Treatment of Ischial Pressure Sores with Both Profunda Femoris Artery Perforator Flaps and Muscle Flaps

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background Reconstruction of ischial pressure sore defects is challenging due to extensive bursas and high recurrence rates. In this study, we simultaneously applied a muscle flap that covered the exposed ischium and large bursa with sufficient muscular volume and a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap for the management of ischial pressure sores.

Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 14 patients (16 ischial sores) whose ischial defects had been reconstructed using both a profunda femoris artery perforator flap and a muscle flap between January 2006 and February 2014. We compared patient characteristics, operative procedure, and clinical course.

Results All flaps survived the entire follow-up period. Seven patients (50%) had a history of surgery at the site of the ischial pressure sore. The mean age of the patients included was 52.8 years (range, 18-85 years). The mean follow-up period was 27.9 months (range, 3-57 months). In two patients, a biceps femoris muscle flap was used, while a gracilis muscle flap was used in the remaining patients. In four cases (25%), wound dehiscence occurred, but healed without further complication after resuturing. Additionally, congestion occurred in one case (6%), but resolved with conservative treatment. Among 16 cases, there was only one (6%) recurrence at 34 months.

Conclusions The combination of a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and muscle flap for the treatment of ischial pressure sores provided pliability, adequate bulkiness and few long-term complications. Therefore, this may be used as an alternative treatment method for ischial pressure sores.

The authors would like to thank Dong-Su Jang, MFA, (Medical Illustrator, Seoul, Korea) for his help with the illustrations.

Publication History

Received: 29 April 2014

Accepted: 30 May 2014

Article published online:
05 May 2022

© 2014. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Bass MJ, Phillips LG. Pressure sores. Curr Probl Surg 2007; 44: 101-143
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Lee SS, Huang SH, Chen MC. et al. Management of recurrent ischial pressure sore with gracilis muscle flap and V-Y profunda femoris artery perforator-based flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 1339-1346
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Keys KA, Daniali LN, Warner KJ. et al. Multivariate predictors of failure after flap coverage of pressure ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1725-1734
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hentz VR. Management of pressure sores in a specialty center. A reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64: 683-691
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Tavakoli K, Rutkowski S, Cope C. et al. Recurrence rates of ischial sores in para- and tetraplegics treated with hamstring flaps: an 8-year study. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52: 476-479
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kierney PC, Engrav LH, Isik FF. et al. Results of 268 pressure sores in 158 patients managed jointly by plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 765-772
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Higgins JP, Orlando GS, Blondeel PN. Ischial pressure sore reconstruction using an inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55: 83-85
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S. et al. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 678-683
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Coşkunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE. Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 2012-2017
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ahmadzadeh R, Bergeron L, Tang M. et al. The posterior thigh perforator flap or profunda femoris artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 194-200
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Angrigiani C, Grilli D, Siebert J. et al. A new musculocutaneous island flap from the distal thigh for recurrent ischial and perineal pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96: 935-940
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Saad A, Sadeghi A, Allen RJ. The anatomic basis of the profunda femoris artery perforator flap: a new option for autologous breast reconstruction--a cadaveric and computer tomography angiogram study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28: 381-386
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Homma K, Murakami G, Fujioka H. et al. Treatment of ischial pressure ulcers with a posteromedial thigh fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1990-1996
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Angrigiani C, Grilli D, Thorne CH. The adductor flap: a new method for transferring posterior and medial thigh skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 1725-1731
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Thiessen FE, Andrades P, Blondeel PN. et al. Flap surgery for pressure sores: should the underlying muscle be transferred or not?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 84-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Cushing CA, Phillips LG. Evidence-based medicine: pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 1720-1732
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Lin PY, Kuo YR, Tsai YT. A reusable perforator-preserving gluteal artery-based rotation fasciocutaneous flap for pressure sore reconstruction. Microsurgery 2012; 32: 189-195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Unal C, Ozdemir J, Yirmibesoglu O. et al. Use of inferior gluteal artery and posterior thigh perforators in management of ischial pressure sores with limited donor sites for flap coverage. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69: 67-72
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kim YS, Lew DH, Roh TS. et al. Inferior gluteal artery perforator flap: a viable alternative for ischial pressure sores. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 1347-1354
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Baek SM. Two new cutaneous free flaps: the medial and lateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 354-365
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hurwitz ZM, Montilla R, Dunn RM. et al. Adductor magnus perforator flap revisited: an anatomical review and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66: 438-443
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hallock GG. The propeller flap version of the adductor muscle perforator flap for coverage of ischial or trochanteric pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56: 540-542
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Labandter HP. The gracilis muscle flap and musculocutaneous flap in the repair of perineal and ischial defects. Br J Plast Surg 1980; 33: 95-98
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Wong CH, Tan BK, Song C. The perforator-sparing buttock rotation flap for coverage of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1259-1266
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Sameem M, Au M, Wood T. et al. A systematic review of complication and recurrence rates of musculocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, and perforator-based flaps for treatment of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 67e-77e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar