Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Vaginal versus Obstetric Infection Escherichia coli Isolates among Pregnant Women: Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Virulence Profile

  • Emma Sáez-López,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • Elisabet Guiral,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • Dietmar Fernández-Orth,

    Affiliation ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • Sonia Villanueva,

    Affiliation ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • Anna Goncé,

    Affiliations BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Barcelona, Spain, Institut D´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (DIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain

  • Marta López,

    Affiliations BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Barcelona, Spain, Institut D´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (DIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain

  • Irene Teixidó,

    Affiliations BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Barcelona, Spain, Institut D´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (DIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain

  • Anna Pericot,

    Affiliations BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Barcelona, Spain, Institut D´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (DIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain

  • Francesc Figueras,

    Affiliations BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Barcelona, Spain, Institut D´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (DIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain

  • Montse Palacio,

    Affiliations BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Barcelona, Spain, Institut D´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (DIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain

  • Teresa Cobo,

    Affiliations BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Barcelona, Spain, Institut D´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (DIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain

  • Jordi Bosch,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • Sara M. Soto

    sara.soto@isglobal.org

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Vaginal Escherichia coli colonization is related to obstetric infections and the consequent development of infections in newborns. Ampicillin resistance among E. coli strains is increasing, which is the main choice for treating empirically many obstetric and neonatal infections. Vaginal E. coli strains are very similar to extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli with regards to the virulence factors and the belonging to phylogroup B2. We studied the antimicrobial resistance and the genetic virulence profile of 82 E. coli isolates from 638 vaginal samples and 63 isolated from endometrial aspirate, placental and amniotic fluid samples from pregnant women with obstetric infections. The prevalence of E. coli in the vaginal samples was 13%, which was significant among women with associated risk factors during pregnancy, especially premature preterm rupture of membranes (p<0.0001). Sixty-five percent of the strains were ampicillin-resistant. The E. coli isolates causing obstetric infections showed higher resistance levels than vaginal isolates, particularly for gentamicin (p = 0.001). The most prevalent virulence factor genes were those related to the iron uptake systems revealing clear targets for interventions. More than 50% of the isolates belonged to the virulent B2 group possessing the highest number of virulence factor genes. The ampicillin-resistant isolates had high number of virulence factors primarily related to pathogenicity islands, and the remarkable gentamicin resistance in E. coli isolates from women presenting obstetric infections, the choice of the most appropriate empiric treatment and clinical management of pregnant women and neonates should be carefully made. Taking into account host-susceptibility, the heterogeneity of E. coli due to evolution over time and the geographical area, characterization of E. coli isolates colonizing the vagina and causing obstetric infections in different regions may help to develop interventions and avoid the aetiological link between maternal carriage and obstetric and subsequent puerperal infections.

Introduction

Escherichia coli are reported as one of the most common organisms found in the genital tract of non-pregnant (9–28%) and pregnant women (24–31%). Vaginal E. coli (VEC) strains are considered to be a reservoir for vaginal and/or endocervical colonization in pregnant women, and an important step in the development of urinary tract, intra-amniotic and puerperal infections through ‘fecal-vaginal-urinary/neonatal’ transmission [1,2]. Histologically, subclinically or clinically diagnosed chorioamnionitis is an obstetric infection caused principally by ascending microorganisms from the vagina which may lead to maternal or foetal complications, including postpartum endometritis, bacteraemia or sepsis. E. coli is considered to be normally involved in these infections despite their polymicrobial susceptibility [3].

The most frequent antibiotic treatment for preterm rupture of membranes, suspected chorioamnionitis or neonatal sepsis and bacterial meningitis is ampicillin plus an aminoglycoside, normally gentamicin, whereas for postpartum endometritis, clindamycin or ampicillin plus gentamicin are prescribed. Nevertheless, an increase of treatment failure has been observed due to the high percentage of ampicillin resistance found among E. coli strains [4].

The status of the immune system and host susceptibility play an important role in the outcome of an infection and disease progression [5]. However, extraintestinal infection is associated with a broad range of virulence factors (VFs) including adhesins, toxins, siderophores and invasins, among others [68]. VEC strains share a virulence factor profile with extraintestinal pathogenic isolates of E. coli (ExPEC), which are different from commensal flora and allow them to colonize, avoid defense mechanisms and cause extra-intestinal infections [1], [5,6], [9].

