Force in mental health services: international user and survivor perspectives
Intended for healthcare professionals
General Previous     Next

Force in mental health services: international user and survivor perspectives

Mary O’Hagan Service user and commissioner, New Zealand Mental Health Commission

Are mental health services legally justified in using force on some people diagnosed with a mental disorder who have not committed a crime? The opinions of users and survivors on this topic have traditionally been marginalised. In a two-part article, Mary O’Hagan looks first at the perspectives of users, before examining how the use of force might be reduced or dispensed with entirely

It is clear that users and survivors are demanding less or no force. This should compel legislators, bureaucrats and providers to consider how to reduce or end the use of force in mental health services. The ultimate way to do this is through the long and labyrinthine process of legislative reform. However, in the meantime there are many opportunities for the people who design, fund, monitor and run mental health services to discourage the use of force.

Mental Health Practice. 7, 5, 12-17. doi: 10.7748/mhp2004.02.7.5.12.c1787

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more