Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · World J Nucl Med 2019; 18(04): 351-360
DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_72_18
Original Article

Performance characteristic evaluation of a bismuth germanate-based high-sensitivity 5-ring discovery image quality positron emission tomography/computed tomography system as per National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2012

Ashish Jha
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sneha Mithun
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Ameya Puranik
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Nilendu Purandare
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sneha Shah
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Archi Agrawal
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Venkatesh Rangarajan
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) provides guidelines to assess the performance of Positron Emission Tomography (PET). A PET/CT scanner, Discovery IQ, GE Medical systems, Milwaukee, USA was installed in our department which has high a sensitivity PET component. We have performed the NEMA NU-2 2012 quality control tests to evaluate this system on site before clinical use. Performance measurements of the PET scanner were made using the NEMA NU2-2012 procedures for spatial resolution, scatter fraction, sensitivity, count rate loss and random coincidence estimation, Noise Equivalent Count Rate (NECR) and image quality. As per NU2 2012, spatial resolution was measured at 1 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm vertically from the centre and at each of these points resolution was measured at tangential, radial and axial directions. Sensitivity was measured at centre and 10 cm off center vertically from the center. The system sensitivity is reported as an average of the two measured values. Scatter fraction and NECR measurements, Image quality test was also performed. The tangential, radial and axial FWHM were 4.99 mm, 4.20 mm and 4.79 mm at 1 cm off centre, 5.49 mm, 4.69 mm and 4.81 mm at 10 cm off centre and 7.99 mm, 5.07 mm and 4.95 mm at 20 cm off centre respectively. The absolute sensitivity of this scanner was found to be 20.1 cps/kBq. The scatter fraction calculated from the decay method was 37.94% and NECR was 125 kcps. The peak NECR was achieved at activity concentration of 8.7 KBq/ml and the count loss below the peak NECR was found to be 0.68%. Image quality test for, contrast recovery, background variability and lung error residual mean met all specifications. Overall PET performance of Discovery IQ whole-body scanner was satisfactory and the scanner met all the performance specifications required by NEMA 2012.

Keywords

Discovery image quality - image quality - National Electrical Manufacturers Association evaluation - National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-2 2012 - Q. clear - VPHD

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Received: 21 August 2018

Accepted: 31 August 2018

Article published online:
22 April 2022

© 2019. Sociedade Brasileira de Neurocirurgia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Pauwels EK, Coumou AW, Kostkiewicz M, Kairemo K. [18 F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in oncology: Initial staging and evaluation of cancer therapy. Med Princ Pract 2013;22:427-37.
  • 2 Townsend DW. Combined positron emission tomography-computed tomography: The historical perspective. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2008;29:232-5.
  • 3 Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. Acombined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1369-79.
  • 4 Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:907-21.
  • 5 Melcher CL. Scintillation crystals for PET. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1051-5.
  • 6 Surti S, Kuhn A, Werner ME, Perkins AE, Kolthammer J, Karp JS. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med 2007;48:471-80.
  • 7 Karp JS, Surti S, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Muehllehner G. Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: Experimental and clinical results. J Nucl Med 2008;49:462-70.
  • 8 Jakoby BW, Bercier Y, Conti M, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Townsend DW, et al. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:2375-89.
  • 9 Moses W. Time of flight in PET revisited. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:1325-30.
  • 10 Zanzonico P. Positron emission tomography: A review of basic principles, scanner design and performance, and current systems. Semin Nucl Med 2004;34:87-111.
  • 11 National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Performance Measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2007. Rosslyn, USA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2007.
  • 12 National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Performance Measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2012. Rosslyn, USA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2012.
  • 13 Kajisako M, Kawase S, Mitsumoto K, Tatsuno K, Higashimura K, Nakamoto1 Y, et al. Performance evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q. Clear on BGO PET/CT system, according to NEMA NU2-2012 standard. J Nucl Med 2016;57 Suppl 2:2627.
  • 14 Morzenti S, De Ponti E, Guerra L, Zorz A, Landoni C, Crivellaro C, et al. Performance evaluation of the discovery IQ-GE PET/CT scanner according to NEMA NU2-2012 standard. J Nucl Med 2015;56 Suppl 3:1846.
  • 15 Jha A, Mithun S, Singh A, Purandare N, Shah S, Agrawal A, et al. NEMA NU-2 2012 performance evaluation of discovery IQ: A high sensitivity PET system. J Nucl Med 2015;56 Suppl 3:1847.
  • 16 Romanov LV, Holtermann PF, McDaniel DL, Widen JI. Design of a Data Acquisition System to Reduce Count Rate Losses in a PET Scanner, Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) 2013 IEEE; 2013. p. 1-5.
  • 17 Geman S, McClure DE. Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction. Bull Int Stat Inst. 1987;52:5–21.
  • 18 Teoh EJ, McGowan DR, Macpherson RE, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV. Phantom and clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q. Clear on an LYSO PET/CT system. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1447-52.
  • 19 Phunpueok CA, Chewpraditkul W, Thongpool V, Aphairaj D. Comparison of Photofraction for LuYAP: Ce, LYSO: Ce and BGO Crystals in Gamma Ray Detection. The 15th International Conference of International Academy of Physical Sciences. Pathumthani, Thailand; 2012.
  • 20 Bismuth Germanate Scintillation Material. Available from: http://www.crystals.saint-gobain.com/sites/imdf.crystals.com/files/documents/bgo-material-data-sheet_69763.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 23].
  • 21 Grant AM, Levin CS. Optical delay encoding for fast timing and detector signal multiplexing in PET. Med Phys 2015;42:4526-35.
  • 22 Alenius S, Ruotsalainen U. Bayesian image reconstruction for emission tomography based on median root prior. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:258-65.
  • 23 Sharma SD, Prasad R, Shetye B, Rangarajan V, Deshpande D, Shrivastava SK, et al. Whole-body PET acceptance test in 2D and 3D using NEMA NU 2-2001 protocol. J Med Phys 2007;32:150-5.
  • 24 Jha AK, Mithun S, Singh AM, Purandare NC, Shah S, Agrawal A, et al. 18-month performance assessment of Gemini TF 16 PET/CT system in a high-volume department. J Nucl Med Technol 2016;44:36-41.
  • 25 Reynés-Llompart G, Gámez-Cenzano C, Romero-Zayas I, Rodríguez-Bel L, Vercher-Conejero JL, Martí-Climent JM, et al. Performance characteristics of the whole-body discovery IQ PET/CT system. J Nucl Med 2017;58:1155-61.