ORIGINAL PAPER
Spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging findings in ovarian torsion
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2018-06-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2018-08-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-08-20
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-18
 
 
Pol J Radiol, 2018; 83: 564-575
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Ovarian torsion is the twisting of the ovary on its vascular pedicle resulting in vascular compromise. Diagnosis of ovarian torsion is challenging in patients who have atypical clinical or ultrasound (US) findings. The objective of our study was to demonstrate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ovarian torsion to help radiologists make a conclusive diagnosis when the clinical and US findings are unclear.

Material and methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and MRI features in 10 females with surgically proven ovarian torsion, who had inconclusive clinical, US, or computed tomography findings.

Results:
All patients showed a significantly enlarged ovary with size ranging from 5 to 18 cm. ‘Twisted ovarian pedicle’ sign was seen in seven patients. Eight cases showed areas of haemorrhage within the ovarian stroma. Non-enhancement of ovarian stroma was observed in six patients. Seven patients showed an ipsilateral deviation of the uterus.

Conclusions:
MRI features of ovarian torsion include ovarian enlargement, twisted ovarian pedicle, ovarian haemorrhage, abnormal ovarian enhancement, and ipsilateral deviation of the uterus. Awareness of these imaging features will enable the radiologist to recognise ovarian torsion and differentiate it reliably from other benign or malignant ovarian lesions.

 
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Smolinski SE, Kreychman A, Catanzano T. Ovarian torsion: multimodality review of imaging characteristics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015; 39: 922-924.
 
2.
Ghonge NP, Lall C, Aggarwal B, Bhargava P. The MRI whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiol Case Rep 2015; 7: 731.
 
3.
Hiller N, Appelbaum L, Simanovsky N, et al. CT features of adnexal torsion. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 124-129.
 
4.
Duigenan S, Oliva E, Lee SI. Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: W122-131.
 
5.
Chiou SY, Lev-Toaff AS, Masuda E, et al. Adnexal torsion: new clinical and imaging observations by sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1289-1301.
 
6.
Ssi-Yan-Kai G, Rivain AL, Trichot C, et al. What every radiologist should know about adnexal torsion. Emerg Radiol 2018; 25: 51-59.
 
7.
Wilkinson C, Sanderson A. Adnexal torsion – a multimodality imaging review. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 476-483.
 
8.
Lourenco AP, Swenson D, Tubbs RJ, et al. Ovarian and tubal torsion: imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI. Emerg Radiol 2014; 21: 179-187.
 
9.
Brown PF, McLendon HL, Pettitt BJ. Ovarian torsion in a patient with congenital absence of the uterus. Pediatr Surg Int 1992; 7: 67-68.
 
10.
Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. RadioGraphics 2002; 22: 283-294.
 
11.
Kawakami K, Murata K, Kawaguchi N, et al. Hemorrhagic infarction of the diseased ovary: a common MR finding in two cases. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11: 595-597.
 
12.
Moribata Y, Kido A, Yamaoka T, et al. MR imaging findings of ovarian torsion correlate with pathological hemorrhagic infarction. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41: 1433-1439.
 
13.
Petkovska I, Duke E, Martin DR, et al. MRI of ovarian torsion: Correlation of imaging features with the presence of perifollicular hemorrhage and ovarian viability. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 2064-2071.
 
14.
Kimura I, Togashi K, Kawakami S, et al. Ovarian torsion: CT and MR imaging appearances. Radiology 1994; 190: 337-341.
 
15.
Iraha Y, Okada M, Iraha R, et al. CT and MR imaging of gynecologic emergencies. Radiographics 2017; 37: 1569-1586.
 
16.
Patil AR, Nandikoor S, Rao A, et al. Multimodality imaging in adnexal torsion. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2015; 59: 7-19.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top