Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Internal Medicine Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Surgery
Congress Coverage
2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keynote Webinar | Spotlight on Diet and Diabetes

Watch on-demand

An expert-led symposium exploring the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes through dietary interventions. 
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology

Open Access 22-09-2023 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Review

Membranous urethral length measurement on preoperative MRI to predict incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a literature review towards a proposal for measurement standardization

Authors: Thierry N. Boellaard, Margriet C. van Dijk-de Haan, Stijn W. T. P. J. Heijmink, Corinne N. Tillier, Hans Veerman, Laura S. Mertens, Henk G. van der Poel, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Ivo G. Schoots

Published in: European Radiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the membranous urethral length (MUL) measurement and its interobserver agreement, and propose literature-based recommendations to standardize MUL measurement for increasing interobserver agreement. MUL measurements based on prostate MRI scans, for urinary incontinence risk assessment before radical prostatectomy (RP), may influence treatment decision-making in men with localised prostate cancer. Before implementation in clinical practise, MRI-based MUL measurements need standardization to improve observer agreement.

Methods

Online libraries were searched up to August 5, 2022, on MUL measurements. Two reviewers performed article selection and critical appraisal. Papers reporting on preoperative MUL measurements and urinary continence correlation were selected. Extracted information included measuring procedures, MRI sequences, population mean/median values, and observer agreement.

Results

Fifty papers were included. Studies that specified the MRI sequence used T2-weighted images and used either coronal images (n = 13), sagittal images (n = 18), or both (n = 12) for MUL measurements. ‘Prostatic apex’ was the most common description of the proximal membranous urethra landmark and ‘level/entry of the urethra into the penile bulb’ was the most common description of the distal landmark. Population mean (median) MUL value range was 10.4–17.1 mm (7.3–17.3 mm), suggesting either population or measurement differences. Detailed measurement technique descriptions for reproducibility were lacking. Recommendations on MRI-based MUL measurement were formulated by using anatomical landmarks and detailed descriptions and illustrations.

Conclusions

In order to improve on measurement variability, a literature-based measuring method of the MUL was proposed, supported by several illustrative case studies, in an attempt to standardize MRI-based MUL measurements for appropriate urinary incontinence risk preoperatively.

Clinical relevance statement

Implementation of MUL measurements into clinical practise for personalized post-prostatectomy continence prediction is hampered by lack of standardization and suboptimal interobserver agreement. Our proposed standardized MUL measurement aims to facilitate standardization and to improve the interobserver agreement.

