impact factor, citescore
logo
 

Full Papers

 

Evidence that systemic therapies for psoriasis may reduce psoriatic arthritis occurrence


1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

 

  1. Rheumatology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Canada.
  2. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  3. Rheumatology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Canada.
  4. Rheumatology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Canada.
  5. University of Leeds Faculty of Medicine, Rheumatology, Leeds, UK.
  6. Rheumatology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Canada. saydin@toh.ca

CER12213
2020 Vol.38, N°2
PI 0257, PF 0261
Full Papers

Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)

PMID: 31287403 [PubMed]

Received: 05/03/2019
Accepted : 20/05/2019
In Press: 28/06/2019
Published: 26/03/2020

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
Contemporary biologic therapies for psoriasis are independently licensed for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Since skin disease generally predates PsA and PsA has a subclinical phase, we investigated the pattern of PsA evolution in psoriasis treated with biologic agents compared to other medications including oral therapy, topical agents or no treatments.
METHODS:
A retrospective chart review was performed in psoriasis patients with musculoskeletal symptoms referred for rheumatological assessment. Patients who had a final diagnosis of PsA were identified. The frequency and clinical features of PsA were compared for biologics versus the other strategies.
RESULTS:
Between 2015-18, 203 psoriasis patients were referred for musculoskeletal symptoms with 25 on biologics, 31 on non-biologic systemic therapies and 147 on topical/no therapies. A final diagnosis of PsA was similar in all groups (biologics: 36%; non-biologic systemic treatments: 35.4%; none/local treatments: 37.4%). Most patients had musculoskeletal symptoms before systemic therapy initiation but new onset PsA was evident in 12% (3/25) biologics treated patients, 9.6% (3/31) in non-biologic systemic therapy patients and was significantly higher in patients on topical/no therapy (55/147; 37.4%, p<0.001). Among patients with PsA, none of the patients on biologics exhibited dactylitis compared to 28.6% of other systemic treatments and 48.6% of none/local treatments (p=0.046).
CONCLUSIONS:
New symptoms and signs leading to PsA diagnosis appear to decrease with systemic treatments. The characteristic PsA dactylitis lesion was not evident in the biologic therapy group.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/8thj0l

Rheumatology Article

Rheumatology Addendum