Most ExPEC are assigned to the virulent phylogenetic group B2, followed by group D, whilst groups A and B1 are frequently associated with commensal strains based on the old classification created by Clermont et al. [10]. Similar results have been observed for E. coli isolates causing bacteraemia among pregnant women and urinary tract infections (UTIs) with the revised method [1113]

Due to the selective pressure in the habitats, commensal E. coli can turn into virulent and resistant strains [14]. VEC isolates from pregnant women may be related to obstetric infections and the consequent development of infections in newborns. In addition, these strains may be resistant to empiric treatment resulting in therapeutic failure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize and compare 145 E. coli isolates from vaginal samples (colonizing) and samples of women with obstetric infections in terms of antimicrobial resistance, phylotype and the virulence profile in order to determine their virulence potential.

Materials and Methods

Clinical Sample Collection and Isolation of E. coli

Two types of isolates were collected from pregnant women at the Maternity Fetal Medicine Department of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Fig 1). On one hand, a total of 638 vaginal samples were collected on one of the antenatal visits from February 2011 to June 2013. These vaginal samples included (A) 603 from pregnant women with normal gestation and (B) 35 from pregnant women with associated risk at delivery (premature preterm rupture of membranes or preterm labour). On the other hand, 63 E. coli isolates were collected from endometrial aspirate, amniotic fluid or placenta of pregnant women with obstetric infections, including postpartum endometritis and clinical or subclinical intraamniotic infection from February 2011 to December 2014. The “Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica (CEIC)” of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, formed by Dr. Begoña López Pérez and Dr. Joan Albert Barberá Mir, approved the project (Ref. 2010/5720) and all women provided informed signed consent. All the samples were spread onto MacConkey Agar and incubated at 37°C overnight. Suspected colonies were confirmed by MALDI-TOF.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Diagram flow of the clinical sample collection.

*PROM: Premature Rupture of Membranes; **pPROM: preterm PROM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146531.g001

Antimicrobial Resistance

Resistance profiles were determined using the standard Kirby-Bauer disk-diffusion method. The antimicrobial agents tested were ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC), cefuroxime (CXM), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), imipenem (IPM), tetracycline (TET), trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (SXT), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), chloramphenicol (CHL), and fosfomycin (FOF). In addition, an Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) confirmatory test using CTX, AMC and CAZ was carried out [15]. The results were interpreted following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [16] and the E. coli ATCC25922 strain was used as the control.

Prevalence of virulence factors genes

The virulence profile was analysed by PCR using gene-specific primers for 13 genes encoding virulence determinants usually associated with extraintestinal E. coli strains. The genes studied included: hemolysin (hlyA), cytotoxic necrotizing factor (cnf1), autotrasporter toxin (sat1), P- fimbriae (papA, -EF, -C), type 1-C fimbriae (focG), heat-resistant hemagglutinin (hra), yersiniabactin (fyuA), siderophores (iutA and iroN), aerobactin (iucC) and invasion of brain endothelium factor (ibeA) [17]. PCR was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, the corresponding annealing temperature (55–63°) for 30 s, an extension at 72°C for 1 min and 30 s, and a final elongation at 72°C for 7 min. The amplification products were separated in 1.5% agarose gels and stained with Syber Safe. A 100-bp DNA ladder was used in each gel as a molecular size marker. Several strains previously characterized in terms of virulence in our laboratory were used as positive controls. The results were considered to be positive if the amplification product was similar to the expected molecular size.

Phylogenetic analysis

The new and improved E. coli phylo-typing method with several modifications described by Clermont at al. [13] was used to identify E. coli isolates belonging to the eight phylogroups (B2, D, B1, A, E, Non-typeable, F, C, and E clade 1). A simplex PCR method was utilized to determine the arpA, chuA, yjaA and TspE4.C2 genes and the concentration of the primers was 5μM instead of a quadruplex-PCR with a concentration of 20 μM.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software for Windows, version 20.0. Comparisons of associations between antibiotic susceptibility, the phylogenetic group and the presence of virulence factor genes (VFGs) were made using the chi-square test when all the expected cell frequencies were ≥ 5, the chi-square with Yates’ correction when the number of expected cases was between 3 (inclusive) and 5 and the Fisher’s exact test when the number of expected cases was below 3 in at least one group. A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p-values below 0.01 were highly significant.

