Correction of Congenital Auricular Deformities Using the Ear-Molding Technique

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background Studies of the ear-molding technique have emphasized the importance of initiating molding early to achieve the best results. In the present study, we describe the immediate effects and long-term outcomes of this technique, focusing on children who were older than the ideal age of treatment initiation.

Methods Patients who visited our institution from July 2014 to November 2015 were included. Medical charts were reviewed to collect data on demographics, the duration of treatment, the types of deformities, and the manner of recognition of the deformity and referral to our institution. Parents were surveyed to assess the degree of improvement, the level of procedural discomfort at the end of treatment, any changes in the shape of the molded auricle, and overall satisfaction 12 months after their last follow-up visits.

Results A review of 28 ears in 18 patients was conducted, including the following types of deformities: constricted ear (64.2%), Stahl ear (21.4%), prominent ear (7.1%), and cryptotia (7.1%). The average score for the degree of improvement, rated on a 5-point scale (1, very poor; 5, excellent), was 3.5 at the end of treatment, with a score of 2.6 for procedural discomfort (1, very mild; 5, very severe). After 12 months, the shapes of all ears were well maintained. The average overall satisfaction score was 3.6 (1, very dissatisfied; 5, very satisfied).

Conclusions We had reasonable outcomes in older patients. After 1 year of follow-up, these outcomes were well maintained. Patients past the ideal age at presentation can still be candidates for the molding technique.

This work was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (No. NRF- 2015R1D1A1A01060361, IS Yun) and presented at the 73rd Congress of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons on November 14, 2015 in Seoul, Korea.

Publication History

Received: 22 April 2016

Accepted: 19 October 2016

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2016. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Janz BA, Cole P, Hollier Jr LH. et al. Treatment of prominent and constricted ear anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 1 Suppl 27e-37e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB. et al. Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 19-27
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Naumann A. Otoplasty: techniques, characteristics and risks. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 6: Doc04
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kurozumi N, Ono S, Ishida H. Non-surgical correction of a congenital lop ear deformity by splinting with Reston foam. Br J Plast Surg 1982; 35: 181-182
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Byrd HS, Langevin CJ, Ghidoni LA. Ear molding in newborn infants with auricular deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1191-1200
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Doft MA, Goodkind AB, Diamond S. et al. The newborn butterfly project: a shortened treatment protocol for ear molding. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 577e-583e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Hirose T, Tomono T, Matsuo K. et al. Cryptotia: our classification and treatment. Br J Plast Surg 1985; 38: 352-360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tomono T. et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 38-51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Tan S, Wright A, Hemphill A. et al. Correction of deformational auricular anomalies by moulding: results of a fast-track service. N Z Med J 2003; 116: U584
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM. et al. Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 263-268
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 van Wijk MP, Breugem CC, Kon M. Non-surgical correction of congenital deformities of the auricle: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 727-736
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Yotsuyanagi T, Yokoi K, Urushidate S. et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in children older than early neonates. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101: 907-914
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Matsuo K, Hayashi R, Kiyono M. et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities. Clin Plast Surg 1990; 17: 383-395
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Bradbury ET, Hewison J, Timmons MJ. Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45: 97-100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Horlock N, Vogelin E, Bradbury ET. et al. Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 517-524
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Sheerin D, MacLeod M, Kusumakar V. Psychosocial adjustment in children with port-wine stains and prominent ears. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995; 34: 1637-1647
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Smith W, Toye J, Reid A. et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital ear abnormalities in the newborn: case series. Paediatr Child Health 2005; 10: 327-331
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Kalcioglu MT, Toplu Y, Ozturan O. et al. Anthropometric growth study of auricle of healthy preterm and term newborns. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 121-127
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar