Advancements in all-ceramics for dental restorations and their effect on the wear of opposing dentition

 

PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Tooth wear is a process that is usually a result of tooth to tooth and/or tooth and restoration contact. The process of wear essentially becomes accelerated by the introduction of restorations inside the oral cavity, especially in case of opposing ceramic restorations. The newest materials have vastly contributed toward the interest in esthetic dental restorations and have been extensively studied in laboratories. However, despite the recent technological advancements, there has not been a valid in vivo method of evaluation involving clinical wear caused due to ceramics upon restored teeth and natural dentition. The aim of this paper is to review the latest advancements in all-ceramic materials, and their effect on the wear of opposing dentition. The descriptive review has been written after a thorough MEDLINE/PubMed search by the authors. It is imperative that clinicians are aware of recent advancements and that they should always consider the type of ceramic restorative materials used to maintain a stable occlusal relation. The ceramic restorations should be adequately finished and polished after the chair-side adjustment process of occlusal surfaces.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Sulong MZ, Aziz RA. Wear of materials used in dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 342-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Shellis RP, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci 2014; 25: 32-45
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Wiley MG. Effects of porcelain on occluding surfaces of restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 133-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Bani D, Bani T, Bergamini M. Morphologic and biochemical changes of the masseter muscles induced by occlusal wear: Studies in a rat model. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 1735-44
  Google Scholar
• 5 Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 451-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ohlmann B, Trame JP, Dreyhaupt J, Gabbert O, Koob A, Rammelsberg P. Wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns after 2 years. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 782-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Levrini L, Di Benedetto G, Raspanti M. Dental wear: A scanning electron microscope study. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 340425
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hanif A, Rashid H, Nasim M. Tooth surface loss revisited: Classification, etiology and management. J Res Dent 2015; 3: 37-43
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 9 Huysmans MC, Chew HP, Ellwood RP. Clinical studies of dental erosion and erosive wear. Caries Res 2011; 45 (Suppl. 01) 60-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kitasako Y, Sasaki Y, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Tagami J. Age-specific prevalence of erosive tooth wear by acidic diet and gastroesophageal reflux in Japan. J Dent 2015; 43: 418-23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Richter S, Eliasson ST. Enamel erosion and mechanical tooth wear in medieval Icelanders. Acta Odontol Scand 2016; 74: 186-93
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Etman MK, Woolford M, Dunne S. Quantitative measurement of tooth and ceramic wear: in vivo study. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 245-52
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Park S, Quinn JB, Romberg E, Arola D. On the brittleness of enamel and selected dental materials. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1477-85
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Rashid H. Evaluation of the surface roughness of a standard abraded dental porcelain following different polishing techniques. J Dent Sci 2012; 7: 184-98
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 15 Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2003; 13: 168-75
  Google Scholar
• 16 Passos SP, de Freitas AP, Iorgovan G, Rizkalla AS, Santos MJ, Santos JúniorGC. Enamel wear opposing different surface conditions of different CAD/CAM ceramics. Quintessence Int 2013; 44: 743-51
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occlusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971; 82: 154-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Pilathadka S, Vahalova D. Contemporary all-ceramic materials, part-1. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2007; 50: 101-4
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Datla SR, Alla RK, Alluri VR, Babu J, Konakanchi A. Dental ceramics: Part II – Recent advances in dental ceramics. Am J Mater Eng Technolog 2015; 3: 19-26
  Google Scholar
• 20 Rashid H. Comparing glazed and polished ceramic surfaces using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Adv Microsc Res 2012; 7: 1-6
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 21 Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Phase transformations in feldspathic dental porcelains. In: Fischman G, Clare A, Hench L. editors. Bioceramics: Materials and Applications. Westerville: The American Ceramic Society; 1995: p. 149-56
  Google Scholar
• 22 Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NR. All-ceramic systems: Laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 333-52
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Fons-Font A, Solá-Ruíz MF, Granell-Ruíz M, Labaig-Rueda C, Martínez-González A. Choice of ceramic for use in treatments with porcelain laminate veneers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: E297-302
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: Historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) 84-96
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Atala MH, Gul EB. How to strengthen dental ceramics. Int J Dent Sci Res 2015; 3: 24-27
  Google Scholar
• 26 Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials. Spain: Mosby; 1994: p. 201-14
  Google Scholar
• 27 O'Brien WJ. Magnesia ceramic jacket crowns. Dent Clin North Am 1985; 29: 719-23
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 O'Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM, Mora GP, Tien TY. The strengthening mechanism of a magnesia core ceramic. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 242-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Sadaqah NR. Ceramic laminate veneers: Materials advances and selection. Open J Stomatol 2014; 4: 268-79
  Google Scholar
• 30 Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina – Advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1999; 7: 113-9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Raut A, Rao PL, Ravindranath T. Zirconium for esthetic rehabilitation: An overview. Indian J Dent Res 2011; 22: 140-3
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: Double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 9-13
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Deany IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996; 7: 134-43
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: An update. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13: 195-203
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Sukumaran VG, Bharadwaj N. Ceramics in dental applications, trends biomater. Artif Organs 2006; 20: 7-11
  Google Scholar
• 36 Denry IL, Mackert Jr. JR, Holloway JA, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of cubic leucite stabilization on the flexural strength of feldspathic dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1928-35
  Google Scholar
• 37 Mackert Jr. JR, Williams AL. Microcracks in dental porcelain and their behavior during multiple firing. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1484-90
  Google Scholar
• 38 Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Schärer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 9-16
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Höland W, Apel E, van't Hoen C, Rheinberger V. Studies of crystal phase formations in highstrength lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. J Non Cryst Solids 2006; 352: 4041-50
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 40 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Influence of hot pressing on the microstructure and fracture toughness of two pressable dental glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 99-107
  Google Scholar
• 41 Fairhurst CW. Dental ceramics: The state of the science. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 78-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Taskonak B, Anusavice KJ, Mecholsky Jr JJ. Role of investment interaction layer on strength and toughness of ceramic laminates. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 701-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 7S-13S
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 44-56
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, Lebeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105: 83-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Janowski GM. Evaluation of the optical properties of CAD-CAM generated yttria-stabilized zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 300-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Shammas M, Alla RK. Color and shade matching in dentistry, trends biomater. Artif Organs 2011; 25: 172-5
  Google Scholar
• 48 Burwell J. Survey of possible wear mechanisms. Wear 1957; 1: 119-41
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 49 Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: A systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci 2013; 5: 183-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 571-9
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 320-3
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Harrison A, Lewis TT. The development of an abrasion testing machine for dental materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 9: 341-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Derand P, Vereby P. Wear of low-fusing dental porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 460-3
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Metzler KT, Woody RD, Miller 3^rd AW, Miller BH. In vitro investigation of the wear of human enamel by dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 356-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthodont 2003; 12: 168-75
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Cheung KC, Darvell BW. Sintering of dental porcelain: Effect of time and temperature on appearance and porosity. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 163-73
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 DeLong R, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, Pintado MR. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 214-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 536-41
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Rasmussen ST, Ngaji-Okumu W, Boenke K, O'Brien WJ. Optimum particle size distribution for reduced sintering shrinkage of a dental porcelain. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 43-50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Anusavice KJ, Lee RB. Effect of firing temperature and water exposure on crack propagation in unglazed porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1075-81
  Google Scholar
• 61 Piddock V. Effect of alumina concentration on the thermal diffusivity of dental porcelain. J Dent 1989; 17: 290-4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25: 299-306
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Wang L, D'Alpino PH, Lopes LG, Pereira JC. Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: Relative contribution of laboratory tests. J Appl Oral Sci 2003; 11: 162-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Imai Y, Suzuki S, Fukushima S. Enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 315-23
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Schuh C, Kinast EJ, Mezzomo E, Kapczinski MP. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 245-52
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Podshadley AG, Harrison JD. Rat connective tissue response to pontic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 110-8
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 67 Al-Wahadni AM, Martin DM. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of glazed, unglazed and refinished dental porcelain on an opposing material. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 538-46
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Jacobi R, Shillingburg Jr. HT, Duncanson Jr MG. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 303-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Pascal M, Belser U. Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2002: 2003
  Google Scholar
• 70 Al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Smith GM. Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 476-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Patterson CJ, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Polishing of porcelain by using a refinishing kit. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 383-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Wright MD, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, Thompson GA, Runyan DA. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 486-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar