Cardiovascular Damage Associated With Chest Irradiation
Simone M. Mrotzek 
Tienush Rassaf
Matthias Totzeck- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
The improvement of anticancer-therapies results in a greater amount of long-term survivors after radiotherapy. Therefore, the understanding of cardiotoxicity after irradiation is of increasing importance. Cardiovascular adverse events after chest irradiation have been acknowledged for a long time but remain difficult to diagnose. Long-term cardiovascular adverse events may become evident years or decades after radiotherapy and the spectrum of potential cardiovascular side effects is large. Recent experimental and clinical data indicate that cardiovascular symptoms may be caused especially by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, which remains incompletely understood in patients after radiation therapy. Heart radiation dose and co-existing cardiovascular risk factors represent some of the most important contributors for incidence and severity of radiation-induced cardiovascular side effects. In this review, we aim to elucidate the underlying patho-mechanisms and to characterize the development of radiation-induced cardiovascular damage. Additionally, approaches for clinical management and treatment options are presented.
Introduction
Radiation therapy is an important part of multimodal treatment strategies in cancer therapy. Fifty to sixty percent of all patients with advanced cancer undergo irradiation (1, 2). The increasing number of cancer survivors also leads to an increase occurrence of late-time adverse events following radiation therapy (3, 4). Although strategies to spare surrounding tissue have been developed in modern radiation therapy techniques, damage of healthy tissue/organs cannot totally be avoided by performing an effective cancer treatment using ionized radiation. Exposure of the heart during chest/ thoracic irradiation occurs in particular during treatment of breast and lung cancer (especially left sided) as well as mediastinal lymphomas (3, 5, 6). With increasing number of long-term survivors of esophageal cancer resulting from the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy, the risk for radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity is now recognized as an issue of major concern also in this patient category (7).
Radiation-induced cardiovascular diseases typically manifest years or decades after cancer therapy. Therefore, a causal relation is often difficult to diagnose. Overall incidence and severity correlates with higher radiation dose, larger exposed volumes, younger age at time of exposure, and greater time elapsed since treatment (8, 9). But it has been shown that even little doses of 0.5 Gray (Gy) can significantly enhance cardiovascular risk for the patients (10) and that not total radiation dose but the “volume of the left ventricle receiving 5 Gy” (LV V5Gy) was an important prognostic dose-volume parameter (11). Moreover, concomitant or sequential treatment with cardiotoxic chemotherapy (e.g., anthracyclines) poses an additional risk for the development of radiation-induced cardiovascular damage (6, 12, 13). Early diagnosis seems to be important to decrease long-term damage, reduce incidence of fatal cardiovascular adverse events and improve quality of life in cancer survivors.
But not only late-time effects are important. An association between higher values of heart dosimetric variables and a worse overall survival at a median follow-up of 2 years was described, suggesting that radiation to the heart could contribute to early mortality in a non-small cell lung cancer population (14). Especially lung cancer patients are also more likely to have pre-existing risk factors such as known cardiac diseases (15) and smoking history that may predispose them to cardiovascular events occurring at earlier time points than would be seen in a healthier patient population treated with thoracic radiation therapy (16, 17).
Myocardial tissue was found to be very sensible to cancer therapy due to high metabolic activity (12). Underlying patho-mechanisms as well as clinical management of radiation-induced cardiovascular diseases are still incompletely characterized. In this review, we discuss different approaches and cardio-oncological strategies after chest irradiation- from bench to bedside.
Spectrum of Cardiovascular Diseases Following Chest Irradiation
The relative risk of fatal cardiovascular events in survivors after Hodgkin's lymphoma is 2.2–12.7 (median follow-up 18.7 years) and 2–2.2 after breast cancer (median follow-up 12 years) (18, 19). In survivors of childhood-cancer and single therapy with radiation, over 22% show signs of diastolic dysfunction in echocardiography studies (20). The spectrum of cardiovascular diseases associated with chest irradiation is in its occurrence and appearance manifold. Figure 1 gives an overview and illustrates the relation between different levels of cardiovascular damage.
Figure 1. A broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases is associated with chest irradiation. The combination of microvascular dysfunction, fibrosis, and amyloidosis leads to myocardial dysfunction as a late-time adverse event.
Radiation-induced pericarditis has been feared because the acute form often led to a life-threatening constrictive pericarditis. Due to advances in radiation protocols (improved techniques, lower dosages and less volume exposed) the occurrence has become rare nowadays (21). In contrast, chronic pericarditis is still one of the most frequent radiation-induced cardiotoxicities and is characterized by exudation of a protein-rich secretion (10). After chemo- and radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer an incidence of pericardial effusion of nearly 50% is described with the existing risk for cardiac tamponade (17, 22). The underlying patho-mechanism mainly includes inflammatory processes and fibrin-deposition due to microvascular damage (23).
Radiation-induced vascular damage can be divided into a micro- and marcovascular injury, but both can cause a significant myocardial perfusion deficit. Endothelial cells are describe to be very radiation-sensible and seem to form the initial point for patho-mechanistic changes after heart irradiation. Capillaries have only one layer of endothelial cells and are therefore especially challenged. Reduction in capillary density and a disturbed vascular network contribute particularly to the development of radiation-induced myocardial dysfunction (1). The macrovascular damage of the coronary arteries results in an enhanced development of arteriosclerosis. Possible radiation-exposed coronary segments such as the left main coronary artery and the ostial left anterior descending artery and ostial right coronary artery are mainly affected (8). The occurrence of a vascular inflammatory reaction, additional microvascular dysfunction, and subendothelial fibrosis leads to the development of unstable plaques in the large vessels and at the vascular bifurcations (23, 24). This results in an increased incidence of acute myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, and the development of ischemic cardiomyopathy (25). In women who underwent radiotherapy for breast cancer an increase of major coronary events started within the first 5 years after radiotherapy and continued into the third decade after radiotherapy (26). A four- to seven-fold increased risk of highgrade coronary artery stenosis in mid and distal left anterior descending artery was investigated when comparing women with irradiated left sided with those with right-sided breast cancer (27, 28). The precise signaling pathways are not fully understood. Also a difference in radiosensitivity due to different structure and subregions of the heart is discussed.
The development of radiation-induced cardiomyopathy is based on a combination of structural changes in myocardial tissue as well as a perfusion deficit resulting from micro- and macrovascular changes. Clinically, patients usually have a characteristic, diastolic functional impairment and heart failure with preserved systolic ejection function (3). Diffuse, interstitial fibrosis and amyloid deposition have been forwarded as underlying causes (29–31). Arrhythmias can occur as a result of these structural changes and further conduction system abnormalities. Direct damage to critical structures such as the sinoatrial or atrio-ventricular nodes may lead to bradycardia or all types of heart block (23).
In the area of the heart valves, fibrotic processes are most common on aortic and mitral valves and are similar to degenerative changes. Often these changes are hemodynamically irrelevant, however, in patients with radiation in childhood, higher-grade stenosis, or insufficiency of the heart valve can manifest itself clinically in early adulthood and require surgical treatment (21).
Patho-Mechanism and Development of Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Damage
Ionizing radiation induces cell death mainly through induction of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) single- and double-strand breaks (32). During cancer therapy, ionizing radiation is also associated with increased risk of damage to healthy, cancer surrounding tissue. Cardiomyocytes are described to be radio-resistant (30) but endothelial cells are particularly sensitive to radiation and are suspected to be the initial point for cardiovascular radiation-induced damage due to changes in the surrounding milieu (1, 33). In addition to direct vascular damage, there is also a causal relationship between endothelial dysfunction and the development of muscular, valvular, and arrhythmogenic complications, since the resulting pro-inflammatory environment is a strong initiator of cardiac fibrosis (1).
The mechanisms of endothelial damage primarily base on the induction of apoptosis (acute process) and increased senescence (cell aging, chronic process) (1). As a result, an inflammatory reaction with increased leukocyte recruitment and increased oxidative stress develops through the release of cytokines (1). Depending on the context, radiation-induced DNA damage in endothelial cells can be repaired or trigger apoptosis, which can be p53-mediated or induced by sphingomyelin-produced ceramides (34). In p53-mediated apoptosis, mediation via cytochrome C-induced mitochondrial initiation of apoptotic cell death is leading (intrinsic signaling pathway) (1, 34). Senescence is also triggered by radiation-induced DNA damage. It leads to a change in the cellular phenotype of the endothelial cells and thus to a secretion of cytokines, proteins and other factors (1).
Apoptosis and senescence of endothelial cells together lead to an imbalance between pro- and anticoagulatory as well as pro- and anti-inflammatory factors in the vascular milieu. This leads to an increased adhesion of leukocytes and macrophages, chronic inflammation, a pro-thrombotic status and the increased occurrence of reactive oxygen species (1).
Radiation-induced senescence leads to an inactivation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3k/Akt) signaling pathway and downregulates the serine/threonine kinase mTor (mechanistic target of rapamycin). As a regulator of actin polymerization and the interaction of cell adhesion molecules such as integrins, mTor has a direct influence on the contractility of smooth muscle cells (35, 36). Furthermore, an increased expression of cell surface-located cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) on endothelial cells has been described. This leads to an increased adhesion of monocytes and ultimately to an increased formation of arteriosclerosis (37).
In addition to adult endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells can also be damaged by radiation. This can lead to disturbed vascular remodeling and thus contribute to the development of vascular dysfunction (38). Within the endothelial progenitor cells, ionizing radiation triggers a p53 stabilization, a p21-mediated cell cycle arrest and finally an apoptosis mediated by Bax (Bcl-2-associated X protein) (39).
The development of radiation-induced cardiomyopathy results from an interaction of myocardial remodeling, degeneration and cellular dysfunction. A close connection with endothelial dysfunction due to the creation of a pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory environment has been suggested (10). Similar to the mechanisms of cardiac damage caused by anthracyclines, oxidative stress and inflammation lead to structural and functional damage to the cardiomyocytes due to membrane-bound lipid peroxidation (12). The inactivation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1 α (PGC1α), a key player in the regulation of lipid metabolism in the heart, plays a crucial role, too (10, 40). In contrast to endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes no longer undergo cell division postnatal, so they show no morphological changes (41).
The pro-inflammatory environment is furthermore a strong initiator of cardiac fibrosis (1). For example, interleukin-13 mediated fibroblasts are recruited from various sources such as mesenchymal cells and the bone marrow and ensure myocardial collagen storage (especially collagen types I and III) (23). Increased plasma levels of TGFβ (transforming growth factor-β), angiotensin II and aldosterone are also found after cardiac radiation, lead to increased myocardial fibrosis and thus represent possible therapeutic approaches for cardioprotection during and after radiation therapy (42).
Experimental Models for Characterization of Functional Cardiac Impairment After Chest Irradiation
Multiple animal models have been used to characterize radiation-induced cardiomyopathy. Radiation protocols vary between whole thorax and localized heart irradiation as well as single dose and fractionated schedules. Dosages differ between 5 up to 25 Gy (42). For investigation of radiation-induced coronary artery disease, transgenic mouse models are used because wild-type rodents are usually not prone to atherosclerosis (42). In ApoE−/− mice, the development of fatty streaks in carotid arteries was detected 4 weeks after radiation with 14 Gy and a reduction in vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1) as an indication for the development of atherosclerosis was described (43).
While endothelial cell damage plays a major role in the development of radiation-induced cardiac damage, reduction of microvascular density and cardiac capillary damage was found in mice and rats using different protocols (44, 45). This could be shown by an immuno-histological reduction of CD31 positive cells 40 and 60 weeks after 8 or 16 Gy single whole heart irradiation (45). For detailed evaluation of myocardial microvascular damage in vivo, DE-microCT (computed tomography) scans 4 or 8 weeks after partial heart irradiation with 12 Gy could show a time-dependent increase in accumulation of gold nanoparticles in the myocardium as a sign for extravasation. Perfusion defects have also be visualized using microSPECT (46).
Beside myocardial perfusion deficits through marco- and microvascular damages, late-onset radiation-induced cardiac damages are characterized by development of myocardial fibrosis. Collagen-deposition within the myocardial interstitium was described using histopathological staining with Masson's trichrome (31) and picrosirius red (30). In addition, an amyloid deposition was detected using congo-red staining (29, 45). Also increases in mRNA expression levels of pro-fibrotic genes like fibronectin have been shown after irradiation of rats' hearts (47).
Pre-clinical in vivo models can be used for characterization of cardiac functional impairment after irradiation using echocardiography and pressure-volume catheterization. Normal or even increased left-ventricular systolic function at baseline has been documented (30, 31, 45). In contrast, cardiac radiation exposure caused a diastolic dysfunction expressed by an elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP/ filling pressure) and higher Tau (time constant of isovolumentric relaxation) in radiated rats compared to control rats (30). Moreover, a reduced contractile reserve was found using mouse stress transthoracic echocardiography with isoproterenol (31).
Experimental studies also indicate a relevant heart-lung-interaction through thoracic radiation. Studies with irradiated rats showed that heart damage was aggravated if also the lung was irradiated and vice versa (47, 48). In addition, this could be translated to a clinical setting, suggesting an importance of heart and lung irradiation in the prediction of radiation-related valve disease in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (49, 50).
Clinical Implications and Therapeutic Strategies
The occurrence of cardiovascular side effects after radiation is primarily dependent on the radiation dose and the time interval after the cancer therapy. Table 1 summarizes information from various clinical studies regarding incidence of cardiovascular diseases.
Table 1. Incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality following chest irradiation.
Mediastinal radiation was identified as an important cardiovascular risk factor, but previously, cardiovascular diagnostics were usually only initiated after clinical symptoms had occurred. This leads to the fact that for example coronary heart disease after radiation manifests in a high proportion as fatal myocardial infarction. Late diagnosis is favored due to damaged peripheral nerve endings after mediastinal radiation whereby patients often present with atypical angina pectoris or even no symptoms (9). Peri-interventional and operative management is also aggravated due to the pronounced pathology at the time of diagnosis and mediastinal adhesions after tumor resection and radiation. The early diagnosis and therapy of radiation-induced heart disease is therefore of great relevance.
Cardiotoxic chemotherapy (e.g., anthracyclines) and chest irradiation is a common combination during treatment of breast cancer (Hodgkin), lymphoma, and childhood cancer which led to a success in the fight against cancer but but also reproduces the occurrence of long-term cardiotoxic side effects (6, 13, 55, 56). This is especially true for the development of heart failure due to a synergistic damage on cardiomyocytes (see also section on patho-mechanism) (12, 57). While resulted cardiomyopathy in patients treated with radiotherapy alone is characterized by diastolic dysfunction, combination of anthracycline therapy and chest irradiation more often leads to an additional clinical relevant systolic dysfunction (57, 58). Beside a simultaneous/sequential cardiotoxic chemotherapy, also patients with existing cardiovascular risk factors have a significantly increased risk of developing radiation-induced heart disease. Therefor an assessment of the individual cardiovascular risk profile should be conducted before starting radiation therapy (55, 59). In case of abnormalities, a cardio-oncological presentation for further diagnostics and development of an interdisciplinary treatment plan is recommended (60–62). Optimizing existing cardiovascular risk factors and pre-existing conditions is particularly important. After mediastinal radiation therapy, a preventive diagnostic approach using an electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiography are currently recommended 5 years after therapy, and in the following every 2–5 years depending on the individual presentation and risk assessment (3, 9, 59). Patients with childhood cancer are classified as high-risk collective from an average cardiac radiation dose of ≥35 Gy, adults from >30 Gy or at <30 Gy with co-existing history of anthracycline chemotherapy. Patients classified as high-risk should receive cardiac diagnostics with an ECG and echocardiography early (children 2 years, adults 1 year after radiation) (63, 64). The determination of the global longitudinal strain has been shown to be particularly sensitive in the detection of left ventricular dysfunction after mediastinal radiation (20) especially in combination of radiation with anthracycline chemotherapy (13). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should also be considered in poor echocardiographic conditions. A stress test (e.g., bicycle ergometry/stress ECG) or alternatively a coronary CT should be performed 10 years after radiation (59). These recommendations are currently based primarily on expert opinions and implementation in the guidelines is still pending (65, 66).
The relevance of cardiac biomarkers for prediction of cancer-therapy related cardiovascular toxicity is being discussed (61). Radiation-induced cardiac-cell damage and changes in the left ventricular loading conditions have been linked to several biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B–type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponins (67, 68), but the clinical applicability is still unclear.
Radiation therapy aims to maximize tumor control, while minimize the risk for radiation-induced adverse normal tissue effects (69). Therefore, strategies to reduce heart dose during radiation therapy are crucial. Technical improvements like deep inspiration breath hold gating and particle therapy (59, 70) as well as intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy, where delivered radiation dose varies between different treatment areas were developed (71). This helps to spare normal tissue but technical and physical strategies reach a natural limit while the main goal is still to perform an effective cancer therapy. Therefore, development of medical concepts to specifically protect normal tissue damage during and after radiation therapy represents an important research topic.
