how drug market exclusivity lengths vary between the USA and two comparable countries.

Methods

We focused on drugs approved within 2 years of each other in the USA, France, and Australia from 1995 to 2005, and we compared the lengths of exclusivity from marketing approval through first generic competition or June 2023 using Kaplan–Meier analyses.

Results

Among 165 drugs in common between the USA and France, the median length of exclusivity was slightly longer in France (15.0 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 13.0–19.6) than the USA (14.5 years, IQR: 11.7–17.6). Among 100 drugs in common between the USA and Australia, the median length of exclusivity was longer in Australia (16.3 years, IQR: 13.9–22.4) than in the USA (14.4 years, IQR: 12.0–17.1).

Conclusions

Market exclusivity lengths in the USA are not longer than in France and Australia. Potential reasons include the larger US market and incentives that offer transient high generic drug prices in the USA for manufacturers that successfully challenge originator market exclusivity.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rome BN, Lee CC, Kesselheim AS. Market exclusivity length for drugs with new generic or biosimilar competition, 2012–2018. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109:367–71.CrossRefPubMed Rome BN, Lee CC, Kesselheim AS. Market exclusivity length for drugs with new generic or biosimilar competition, 2012–2018. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109:367–71.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dave CV, Hartzema A, Kesselheim AS. Prices of generic drugs associated with numbers of manufacturers. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2597–8.CrossRefPubMed Dave CV, Hartzema A, Kesselheim AS. Prices of generic drugs associated with numbers of manufacturers. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2597–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Van de Wiele VL, Torrance AW, Kesselheim AS. Characteristics of key patents covering recent FDA-approved drugs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41:1117–24.CrossRefPubMed Van de Wiele VL, Torrance AW, Kesselheim AS. Characteristics of key patents covering recent FDA-approved drugs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41:1117–24.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rome BN, Gagne JJ, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. Non-warfarin oral anticoagulant copayments and adherence in atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study. Am Heart J. 2021;233:109–21.CrossRefPubMed Rome BN, Gagne JJ, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. Non-warfarin oral anticoagulant copayments and adherence in atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study. Am Heart J. 2021;233:109–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. 910 F.Supp.2d. 299. December 2012. Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. 910 F.Supp.2d. 299. December 2012.
8.
go back to reference Costa-Font J, McGuire A, Varol N. Price regulation and relative delays in generic drug adoption. J Health Econ. 2014;38:1–9.CrossRefPubMed Costa-Font J, McGuire A, Varol N. Price regulation and relative delays in generic drug adoption. J Health Econ. 2014;38:1–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Son KB, Lopert R, Glesson D, et al. Moderating the impact of patent linkage on access to medicines: lessons from variations in South Korea, Australia, Canada, and the United States. Global Health. 2018;14(1):1–11. Son KB, Lopert R, Glesson D, et al. Moderating the impact of patent linkage on access to medicines: lessons from variations in South Korea, Australia, Canada, and the United States. Global Health. 2018;14(1):1–11.
11.
go back to reference Darrow JJ, Kesselheim AS. Drug development and FDA approval, 1938–2013. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26): e39.CrossRefPubMed Darrow JJ, Kesselheim AS. Drug development and FDA approval, 1938–2013. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26): e39.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mellish L, Karanges EA, Litchfield MJ, et al. The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data collection: a practical guide for researchers. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:634.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mellish L, Karanges EA, Litchfield MJ, et al. The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data collection: a practical guide for researchers. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:634.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Mistry R, Maheshwari D. Regulatory exclusivity strategies: further protection for pharmaceuticals in US, Europe and Canada. J Glob Trends Pharm Sci. 2015;6:2300–10. Mistry R, Maheshwari D. Regulatory exclusivity strategies: further protection for pharmaceuticals in US, Europe and Canada. J Glob Trends Pharm Sci. 2015;6:2300–10.
22.