Results

Prevalence of E.coli among the vaginal samples

Among the 638 vaginal samples collected, 82 isolates (13%) were positive for E. coli, and this was statistically or highly significant among women belonging to group B compared to group A (n = 13, 37% versus n = 69, 11% respectively; p = 0.0001) (Table 1). In addition, premature preterm rupture of membranes (pPROM) was the most prevalent risk factor (n = 12, 92%) among pregnant women with infection by E. coli.

thumbnail
Table 1. Prevalence of Escherichia coli among vaginal samples from pregnant women with normal gestation (A) and some risks at birth (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146531.t001

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Sixteen obstetric infection E. coli (obstetric IEC) (25%) and 29 VEC isolates (5%) were susceptible to all the antimicrobial agents tested. Ninety-five (65.5%) of all the isolates were resistant to ampicillin. Obstetric IEC isolates showed higher percentages of resistance to all the antibiotics than VEC isolates except for imipenem (only one vaginal resistant isolate), which was highly significant for gentamicin (22.2% versus 3.7%, respectively; p = 0.001) (Fig 2). The presence of ESBLs was only found in one isolate from a pregnant woman with puerperal endometritis harbouring the CTX-M-15 enzyme.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distribution of antimicrobial resistance among VEC and obstetric IEC isolates.

VEC isolates: vaginal Escherichia coli isolates; Obstetric IEC isolates: obstetric infection Escherichia coli isolates. AMP, ampicillin; AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CXM, cefuroxime, CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; IPM, imipenem; TET, tetracycline, SXT, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole; AMK, amikacin; GEN, gentamicin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin and FOF, fosfomycin. (**p-value = 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146531.g002

Prevalence of virulence factor genes

Among all the isolates, the most prevalent VFGs were those related to the iron uptake systems: fyuA (79.3%), iucC (55.9%) and iutA (53.8%) (Table 2). No significant differences were found between obstetric IEC and VEC isolates apart from invasin ibeA which was more frequently found among VEC isolates (n = 13, 15.9% versus n = 2, 3.2%, p = 0.014). The VFG less frequently found in all the isolates was focG (VEC: 11%, obstetric IEC: 6%).

thumbnail
Table 2. Prevalence of virulence factor genes (VFGs) according to the type of isolate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146531.t002

Phylogenetic group distribution

Seventy-six (52%) of all the isolates belonged to the B2 group and to a lesser extent to groups A and E (15% and 12%, respectively) (Fig 3). The presence of the other phylo-groups was lower, being 21% of the remaining phylo-groups. Significant differences were found when phylo-group B2 was compared with all the others separately (p<0.01 in all cases), but no differences were observed between VEC and obstetric IEC isolates.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Distribution of phylogenetic groups among the isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146531.g003

Relationship between the phylogenetic group, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance

Statistically significant differences were found in the presence of VFGs among isolates belonging to phylogenetic group B2, being hlyA (p<0.0001), cnf1 (p<0.0001), papA (p = 0.003), papC (p = 0.011), focG (p = 0.002), hra (p = 0.009), fyuA (p<0.0001) and ibeA (p = 0.001) the most representative of this group regarding all the isolates, whereas iutA and iucC were more frequently observed among the non-B2 groups (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Prevalence of virulence factor genes (VFGs) among the phylogenetic groups and the type of isolates according to their ampicillin resistance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146531.t003

Ampicillin-resistant VEC isolates showed a greater number of VFs in comparison with ampicillin-susceptible isolates, being highly significant for the hlyA (p = 0.001), cnf1 (p = 0.001), papEF (p = 0.01), hra (p = 0.005), fyuA (p = 0.001), and iroN (p<0.001) genes. However, VFGs tended to be more frequent among ampicillin-susceptible obstetric IEC isolates. Iron acquisition systems, such as fyuA and iroN, were also significantly more prevalent among tetracycline-resistant VEC isolates than their susceptible counterparts (fyuA: p = 0.023 and iroN: p = 0.008). However, tetracycline-resistant isolates from obstetric infection showed fewer VFs, being significant for hlyA (p = 0.009), cnf1 (p = 0.019), papA (p = 0.005) and papC (p = 0.014). In addition, the aerobactin synthesis gene iucC was significantly more frequently found among the tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin and chloramphenicol-resistant isolates in comparison with the susceptible isolates. No highly significant differences were found in the distribution of the phylotype and antimicrobial agents.