One promising therapeutic approach to reduce radiation-induced cardiovascular damage is the application of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (72–74). Studies indicate that for example the preventive administration of captopril in animal models can reduce radiation-induced cardiac damage (72). Additionally, the positive effects of an early initiated therapy with ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers are discussed in the context of other cancer therapies to help prevent heart failure from cancer therapy in general (74). Also lipid-lowering therapies with simvastatin has been observed to reduce radiation-induced cardiac damage (73, 75). Furthermore, medical therapy by interleukin-1 blockade (administration of anakinra) targeting radiation-induced vascular inflammation, has been evaluated recently (76). So far, however, none of the therapeutic approaches have been implemented in clinical practice and further studies are needed.
Conclusion
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-malignancy related death in cancer survivors (50). Minimizing the cardiac radiation dose is currently the only causal way to prevent radiation-induced heart diseases. Additional, assessment of cardiovascular risk before, during and, after irradiation and early diagnosis of radiation-induced cardiac damage is essential to further improve mortality and morbidity in cancer survivors. Further studies to characterize radiation-induced cardiovascular damage and to evaluate potential treatment option are needed.
Author Contributions
SM was responsible for review analysis, synthesis, and manuscript preparation. TR was responsible for drafting and proofreading the manuscript. MT was responsible for the concept design, synthesis, analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors approve the paper for submission.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
SM acknowledges the following funding source: IFORES research grant from the Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
References
1. Venkatesulu BP, Mahadevan LS, Aliru ML, Yang X, Bodd MH, Singh PK, et al. Radiation-induced endothelial vascular injury: a review of possible mechanisms. JACC Basic Transl Sci. (2018) 3:563–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.01.014
2. Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, Barton M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer. (2005) 104:1129–37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21324
3. Totzeck M, Schuler M, Stuschke M, Heusch G, Rassaf T. Cardio-oncology - strategies for management of cancer-therapy related cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol. (2019) 280:163–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.038
4. Zamorano J. An ESC position paper on cardio-oncology. Eur Heart J. (2016) 37:2739–40. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw359
5. Atkins KM, Rawal B, Chaunzwa TL, Lamba N, Bitterman DS, Williams CL, et al. Cardiac radiation dose, cardiac disease, and mortality in patients with lung cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 73:2976–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.500
6. van Nimwegen FA, Ntentas G, Darby SC, Schaapveld M, Hauptmann M, Lugtenburg PJ, et al. Risk of heart failure in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: effects of cardiac exposure to radiation and anthracyclines. Blood. (2017) 129:2257–65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-740332
7. Beukema JC, van Luijk P, Widder J, Langendijk JA, Muijs CT. Is cardiac toxicity a relevant issue in the radiation treatment of esophageal cancer? Radiother Oncol. (2015) 114:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.037
8. Boerma M. Experimental radiation-induced heart disease: past, present, and future. Radiat Res. (2012) 178:1–6. doi: 10.1667/RR2933.1
9. Lee Chuy K, Nahhas O, Dominic P, Lopez C, Tonorezos E, Sidlow R, et al. Cardiovascular complications associated with mediastinal radiation. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. (2019) 21:31. doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0737-0
10. Tapio S. Pathology and biology of radiation-induced cardiac disease. J Radiat Res. (2016) 57:439–48. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw064
11. van den Bogaard VA, Ta BD, van der Schaaf A, Bouma AB, Middag AM, Bantema-Joppe EJ, et al. Validation and modification of a prediction model for acute cardiac events in patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy based on three-dimensional dose distributions to cardiac substructures. J Clin Oncol. (2017) 35:1171–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.8480
12. Dalloz F, Maingon P, Cottin Y, Briot F, Horiot JC, Rochette L. Effects of combined irradiation and doxorubicin treatment on cardiac function and antioxidant defenses in the rat. Free Radic Biol Med. (1999) 26:785–800. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00259-7
13. Mercurio V, Cuomo A, Della Pepa R, Ciervo D, Cella L, Pirozzi F, et al. What is the cardiac impact of chemotherapy and subsequent radiotherapy in lymphoma patients? Antioxid Redox Signal. (2019) 31:1166–74. doi: 10.1089/ars.2019.7842
14. Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, Masters G, Blumenschein G, Schild S, et al. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. (2015) 16:187–99. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71207-0