go back to reference Tsuji K, Tsutani K. Approval of new drugs 1999–2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010;35(3):289–301.CrossRefPubMed Tsuji K, Tsutani K. Approval of new drugs 1999–2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010;35(3):289–301.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kessler DA, Hass AE, Feiden KL, Lumpkin M, Temple R. Approval of new drugs in the United States: comparison with the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan. JAMA. 1996;276(22):1826–31.CrossRefPubMed Kessler DA, Hass AE, Feiden KL, Lumpkin M, Temple R. Approval of new drugs in the United States: comparison with the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan. JAMA. 1996;276(22):1826–31.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Downing NS, Zhang AD, Ross JS. Regulatory review of new therapeutic agents: FDA versus EMA, 2011–2015. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1386–7.CrossRefPubMed Downing NS, Zhang AD, Ross JS. Regulatory review of new therapeutic agents: FDA versus EMA, 2011–2015. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1386–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bloomfield D, Lu Z, Kesselheim AS. Improving the quality of US drug patents through international awareness. BMJ. 2022;377: e068172.CrossRefPubMed Bloomfield D, Lu Z, Kesselheim AS. Improving the quality of US drug patents through international awareness. BMJ. 2022;377: e068172.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Note, Crestor generics entered the market even later due to patent litigation, see Re Rosuvastatin Calcium Litigation (Fed. Cir. 2012). Note, Crestor generics entered the market even later due to patent litigation, see Re Rosuvastatin Calcium Litigation (Fed. Cir. 2012).
28.
go back to reference In Re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation. 2012. 703 F.3d 511. In Re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation. 2012. 703 F.3d 511.
29.
go back to reference Vokinger KN, Kesselheim AS, Avorn J, Sarpatwari A. Strategies that delay market entry of generic drugs. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1665–9.CrossRefPubMed Vokinger KN, Kesselheim AS, Avorn J, Sarpatwari A. Strategies that delay market entry of generic drugs. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1665–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Luo J, Seeger JD, Donneyong M, et al. Effect of generic competition on atorvastatin prescribing and patients’ out-of-pocket spending. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1317–23.CrossRefPubMed Luo J, Seeger JD, Donneyong M, et al. Effect of generic competition on atorvastatin prescribing and patients’ out-of-pocket spending. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1317–23.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Van de Wiele VL, Darrow JJ, Kesselheim AS. No parking here: a review of generic drug 180-day exclusivity and recent reform proposals. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2021;20:131. Van de Wiele VL, Darrow JJ, Kesselheim AS. No parking here: a review of generic drug 180-day exclusivity and recent reform proposals. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2021;20:131.
33.
go back to reference Grabowski H, Long G, Mortimer R. Recent trends in brand-name and generic drug competition. J Med Econ. 2014;17:207–14.CrossRefPubMed Grabowski H, Long G, Mortimer R. Recent trends in brand-name and generic drug competition. J Med Econ. 2014;17:207–14.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Van de Wiele VL, Kesselheim AS, Sarpatwari A. Barriers to US biosimilar market growth: lessons from biosimilar patent litigation [published correction appears in Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Oct; 40(10):1671]. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021;40(8):1198–205.PubMed Van de Wiele VL, Kesselheim AS, Sarpatwari A. Barriers to US biosimilar market growth: lessons from biosimilar patent litigation [published correction appears in Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Oct; 40(10):1671]. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021;40(8):1198–205.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Rome BN, Kesselheim AS. Biosimilar competition for Humira is here: signs of hope despite early hiccups. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75(8):1325–7.CrossRefPubMed Rome BN, Kesselheim AS. Biosimilar competition for Humira is here: signs of hope despite early hiccups. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75(8):1325–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Measuring and Understanding Market Exclusivity Length for New Prescription Drugs in France, Australia, and the USA
Authors
Victor L. Van de Wiele
Aaron S. Kesselheim
Deborah Gleeson
Zhigang Lu
Sean S. Tu
Benjamin N. Rome
Publication date
14-07-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Pharmaceutical Medicine / Issue 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1178-2595
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1993
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-024-00527-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2024

Pharmaceutical Medicine 4/2024 Go to the issue