Discussion

The prevalence of vaginal E. coli found in this study was 13% similar to results of previous studies [17,18], but lower than in others [19]. In addition, the noteworthy percentage of maternal E. coli carriers suggests that vaginal E. coli colonization is a risk factor for pPROM and preterm birth [20,21] as well as the starting point for progression to severe infection [11].

A review of the current empiric treatment may be necessary, considering the high prevalence of ampicillin and gentamicin resistance in E. coli isolates collected from women with postpartum endometritis and intraamniotic infection, in agreement with previous reports [18], [22]. Therefore, the use of cephalosporines as first-line therapy for the treatment of mothers and neonates may be effective due to the high percentages of susceptibility [7], [23] and good outcomes shown in the treatment of peripartum sepsis [24]. Nevertheless, the geographical area should also be taken into account because of the particular increase in infections due to ESBL-producing organisms worldwide [18], [25], especially in developing countries [26].

The high presence of iron acquisition systems among the isolates was notable, with yersiniabactin (fyuA) being the most prevalent VFG among all the isolates (VEC: 80%, obstetric IEC: 76%), in contrast with earlier obstetric IEC isolates from the same hospital (only 18%) [22]. The direct links to iron-limited environments [27] and virulence as well as invasiveness have previously been confirmed by studies in bacteraemic E. coli strains [6]. It has been demonstrated that iron obtained through iron-uptake systems, such as heme, aerobactin, yersiniabactin or siderophores is necessary in UTIs and these systems show specific functions depending on the anatomical site [28] and may be targets for interventions, such as vaccines [29,30].

Higher percentages of genes associated with pathogenicity islands (PAIs), such as the hlyA, cnf1 and pap- genes [31], have been observed among isolates from skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) [7], causing neonatal sepsis [32] as well as from patients with different sources of bacteraemia [8]. The relatively low frequency of these genes in our study is similar to that of VEC from East Japan, but lower than in strains from West Japan [1], United States [33], Slovenia [34] or Barcelona [17], suggesting the heterogeneity of E. coli strains to geographical area. However, the prevalence of the toxin cnf1 was higher than that found in previous obstetric IEC isolates from our hospital (25% vs. 9%) [22]. In contrast to other studies [1], [8], [32], [35], the least prevalent VFGs were focG and ibeA, being found in less than 10% of obstetric infection isolates. Unlike previous obstetric IEC isolates, isolates causing sepsis presented the same percentage of the invasin ibeA than VEC in this study [22].

Similar to the results of other studies, more than half of the isolates in the present study belonged to virulence group B2 [11], [17]. The relevant statistically percentage of strains belonging to group A considerably differed from that reported by Iranpour et al. [12]. Surprisingly, group E and non-typeable strains were frequently observed compared to the results of Clermont et al. [13], which may be due to the great diversity, the extreme peculiarity or a recombination between phylo-groups among E. coli strains.

Group B2 presented the highest number of VFs among all the strains, in agreement with other studies performed in strains isolated from extraintestinal sites [5], [7], [36]. In contrast to prior findings, ciprofloxacin-resistant strains did not belong to non-B2 phylogenetic groups and neither did they show a loss of VFs related to PAIs [7], [3739] However, the lower presence of these VFGs among tetracycline-resistant isolates causing obstetric infections was concordant with the results of Soto et al. [39]. Furthermore, the selection of ampicillin-resistant strains presenting high rates of VFs has been previously shown by Petkovsek et al. [7]. Regardless of the ecological and host-dependent factors with respect to the severity of infection [6], [34], these strains have been shown to cause obstetric and neonatal infections and may have a serious clinical impact [4], [40].

The present study has some limitations since data on characterization of vaginal and obstetric infections E. coli strains are scarce, and many comparisons are made using other types of extraintestinal isolates. However, besides the virulence profile of VEC resembling that of ExPEC isolates, our findings are useful to generate relevant hypotheses on this little-known topic because of the relationship of a wide range of VFs and antimicrobial agents with the new phylogenetic analysis.

In conclusion, vaginal E. coli colonization may be a risk factor for complications during pregnancy, especially if these strains are ampicillin-resistant and show many virulence factors resulting in treatment failure or infections. Therefore, it is important to know the resistance and virulence associated with E. coli strains from different anatomic sites [2] in order to determine the probability and the severity of infection these strains may cause. The characterization of E. coli isolates which colonize the vagina and cause obstetric infections may be especially of help to develop interventions, and avoid the causal link between maternal carriage and obstetric and subsequent puerperal infections.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Olivier Clermont, who kindly provided some of the reference E. coli strains for the phylogenetic analysis

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SMS JB AG ML. Performed the experiments: ESL EG SV. Analyzed the data: DFO SMS JB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SMS. Wrote the paper: SMS ESL JB AG ML IT AP FF MP TC.