15. Janssen-Heijnen ML, Schipper RM, Razenberg PP, Crommelin MA, Coebergh JW. Prevalence of co-morbidity in lung cancer patients and its relationship with treatment: a population-based study. Lung Cancer. (1998) 21:105–13. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(98)00039-7
16. Simone CB II. Thoracic radiation normal tissue injury. Semin Radiat Oncol. (2017). 27:370–7. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.04.009
17. Wang K, Eblan MJ, Deal AM, Lipner M, Zagar TM, Wang Y, et al. Cardiac toxicity after radiotherapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: pooled analysis of dose-escalation trials delivering 70 to 90 Gy. J Clin Oncol. (2017) 35:1387–94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.0229
18. Jaworski C, Mariani JA, Wheeler G, Kaye DM. Cardiac complications of thoracic irradiation. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2013) 61:2319–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.090
19. Aleman BM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, De Bruin ML, van 't Veer MB, Baaijens MH, de Boer JP, et al. Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. (2007) 109:1878–86. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-034405
20. Armstrong GT, Joshi VM, Ness KK, Marwick TH, Zhang N, Srivastava D, et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic detection of treatment-related cardiac dysfunction in adult survivors of childhood cancer: results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2015) 65:2511–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.013
21. Groarke JD, Nguyen PL, Nohria A, Ferrari R, Cheng S, Moslehi J. Cardiovascular complications of radiation therapy for thoracic malignancies: the role for non-invasive imaging for detection of cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. (2014) 35:612–23. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht114
22. Ning MS, Tang L, Gomez DR, Xu T, Luo Y, Huo J, et al. Incidence and predictors of pericardial effusion after chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2017) 99:70–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.022
23. Taunk NK, Haffty BG, Kostis JB, Goyal S. Radiation-induced heart disease: pathologic abnormalities and putative mechanisms. Front Oncol. (2015) 5:39. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00039
24. Fajardo LF, Stewart JR. Capillary injury preceding radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis. Radiology. (1971) 101:429–33. doi: 10.1148/101.2.429
25. Lenneman CG, Sawyer DB. Cardio-oncology: an update on cardiotoxicity of cancer-related treatment. Circ Res. (2016) 118:1008–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303633
26. Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, Bennet AM, Blom-Goldman U, Bronnum D, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. (2013) 368:987–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209825
27. Nilsson G, Witt Nystrom P, Isacsson U, Garmo H, Duvernoy O, Sjogren I, et al. Radiation dose distribution in coronary arteries in breast cancer radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. (2016) 55:959–63. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1182209
28. Nilsson G, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Duvernoy O, Sjogren I, Lagerqvist B, et al. Distribution of coronary artery stenosis after radiation for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2012) 30:380–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.5900
29. Sievert W, Stangl S, Steiger K, Multhoff G. Improved overall survival of mice by reducing lung side effects after high-precision heart irradiation using a small animal radiation research platform. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2018) 101:671–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.02.017
30. Saiki H, Moulay G, Guenzel AJ, Liu W, Decklever TD, Classic KL, et al. Experimental cardiac radiation exposure induces ventricular diastolic dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2017) 313:H392–407. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00124.2017
31. Mezzaroma E, Di X, Graves P, Toldo S, Van Tassell BW, Kannan H, et al. A mouse model of radiation-induced cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. (2012) 156:231–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.01.038
32. Mladenov E, Magin S, Soni A, Iliakis G. DNA double-strand break repair as determinant of cellular radiosensitivity to killing and target in radiation therapy. Front Oncol. (2013) 3:113. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00113
33. Wirsdorfer F, Jendrossek V. Modeling DNA damage-induced pneumopathy in mice: insight from danger signaling cascades. Radiat Oncol. (2017) 12:142. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0865-1
34. Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. (2007) 35:495–516. doi: 10.1080/01926230701320337
35. Yentrapalli R, Azimzadeh O, Sriharshan A, Malinowsky K, Merl J, Wojcik A, et al. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is implicated in the premature senescence of primary human endothelial cells exposed to chronic radiation. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e70024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070024
