PDF herunterladen
Methods Inf Med 2016; 55(04): 333-339
DOI: 10.3414/ME15-01-0143
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

What Searches Do Users Run on PEDro?[*]

An Analysis of 893,971 Search Commands Over a 6-Month Period
Matthew L. Stevens
1   The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
,
Anne Moseley
1   The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
,
Mark R. Elkins
2   Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
,
Christine C.-W. Lin
1   The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
,
Chris G. Maher
1   The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received: 28. Oktober 2015

accepted in revised form: 18. Februar 2016

Publikationsdatum:
08. Januar 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Background: Clinicians must be able to search effectively for relevant research if they are to provide evidence-based healthcare. It is therefore relevant to consider how users search databases of evidence in healthcare, including what information users look for and what search strategies they employ. To date such analyses have been restricted to the PubMed database. Although the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) is searched millions of times each year, no studies have investigated how users search PEDro.

Objectives: To assess the content and quality of searches conducted on PEDro. Methods: Searches conducted on the PEDro website over 6 months were downloaded and the ‘get’ commands and page-views extracted. The following data were tabulated: the 25 most common searches; the number of search terms used; the frequency of use of simple and advanced searches, including the use of each advanced search field; and the frequency of use of various search strategies.

Results: Between August 2014 and January 2015, 893,971 search commands were entered on PEDro. Fewer than 18 % of these searches used the advanced search features of PEDro. ‘Musculoskeletal’ was the most common subdiscipline searched, while ‘low back pain’ was the most common individual search. Around 20 % of all searches contained errors.

Conclusions: PEDro is a commonly used evidence resource, but searching appears to be sub-optimal in many cases. The effectiveness of searches conducted by users needs to improve, which could be facilitated by methods such as targeted training and amending the search interface.

Keywords

Information systems - bibliographic databases - search engines - PEDro - physiotherapy

* Supplementary material published on our web-site http://dx.doi.org/10.3414/ME15-01-0143


 

  • References

  • 1 Michels C, Schmoch U. The growth of science and database coverage. Scientometrics 2012; 93 (Suppl. 03) 831-46.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, Maher CG. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother 2002; 48 (Suppl. 01) 439.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Higgins J, Green S. editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. [updated March 2011]. 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fatehi F, Gray LC, Wootton R. How to improve your PubMed/MEDLINE searches: 2. display settings, complex search queries and topic searching. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 20 (Suppl. 01) 44-55.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fatehi F, Gray LC, Wootton R. How to improve your PubMed/MEDLINE searches: 3. advanced searching, MeSH and My NCBI. J Telemed Tele-care 2014; 20 (Suppl. 02) 102-12.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).. Search Help [Internet]. 2015 Available from: http://www.pedro.org.au/english/search-help.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).. PubMed Help [Internet]. 2015 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3827/.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fatehi F, Gray LC, Wootton R. How to improve your PubMed/MEDLINE searches: 1. background and basic searching. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 19 (Suppl. 08) 479-86.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Herskovic JR, Tanaka LY, Hersh W, Bernstam EV. A Day in the Life of PubMed: Analysis of a Typical Day’s Query Log. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2007; 14 (Suppl. 02) 212-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Leroy G, Xu J, Chung W, Eggers S, Chen H. An end user evaluation of query formulation and results review tools in three medical meta-search engines. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (11–12) 780-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hoogendam A, Stalenhoef AFH, Robbé PF, de V, Overbeke AJPM. Analysis of queries sent to PubMed at the point of care: observation of search behaviour in a medical teaching hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8: 42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kamper SJ, Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Elkins MR, Sherrington C. 15 years of tracking physiotherapy evidence on PEDro, where are we now?. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49 (Suppl. 14) 907-10.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Herbert R, Moseley A, Sherrington C, Maher C. Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Physiotherapy 2000; 86 (Suppl. 01) 55.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).. PEDro Statistics [Internet]. 2015 Available from: http://www.pedro.org.au/english/downloads/pedro-statistics/.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Islamaj Dogan R, Murray GC, Névéol A, Lu Z. Understanding PubMed® user search behavior through log analysis. Database. 2009 2009 (bap018).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mosa ASM, Yoo I. A study on PubMed search tag usage pattern: Association rule mining of a full-day PubMed query log. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 (Suppl. 01) 8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Elkins MR, Moseley AM, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG. Growth in the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and use of the PEDro scale. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47 (Suppl. 04) 188-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005; 37 (Suppl. 05) 360-3.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Akpala CO, Curran AP, Simpson J. Physiotherapy in General Practice: Patterns of Utilisation. Public Health 1988; 102: 263-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar