Adequacy of training in dementia care for acute hospital staff
Intended for healthcare professionals
A&S Science Previous     Next

Adequacy of training in dementia care for acute hospital staff

Aarti Gandesha Deputy programme manager, Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Centre for Quality Improvement, London
Renata Souza Project worker, Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Centre for Quality Improvement, London
Robert Chaplin Research fellow, Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Centre for Quality Improvement, London
Chloë Hood Programme manager, Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Centre for Quality Improvement, London

Aarti Gandesha and colleagues present the results of a national audit to assess how hospital staff from different specialties rated their awareness of the needs of patients with dementia

People with dementia are frequently admitted to general wards where their dementia is often unrecognised and related healthcare needs are unaddressed. This article examines how staff view the training they have received in assessing and caring for people with dementia who are admitted to hospital. It reports on the results of the National Audit of Dementia (Care in General Hospitals); staff completed questionnaires reporting the sufficiency of their training in 13 main areas related to dementia care.

Responses were obtained from 270 doctors, 968 qualified nurses and 541 healthcare assistants (HCAs); 690 worked on medical wards, 677 on surgical/orthopaedic wards and 412 on care of older people wards. Doctors felt more adequately trained than nurses or HCAs. Nurses on medical and surgical/orthopaedic wards thought their training was less sufficient than their colleagues working on care of older people wards.

The authors conclude that nurses and HCAs working on wards not specialising in the care of older people should receive increased training in dementia care.

Nursing Older People. 24, 4, 26-31. doi: 10.7748/nop2012.05.24.4.26.c9070

Correspondence

rchaplin@cru.rcpsych.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more