36. Jacinto E, Loewith R, Schmidt A, Lin S, Ruegg MA, Hall A, et al. Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat Cell Biol. (2004) 6:1122–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb1183
37. Lowe D, Raj K. Premature aging induced by radiation exhibits pro-atherosclerotic effects mediated by epigenetic activation of CD44 expression. Aging Cell. (2014) 13:900–10. doi: 10.1111/acel.12253
38. Doyle B, Metharom P, Caplice NM. Endothelial progenitor cells. Endothelium. (2006) 13:403–10. doi: 10.1080/10623320601061656
39. Mendonca MS, Chin-Sinex H, Dhaemers R, Mead LE, Yoder MC, Ingram DA. Differential mechanisms of x-ray-induced cell death in human endothelial progenitor cells isolated from cord blood and adults. Radiat Res. (2011) 176:208–16. doi: 10.1667/RR2427.1
40. Azimzadeh O, Sievert W, Sarioglu H, Yentrapalli R, Barjaktarovic Z, Sriharshan A, et al. PPAR alpha: a novel radiation target in locally exposed Mus musculus heart revealed by quantitative proteomics. J Proteome Res. (2013) 12:2700–14. doi: 10.1021/pr400071g
41. Baker JE, Fish BL, Su J, Haworth ST, Strande JL, Komorowski RA, et al. 10 Gy total body irradiation increases risk of coronary sclerosis, degeneration of heart structure and function in a rat model. Int J Radiat Biol. (2009) 85:1089–100. doi: 10.3109/09553000903264473
42. Boerma M, Hauer-Jensen M. Preclinical research into basic mechanisms of radiation-induced heart disease. Cardiol Res Pract. (2010) 2011:858262. doi: 10.4061/2011/858262
43. Hoving S, Heeneman S, Gijbels MJ, Te Poele JA, Visser N, Cleutjens J, et al. Irradiation induces different inflammatory and thrombotic responses in carotid arteries of wildtype C57BL/6J and atherosclerosis-prone ApoE(-/-) mice. Radiother Oncol. (2012) 105:365–70. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.11.001
44. Lauk S, Kiszel Z, Buschmann J, Trott KR. Radiation-induced heart disease in rats. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (1985) 11:801–8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90314-1
45. Seemann I, Gabriels K, Visser NL, Hoving S, te Poele JA, Pol JF, et al. Irradiation induced modest changes in murine cardiac function despite progressive structural damage to the myocardium and microvasculature. Radiother Oncol. (2012) 103:143–50. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.011
46. Lee CL, Min H, Befera N, Clark D, Qi Y, Das S, et al. Assessing cardiac injury in mice with dual energy-microCT, 4D-microCT, and microSPECT imaging after partial heart irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2014) 88:686–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.238
47. Ghobadi G, van der Veen S, Bartelds B, de Boer RA, Dickinson MG, de Jong JR, et al. Physiological interaction of heart and lung in thoracic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2012) 84:e639–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2362
48. van Luijk P, Faber H, Meertens H, Schippers JM, Langendijk JA, Brandenburg S, et al. The impact of heart irradiation on dose-volume effects in the rat lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2007) 69:552–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.065
49. Cella L, D'Avino V, Palma G, Conson M, Liuzzi R, Picardi M, et al. Modeling the risk of radiation-induced lung fibrosis: irradiated heart tissue is as important as irradiated lung. Radiother Oncol. (2015) 117:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.051
50. Cella L, Palma G, Deasy JO, Oh JH, Liuzzi R, D'Avino V, et al. Complication probability models for radiation-induced heart valvular dysfunction: do heart-lung interactions play a role? PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e111753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111753
51. Emami B, Purdy JA, Manolis J, Barest G, Cheng E, Coia L, et al. Three-dimensional treatment planning for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (1991) 21:217–27. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90180-C
52. van Nimwegen FA, Schaapveld M, Cutter DJ, Janus CP, Krol AD, Hauptmann M, et al. Radiation dose-response relationship for risk of coronary heart disease in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. (2016) 34:235–43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4444
53. Cutter DJ, Schaapveld M, Darby SC, Hauptmann M, van Nimwegen FA, Krol AD, et al. Risk of valvular heart disease after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2015) 107:djv008. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv008
54. Taylor C, Correa C, Duane FK, Aznar MC, Anderson SJ, Bergh J, et al. Estimating the risks of breast cancer radiotherapy: evidence from modern radiation doses to the lungs and heart and from previous randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. (2017) 35:1641–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0722
55. Armstrong GT, Oeffinger KC, Chen Y, Kawashima T, Yasui Y, Leisenring W, et al. Modifiable risk factors and major cardiac events among adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2013) 31:3673–80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3205
56. Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, Henry KS, Mackey HT, Cowens-Alvarado RL, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of clinical oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. J Clin Oncol. (2016) 34:611–35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3809
57. Adams MJ, Lipshultz SE. Pathophysiology of anthracycline- and radiation-associated cardiomyopathies: implications for screening and prevention. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2005) 44:600–6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20352
58. Tolba KA, Deliargyris EN. Cardiotoxicity of cancer therapy. Cancer Invest. (1999) 17:408–22. doi: 10.3109/07357909909021433
59. Chang HM, Okwuosa TM, Scarabelli T, Moudgil R, Yeh ETH. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: best practices in diagnosis, prevention, and management: part 2. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 70:2552–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1095
60. van Nimwegen FA, Schaapveld M, Janus CP, Krol AD, Petersen EJ, Raemaekers JM, et al. Cardiovascular disease after Hodgkin lymphoma treatment: 40-year disease risk. JAMA Intern Med. (2015) 175:1007–17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180
61. Michel L, Rassaf T, Totzeck M. Biomarkers for the detection of apparent and subclinical cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity. J Thorac Dis. (2018) 10:S4282–S95. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.15
62. Michel L, Mincu RI, Mahabadi AA, Settelmeier S, Al-Rashid F, Rassaf T, et al. Troponins and brain natriuretic peptides for the prediction of cardiotoxicity in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. (2019) 22:350–61. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0328
63. Armenian SH, Hudson MM, Mulder RL, Chen MH, Constine LS, Dwyer M, et al. Recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol. (2015) 16:e123–36. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70409-7
64. Armenian SH, Lacchetti C, Lenihan D. Prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Summary. J Oncol Pract. (2017) 13:270–5. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.018770
65. Rassaf T, Totzeck M. Modern concepts in cardio-oncology. J Thorac Dis. (2018) 10:S4386–90. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.110
66. Michel L, Rassaf T. Cardio-oncology: need for novel structures. Eur J Med Res. (2019) 24:1. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0359-0
67. D'Errico MP, Petruzzelli MF, Gianicolo EA, Grimaldi L, Loliva F, Tramacere F, et al. Kinetics of B-type natriuretic peptide plasma levels in patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with radiation therapy: results after one-year follow-up. Int J Radiat Biol. (2015) 91:804–9. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2015.1027421
68. D'Errico MP, Grimaldi L, Petruzzelli MF, Gianicolo EA, Tramacere F, Monetti A, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide plasma levels as a potential biomarker for cardiac damage after radiotherapy in patients with left-sided breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2012) 82:e239–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.058
69. de Leve S, Wirsdorfer F, Jendrossek V. The CD73/Ado system-a new player in RT induced adverse late effects. Cancers. (2019) 11:1578. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101578
70. Verma V, Shah C, Mehta MP. Clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton radiotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. (2016) 16:145–54. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.006
71. Taylor A, Powell ME. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy–what is it? Cancer Imaging. (2004) 4:68–73. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0003
72. Yarom R, Harper IS, Wynchank S, van Schalkwyk D, Madhoo J, Williams K, et al. Effect of captopril on changes in rats' hearts induced by long-term irradiation. Radiat Res. (1993) 133:187–97. doi: 10.2307/3578356
73. Menezes KM, Wang H, Hada M, Saganti PB. Radiation matters of the heart: a mini review. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2018) 5:83. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00083
74. Totzeck M, Mincu RI, Heusch G, Rassaf T. Heart failure from cancer therapy: can we prevent it? ESC Heart Fail. (2019) 6:856–62. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12493
75. Inano H, Suzuki K, Onoda M, Wakabayashi K. Anti-carcinogenic activity of simvastatin during the promotion phase of radiation-induced mammary tumorigenesis of rats. Carcinogenesis. (1997) 18:1723–7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.9.1723
Keywords: radiation therapy, irradiation, cardio-oncology, cardiotoxicity, cardiovascular damage, cancer therapy
Citation: Mrotzek SM, Rassaf T and Totzeck M (2020) Cardiovascular Damage Associated With Chest Irradiation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 7:41. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00041
Received: 27 December 2019; Accepted: 03 March 2020;
Published: 20 March 2020.
Edited by:
Carlo Gabriele Tocchetti, University of Naples Federico II, ItalyReviewed by:
Alessandra Cuomo, Federico II University Hospital, ItalyLaura Cella, Italian National Research Council, Italy
Copyright © 2020 Mrotzek, Rassaf and Totzeck. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Matthias Totzeck, matthias.totzeck@uk-essen.de