Key Points

• Variable approaches for membranous urethral length measurement are being used, without detailed description and with substantial differences in length of the membranous urethra, hampering standardization.
• Limited interobserver agreement for membranous urethral length measurement was observed in several studies, while preoperative incontinence risk assessment necessitates high interobserver agreement.
• Literature-based recommendations are proposed to standardize MRI-based membranous urethral length measurement for increasing interobserver agreement and improving preoperative incontinence risk assessment, using anatomical landmarks on sagittal T2-weighted images.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 update. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 79:243–262 PubMedCrossRef
2.
Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM et al (2017) Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA 317:1141–1150 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Tillier CN, Vromans RD, Boekhout AH et al (2021) Individual risk prediction of urinary incontinence after prostatectomy and impact on treatment choice in patients with localized prostate cancer. Neurourol Urodyn 40:1550–1558 PubMedCrossRef
4.
Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA et al (2022) Patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 8:674–689 PubMedCrossRef
5.
Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer RM, Sandhu J, De Ridder D, Stenzl A (2017) Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: a review. Eur Urol 71:936–944 PubMedCrossRef
6.
van Dijk-de Haan MC, Boellaard TN, Tissier R et al (2022) Value of different magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of anatomical structures on preoperative prostate imaging in predicting urinary continence after radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 8:1211–1225 PubMedCrossRef
7.
Mungovan SF, Sandhu JS, Akin O, Smart NA, Graham PL, Patel MI (2017) Preoperative membranous urethral length measurement and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 71:368–378 PubMedCrossRef
8.
Grivas N, van der Roest R, Schouten D et al (2018) Quantitative assessment of fascia preservation improves the prediction of membranous urethral length and inner levator distance on continence outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Neurourol Urodyn 37:417–425 PubMedCrossRef
9.
Park S, Byun J (2021) A study of predictive models for early outcomes of post-prostatectomy incontinence: machine learning approach vs. logistic regression analysis approach. Appl Sci 11:6225 CrossRef
10.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Veerman H, Hagens M, Hoeks C et al (2022) A standardized method to measure the membranous urethral length (MUL) on MRI of the prostate with high inter- and intra-observer agreement. Eur Radiol 33:3295–3302 PubMedCrossRef
12.
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351 PubMedCrossRef
13.
Koraitim MM (2008) The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: an anatomical concept and its physiological correlate. J Urol 179:1683–1689 PubMedCrossRef
14.
Basourakos SP, Ramaswamy A, Yu M, Margolis DJ, Hu JC (2021) Racial variation in membranous urethral length and postprostatectomy urinary function. Eur Urol Open Sci 27:61–64 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Lee SE, Byun SS, Lee HJ et al (2006) Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 68:137–141 PubMedCrossRef
16.
Lee H, Kim K, Hwang SI et al (2014) Impact of prostatic apical shape and protrusion on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology 84:844–849 PubMedCrossRef
17.
Cho DS, Lee EJ, Kim SJ, Kim SI (2015) The influence of membranous stretched urethral length and urethral circumference on postoperative recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Can Urol Assoc J 9:E262–E266 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Choi SK, Park S, Ahn H (2015) Randomized clinical trial of a bladder neck plication stitch during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Asian J Androl 17:304–308 PubMedCrossRef
19.
Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW, Wei DC, Scardino PT, Hricak H (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168:1032–1035 PubMedCrossRef
20.
Fukui S, Kagebayashi Y, Iemura Y, Matsumura Y, Samma S (2019) Preoperative MRI parameters predict urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in prostatic cancer patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 9:102 PubMedCrossRef
21.
Greenberg SA, Cowan JE, Lonergan PE et al (2022) The effect of preoperative membranous urethral length on likelihood of postoperative urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 25:344–350 PubMedCrossRef
22.
Grivas N, van der Roest R, Tillier C et al (2017) Patterns of benign prostate hyperplasia based on magnetic resonance imaging are correlated with lower urinary tract symptoms and continence in men undergoing a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 107:196–201 PubMedCrossRef
23.
Hakimi AA, Faleck DM, Agalliu I, Rozenblit AM, Chernyak V, Ghavamian R (2011) Preoperative and intraoperative measurements of urethral length as predictors of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25:1025–1030 PubMedCrossRef
24.
Hikita K, Honda M, Teraoka S et al (2019) Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence in men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Neurourol Urodyn 38:S374–S375
25.
Hoeh B, Wenzel M, Muller M et al (2022) Urethral sphincter length but not prostatic apex shape in preoperative MRI is associated with mid-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 12:701 PubMedCrossRef
26.
Hong SK, Lee ST, Kim SS et al (2009) Effect of bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 104:664–668 PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
Ikarashi D, Kato Y, Kanehira M et al (2018) Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Surg Oncol 16:224 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Jeong SJ, Kim HJ, Kim JH et al (2012) Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: predictive factors of recovery after 1 year of surgery. Int J Urol 19:1091–1098 PubMedCrossRef
30.
Jeong CW, Oh JJ, Jeong SJ et al (2013) Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 1:383–388 CrossRef
31.
Jeong SJ, Yeon JS, Lee JK et al (2014) Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence. World J Urol 32:437–444 PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kadono Y, Ueno S, Kadomoto S et al (2016) Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 35:1034–1039 PubMedCrossRef
33.
Kim SC, Song C, Kim W et al (2011) Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Eur Urol 60:413–419 PubMedCrossRef
34.
