CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43(05): 424-429
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.424
Original Article

Acellular Dermal Matrix as a Core Strut for Projection in Nipple Reconstruction: Approaches for Three Different Methods of Breast Reconstruction

Gui-Yong Park
Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Eul-Sik Yoon
Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Hee-Eun Cho
Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Byung-Il Lee
Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Seung-Ha Park
Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
› Institutsangaben

Background The objective of this paper was to describe a novel technique for improving the maintenance of nipple projection in primary nipple reconstruction by using acellular dermal matrix as a strut in one of three different configurations, according to the method of prior breast reconstruction. The struts were designed to best fill the different types of dead spaces in nipple reconstruction depending on the breast reconstruction method.

Methods A total of 50 primary nipple reconstructions were performed between May 2012 and May 2015. The prior breast reconstruction methods were latissimus dorsi (LD) flap (28 cases), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (10 cases), or tissue expander/implant (12 cases). The nipple reconstruction technique involved the use of local flaps, including the C-V flap or star flap. A 1×2-cm acellular dermal matrix was placed into the core with O-, I-, and L-shaped struts for prior LD, TRAM, and expander/implant methods, respectively. The projection of the reconstructed nipple was measured at the time of surgery and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively.

Results The nine-month average maintenance of nipple projection was 73.0%±9.67% for the LD flap group using an O-strut, 72.0%±11.53% for the TRAM flap group using an I-strut, and 69.0%±10.82% for the tissue expander/implant group using an L-strut. There were no cases of infection, wound dehiscence, or flap necrosis.

Conclusions The application of an acellular dermal matrix with a different kind of strut for each of 3 breast reconstruction methods is an effective addition to current techniques for improving the maintenance of long-term projection in primary nipple reconstruction.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Mai 2016

Angenommen: 08. September 2016

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. April 2022

© 2016. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A. et al. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 780-786
  • 2 Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ. et al. Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 1602-1605
  • 3 Lee PK, Lim JH, Ahn ST. et al. Nipple reconstruction with dermis(scar tissue) graft and C-V flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 33: 101-106
  • 4 Ahn HC, Choi EK, Hwang WJ. Nipple reconstruction using various local flaps. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 30: 183-188
  • 5 Kroll SS. Nipple reconstruction with the double-opposing tab flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 511-514
  • 6 Cothren CC, Gallego K, Anderson ED. et al. Chest wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) and a latissimus muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1015-1017
  • 7 Baxter RA. Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 1692-1696
  • 8 Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57: 1-5
  • 9 Gamboa-Bobadilla GM. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56: 22-25
  • 10 Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E. Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 373-381
  • 11 Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 250-255
  • 12 Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY. et al. The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60: 510-513
  • 13 Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E. et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 418-425
  • 14 Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1743-1753
  • 15 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Use of the acellular dermal matrix in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29: 485-493
  • 16 Duncan DI. Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 2001; 21: 81-84
  • 17 Nahabedian MY. Secondary nipple reconstruction using local flaps and AlloDerm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 2056-2061
  • 18 Garramone CE, Lam B. Use of AlloDerm in primary nipple reconstruction to improve long-term nipple projection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1663-1668
  • 19 Kim DY, Dhong ES, Yoon ES. et al. Long-term result of nipple reconstruction using skate flap after breast reconstruction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 38: 401-407