History and application of artificial neural networks in dentistry

 

 Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a commonly used term in daily life, and there are now two subconcepts that divide the entire range of meanings currently encompassed by the term. The coexistence of the concepts of strong and weak AI can be seen as a result of the recognition of the limits of mathematical and engineering concepts that have dominated the definition. This presentation reviewed the concept, history, and the current application of AI in daily life. Applications of AI are becoming a reality that is commonplace in all areas of modern human life. Efforts to develop robots controlled by AI have been continuously carried out to maximize human convenience. AI has also been applied in the medical decision-making process, and these AI systems can help nonspecialists to obtain expert-level information. Artificial neural networks are highly interconnected networks of computer processors inspired by biological nervous systems. These systems may help connect dental professionals all over the world. Currently, the use of AI is rapidly advancing beyond text-based, image-based dental practice. This presentation reviewed the history of artificial neural networks in the medical and dental fields, as well as current application in dentistry. As the use of AI in the entire medical field increases, the role of AI in dentistry will be greatly expanded. Currently, the use of AI is rapidly advancing beyond text-based, image-based dental practice. In addition to diagnosis of visually confirmed dental caries and impacted teeth, studies applying machine learning based on artificial neural networks to dental treatment through analysis of dental magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and cephalometric radiography are actively underway, and some visible results are emerging at a rapid pace for commercialization.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Legg S, Hutter M. Universal intelligence: A definition of machine intelligence. Minds Mach 2007; 17: 391-444
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 2 Albus JS. Outline for a theory of intelligence. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybern 1991; 21: 473-509
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 3 Zackova E. Intelligence explosion quest for humankind. In: Romportl J, Zackova E, Kelemen J. editors Beyond Artificial Intelligence: The Disappearing Human-Machine Divide. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015: p. 34
  Google Scholar
• 4 Copeland BJ, Sylvan R. Beyond the universal Turing machine. Australas J Philos 1999; 77: 46-66
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 5 Pradhan T. Enhancement of Turing machine to universal Turing machine to halt for recursive enumerable language and its JFLAP simulation. Int J Hybrid Infor Tech 2015; 8: 193-202
  Google Scholar
• 6 Dreyfus H. The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental. In: Schear J. editor Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World. New York: Routledge; 2013: p. 17-23
  Google Scholar
• 7 Weinbaum D, Veitas V. Open ended intelligence: the individuation of intelligent agents. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 2017; 29: 371-96
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kant I. Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner; 1956: p. A76-80 B102-6
  Google Scholar
• 9 Floridi L. Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction. New York: Routledge; 1999: p. 148
  Google Scholar
• 10 Perlovsky LI. Neural mechanisms of the mind, aristotle, zadeh, and fMRI. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2010; 21: 718-33
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Nilsson N. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010
  Google Scholar
• 12 Uckelman SL. In: Computing with Concepts, Computing with Numbers: Llull, Leibniz, and Boole. Berlin: Springer; 2010: p. 427-37
• 13 Turing A. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc London Math Soc 1936; 42: 230-65
  Google Scholar
• 14 Turing A. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 1950; 49: 433-60
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kline R. Cybernetics, automata studies, and the Dartmouth conference on artificial intelligence. IEEE Ann History Computing 2011; 33: 5-16
  Google Scholar
• 16 McCulloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity 1943. Bull Math Biol 1990; 52: 99-115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Poulton MM. A Brief History. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2001: p. 10
  Google Scholar
• 18 Newell A, Simon HA. Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Commun ACM 1976; 19: 113-26
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 19 Bowling M, Fürnkranz J, Graepel T, Musick R. Machine learning and games. Mach Learn 2006; 63: 211-5
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 20 Dreyfus H. Alchemy and Artificial Intelligence. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation; 1965
  Google Scholar
• 21 Weizenbaum J. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1976
  Google Scholar
• 22 Weizenbaum J. ELIZA-a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun ACM 1966; 9: 36-45
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 23 Ho Y, Bryson A, Baron S. Differential games and optimal pursuit-evasion strategies. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1965; 10: 385-9
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 24 Bryson A, Ho Y. Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control. New York: Taylor and Francis; 1975
  Google Scholar
• 25 Jackson P. Introduction to Expert Systems. London: Addison Wesley; 1986
  Google Scholar
• 26 Shortliffe EH, Buchanan BG. A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Math Biosci 1975; 23: 351-79
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 27 Forbus KD. AI and cognitive science: The past and next 30 years. Top Cogn Sci 2010; 2: 345-56
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Balint A, Belov A, Matti J, Sinz C. Overview and analysis of the SAT Challenge 2012 solver competition. Artif Intell 2015; 223: 120-55
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 29 Zinchenko K, Wu CY, Song KT. A study on speech recognition control for a surgical robot. IEEE Trans Indust Inform 2017; 13: 607-15
  Google Scholar
• 30 Dirican C. The impacts of robotics, artificial intelligence on business and economics. Proced Soc Behav Sci 2015; 195: 564-73
  Google Scholar
• 31 Alessandri E, Gasparetto A, Garcia RV, Béjar RM. An application of artificial intelligence to medical robotics. J Intell Robot Syst 2005; 41: 225-43
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 32 White SC. Decision-support systems in dentistry. J Dent Educ 1996; 60: 47-63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Steimann F. On the use and usefulness of fuzzy sets in medical AI. Artif Intell Med 2001; 21: 131-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Ramesh AN, Kambhampati C, Monson JR, Drew PJ. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004; 86: 334-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Barbieri C, Molina M, Ponce P, Tothova M, Cattinelli I, Ion Titapiccolo J. et al. An international observational study suggests that artificial intelligence for clinical decision support optimizes anemia management in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2016; 90: 422-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Maes P. Artificial life meets entertainment: Lifelike autonomous agents. Commun ACM 1995; 38: 108-14
  Google Scholar
• 37 Wong BK, Monaco JA. Expert system applications in business: A review and analysis of the literature (1977 and ndash; 1993). Inf Manage 1995; 29: 141-52
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 38 Collen MF, Shortliffe EH. The Creation of a New Discipline. In: Collen MF, Ball MJ. editors The History of Medical Informatics in the United States. London: Springer London; 2015: p. 75-120
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 39 Best ML, Wade KW. The internet and democracy: Global catalyst or democratic dud?. B Sci Technol Soc 2009; 29: 255-71
  Google Scholar
• 40 Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S. et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2017; 2: 230-43
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Salari N, Shohaimi S, Najafi F, Nallappan M, Karishnarajah I. A novel hybrid classification model of genetic algorithms, modified k-nearest neighbor and developed backpropagation neural network. PLoS One 2014; 9: e112987
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Zhu J, Wen D, Yu Y, Meudt HM, Nakhleh L. Bayesian inference of phylogenetic networks from bi-allelic genetic markers. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14: e1005932
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Khanna S. Artificial intelligence: Contemporary applications and future compass. Int Dent J 2010; 60: 269-72
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Kim EY, Lim KO, Rhee HS. Predictive modeling of dental pain using neural network. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 146: 745-6
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Nieri M, Crescini A, Rotundo R, Baccetti T, Cortellini P, Prato GP. Factors affecting the clinical approach to impacted maxillary canines: A bayesian network analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010; 137: 755-62
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Xie X, Wang L, Wang A. Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 262-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Kakilehto T, Salo S, Larmas M. Data mining of clinical oral health documents for analysis of the longevity of different restorative materials in Finland. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: e68-74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Jackson J. Data mining; A conceptual overview. Commun Assoc Infor Sys 2002; 8: 267-96
  Google Scholar
• 49 Korhonen M, Gundagar M, Suni J, Salo S, Larmas M. A practice-based study of the variation of diagnostics of dental caries in new and old patients of different ages. Caries Res 2009; 43: 339-44
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Miladinović M, Mihailović B, Janković A, Tošić G, Mladenović D, Živković D. et al. Reasons for extraction obtained by artificial intelligence. Acta Fac Med Naissensis 2010; 27: 143-58
  Google Scholar