Endocrine Journal
Online ISSN : 1348-4540
Print ISSN : 0918-8959
ISSN-L : 0918-8959
ORIGINALS
Relationship between patterns of calcification in thyroid nodules and histopathologic findings
Bu Kyung KimYoung Sik ChoiHye Jung KwonJun Seop LeeJae Joon HeoYou Jin HanYo-Han ParkJeong Hoon Kim
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2013 Volume 60 Issue 2 Pages 155-160

Details
Abstract

Various patterns of calcification have been detected in benign and malignant thyroid nodules on ultrasonography (US). Microcalcification has been found to be highly associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma. However, other patterns of calcification have unclear clinical significance. The aim of this study was to evaluate which pattern of calcification could be predictive of malignancy. A total of 1,431 thyroid nodules of 1,078 patients who received preoperative ultrasound examinations and subsequently underwent thyroidectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The types of calcification were defined as follows: microcalcification, annular-like peripheral calcification, crescent-like peripheral calcification, intranodular coarse calcification, and calcified spot. Of these 1,431 nodules, 1,305 (91.1%) were thyroid carcinomas and 126 (8.9%) were benign nodules. Calcifications were detected in 38.6% (552/1,431) of all nodules. Calcifications were found in 40.2% (524/1,305) of malignant nodules and 22.2% (28/126) of benign nodules. Of the 524 malignant nodules with calcification, microcalcification was the most common pattern, occurring in 42.9% (225/524), and annular type was the least common pattern, occurring in 5.9% (31/524). Among the calcification types, only microcalcification and intranodular had a significant association with malignancy (p = 0.001, 0.035), with OR values of 3.5 (95% CI, 1.6-7.7) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-5.6). Though using the patterns of calcification alone for predicting malignancy had limitation, microcalcification and intranodular calcification were significantly associated with malignancy.

Content from these authors
© The Japan Endocrine Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top