References

  1. 1. Obata-Yasuoka M, Ba-Thein W, Tsukamoto T, Yoshikawa H, Hayashi H. Vaginal Escherichia coli share common virulence factor profiles, serotypes and phylogeny with other extraintestinal E. coli. Microbiology. 2002;148: 2745–2752. pmid:12213921
  2. 2. Watt S, Lanotte P, Mereghetti L, Moulin-schouleur M, Picard B, Quentin R. Escherichia coli strains from pregnant women and neonates: intraspecies genetic distribution and prevalence of virulence factors. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:1929–1935. pmid:12734229
  3. 3. Edwards RK. Chorioamnionitis and labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2005. pp. 287–296. pmid:15899361
  4. 4. Sáez-López E., Guiral E. Soto SM. Neonatal sepsis by bacteria: a big problem for children. Clin Microbiol Open Access. OMICS Group; 2012;02.
  5. 5. Picard B, Garcia JS, Gouriou S, Duriez P, Brahimi N, Bingen E, et al. The link between phylogeny and virulence in Escherichia coli extraintestinal infection. Infect Immun. 1999;67: 546–553. pmid:9916057
  6. 6. Johnson JR, Stell AL. Extended virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli strains from patients with urosepsis in relation to phylogeny and host compromise. J Infect Dis. 2000;181: 261–272. pmid:10608775
  7. 7. Petkovsek Z, Elersic K, Gubina M, Zgur-Bertok D, Starcic Erjavec M. Virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolates from skin and soft tissue infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47: 1811–1817. pmid:19357208
  8. 8. Johnson JR, Bryan TTO, Kuskowski M, Maslow JN. Ongoing horizontal and vertical transmission of virulence genes and papA alleles among Escherichia coli blood isolates from patients with diverse-source bacteremia. Infect Immun. 2001;
  9. 9. Russo TA, Johnson JR. Proposal for a new inclusive designation for extraintestinal pathogenic isolates of Escherichia coli: ExPEC. J Infect Dis. 2000;181: 1753–4. pmid:10823778
  10. 10. Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66: 4555–4558. pmid:11010916
  11. 11. Lefort A, Mentr F. Escherichia coli bacteraemia in pregnant women is life-threatening for foetuses. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:01035–41.
  12. 12. Iranpour D, Hassanpour M, Ansari H, Tajbakhsh S, Khamisipour G, Najafi A. Phylogenetic Groups of Escherichia coli Strains from patients with urinary tract infection in iran based on the new clermont phylotyping method. BioMed Research Intern. 2015;2015: 5–12.
  13. 13. Clermont O, Christenson JK, Denamur E, Gordon DM. The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo-typing method revisited: Improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013;5: 58–65. pmid:23757131
  14. 14. Brown NF, Wickham ME, Coombes BK, Finlay BB. Crossing the line: selection and evolution of virulence traits. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2(5):e42 pmid:16733541
  15. 15. Kałużna E. Zalas-Więcek P, Gospodarek E. Comparison of detection methods for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli strains Postey Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2014. 68:808–13
  16. 16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-fourth information supplement, M100-S24, vol. 34, no. 1. 2014. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. T.
  17. 17. Guiral E, Bosch J, Vila J, Soto SM. Prevalence of Escherichia coli among samples collected from the genital tract in pregnant and nonpregnant women: relationship with virulence. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;314: 170–173. pmid:21133987
  18. 18. Villar HE, Aubert V, Baserni MN, Jugo MB. Maternal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates in Argentina. J Chemother. 2013;25: 324–7. pmid:24091027
  19. 19. Tamelienė R, Barčaitė E, Stonienė D, Buinauskienė J, Markūnienė E, Kudrevičienė A, et al. Escherichia coli colonization in neonates: prevalence, perinatal transmission, antimicrobial susceptibility, and risk factors. Medicina (Kaunas). 2012;48: 71–6.
  20. 20. Krohn M, Thwin SS, Rabe LK, Brown Z, Hillier SL. Vaginal colonization by Escherichia coli as a risk factor for very low birth weight delivery and other perinatal complications. J Infect Dis. 1997;175: 606–10. pmid:9041332
  21. 21. Rani S, Mehra R, Gupta V, Huria A, Chander J. Vaginal flora in preterm premature rupture of membranes and their sensitivity to commonly used antibiotics. Asian J. of Medical Sciences. 2014;5: 58–60.