Kim LHC, Patel A, Kinsella N, Sharabiani MTA, Ap Dafydd D, Cahill D (2019) Association between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging–based urethral parameters and continence recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 6:1013–1020 PubMedCrossRef
35.
Kim M, Park M, Pak S et al (2019) Integrity of the urethral sphincter complex, nerve-sparing, and long-term continence status after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 5:823–830 PubMedCrossRef
36.
Kitamura K, China T, Kanayama M et al (2019) Significant association between urethral length measured by magnetic resonance imaging and urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Int 7:54–59 PubMedCrossRef
37.
Ko YH, Huynh LM, See K, Lall C, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE (2020) Impact of surgically maximized versus native membranous urethral length on 30-day and long-term pad-free continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Int 8:55–61 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Kohjimoto Y, Yamashita S, Kikkawa K, Iba A, Matsumura N, Hara I (2020) The association of length of the resected membranous urethra with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urol J 17:146–151 PubMed
39.
Lamberg H, Shankar PR, Singh K et al (2022) Preoperative prostate MRI predictors of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy. Radiology 303:99–109 PubMedCrossRef
40.
Lee S, Yoon CJ, Park HJ, Lee JZ, Ha HK (2013) The surgical procedure is the most important factor affecting continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Men’s Health 31:163–169 CrossRef
41.
Lee YJ, Jung JW, Lee S et al (2020) Contemporary trends in radical prostatectomy and predictors of recovery of urinary continence in men aged over 70 years: comparisons between cohorts aged over 70 and less than 70 years. Asian J Androl 22:280–286 PubMedCrossRef
42.
Li Y, Li W, Lu W et al (2020) Association of preoperative urethral parameters on magnetic resonance imaging and immediate recovery of continence following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Transl Androl Urol 9:501–509 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Lim TJ, Lee JH, Lim JW, Moon SK, Jeon SH, Chang SG (2012) Preoperative factors predictive of continence recovery after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Korean J Urol 53:524–530 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Lin D, O’Callaghan M, David R et al (2020) Does urethral length affect continence outcomes following robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP)? BMC Urol 20:8 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Matsushita K, Kent MT, Vickers AJ et al (2015) Preoperative predictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 116:577–583 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Mendoza PJ, Stern JM, Li AY et al (2011) Pelvic anatomy on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can predict early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25:51–55 PubMedCrossRef
47.
Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A (2008) Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 179:1907–11 PubMedCrossRef
48.
Onishi T, Sekito S, Terabe T, Shibahara T (2018) A combination of findings obtained from pre- and postoperative imaging predict recovery of urinary continence after non-nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Anticancer Res 38:5525–5530 PubMedCrossRef
49.
Ota Y, Hamamoto S, Matsuyama N et al (2021) Pelvic anatomical features after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy intended for early recovery of urinary symptoms. J Endourol 35:296–304 PubMedCrossRef
50.
Oza P, Walker NF, Rottenberg G et al (2022) Pre-prostatectomy membranous urethral length as a predictive factor of post prostatectomy incontinence requiring surgical intervention with an artificial urinary sphincter or a male sling. Neurourol Urodyn 41:973–979 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS et al (2009) Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol 55:629–639 PubMedCrossRef
52.
Regis L, Salazar A, Cuadras M et al (2019) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting early continence recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 43:137–142 PubMedCrossRef
53.
Sadahira T, Mitsui Y, Araki M et al (2019) Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging parameters predict urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Lower Urin Tract Symptoms 11:122–6 CrossRef
54.
Sauer M, Tennstedt P, Berliner C et al (2019) Predictors of short and long term urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy in prostate MRI: significance and reliability of standardized measurements. Eur J Radiol 120:108668 PubMedCrossRef
55.
Schmid FA, Wettstein MS, Kessler TM et al (2019) Contrast media kinetics in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before radical prostatectomy predicts the probability of postoperative incontinence. World J Urol 38:1741–1748 PubMedCrossRef
56.
57.
Song W, Kim CK, Park BK et al (2017) Impact of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length measured by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 11:E93–E99 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Tienza A, Robles JE, Hevia M, Algarra R, Diez-Caballero F, Pascual JI (2018) Prevalence analysis of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy and influential preoperative factors in a single institution. Aging Male 21:24–30 PubMedCrossRef
59.
Tutolo M, Rosiello G, Stabile G et al (2022) The key role of levator ani thickness for early urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Neurourol Urodyn 41:1563–1572 PubMedCrossRef
60.
Von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Savage C et al (2012) Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 187:945–950 CrossRef
61.
Wenzel M, Preisser F, Mueller M et al (2021) Effect of prostatic apex shape (Lee types) and urethral sphincter length in preoperative MRI on very early continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 53:1297–1303 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Yang B, Zhang F, Xiao C, Lu J, Ma L, Huang Y (2020) Impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging anatomic features on urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 104:239–246 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Membranous urethral length measurement on preoperative MRI to predict incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a literature review towards a proposal for measurement standardization
Authors
Thierry N. Boellaard
Margriet C. van Dijk-de Haan
Stijn W. T. P. J. Heijmink
Corinne N. Tillier
Hans Veerman
Laura S. Mertens
Henk G. van der Poel
Pim J. van Leeuwen
Ivo G. Schoots
Publication date
22-09-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10180-7