  22. 22. Guiral E, Sáez-López E, Bosch J, Goncé A, López M, Sanz S, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence characterization among Escherichia coli clinical isolates causing severe obstetric infections in pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53: 1745–7. pmid:25740771
  23. 23. Van den Hoogen A, Gerards LJ, Verboon-Maciolek MA, Fleer A, Krediet TG. Long-term trends in the epidemiology of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic susceptibility of causative agents. Neonatology. 2010;97: 22–28. pmid:19571584
  24. 24. Kankuri E, Kurki T, Carlson P, Hiilesmaa V. Incidence, treatment and outcome of peripartum sepsis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82: 730–735. pmid:12848644
  25. 25. Livermore DM. Current epidemiology and growing resistance of Gram-negative pathogens. Korean J Intern Med. 2012;27: 128–142. pmid:22707882
  26. 26. Shariff V A AR, Shenoy M S, Yadav T, M R. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of uropathogenic Escherichia coli, with special reference to the fluoroquinolones. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7: 1027–30. pmid:23905095
  27. 27. Hancock V, Ferrières L, Klemm P. The ferric yersiniabactin uptake receptor FyuA is required for efficient biofilm formation by urinary tract infectious Escherichia coli in human urine. Microbiology. 2008;154: 167–175. pmid:18174135
  28. 28. Garcia EC, Brumbaugh AR, Mobley HLT. Redundancy and specificity of Escherichia coli iron acquisition systems during urinary tract infection. Infect Immun. 2011;79: 1225–35. pmid:21220482
  29. 29. Bauer HW, Shams H, Bauer RM. Vaccination against urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli. 2013;2013: 487–492.
  30. 30. Porcheron G, Garénaux A, Proulx J, Sabri M, Dozois CM. Iron, copper, zinc, and manganese transport and regulation in pathogenic Enterobacteria: correlations between strains, site of infection and the relative importance of the different metal transport systems for virulence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3: 90. pmid:24367764
  31. 31. Schmidt H, Hensel M. Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17: 14–56. pmid:14726454
  32. 32. Soto SM, Bosch J, Jimenez de Anta MT, Vila J. Comparative study of virulence traits of Escherichia coli clinical isolates causing early and late neonatal sepsis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46: 1123–1125. pmid:18160454
  33. 33. Cook SW, Hammill HA, Hull RA. Virulence factors of Escherichia coli isolated from female reproductive tract infections and neonatal sepsis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2001;9: 203–7. pmid:11916176
  34. 34. Birosová E, Siegfried L, Kmet’ová M, Makara a, Ostró a, Gresová a, et al. Detection of virulence factors in alpha-haemolytic Escherichia coli strains isolated from various clinical materials. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10: 569–73. pmid:15191387
  35. 35. Guiral E, Bosch J, Vila J, Soto SM. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli strains causing neonatal sepsis between 1998 and 2008. Chemotherapy. 2012;58: 123–8. pmid:22572070
  36. 36. Escobar-Páramo P, Clermont O, Blanc-Potard A-B, Bui H, Le Bouguénec C, Denamur E. A specific genetic background is required for acquisition and expression of virulence factors in Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21: 1085–1094. pmid:15014151
  37. 37. Johnson JR, Kuskowski MA, O’bryan TT, Colodner R, Raz R. Virulence genotype and phylogenetic origin in relation to antibiotic resistance profile among Escherichia coli urine sample isolates from Israeli women with acute uncomplicated cystitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49: 26–31. pmid:15616271
  38. 38. Moreno E, Prats G, Sabaté M, Pérez T, Johnson JR, Andreu A. Quinolone, fluoroquinolone and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in relation to virulence determinants and phylogenetic background among uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57: 204–11. pmid:16390858
  39. 39. Soto SM, De Anta MTJ, Vila J. Quinolones induce partial or total loss of pathogenicity islands in uropathogenic Escherichia coli by SOS-dependent or -independent pathways, respectively. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:649–53 pmid:16436722
  40. 40. Hart A, Nowicki BJ, Reisner B, Pawelczyk E, Goluszko P, Urvil P, et al. Ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli in gestational pyelonephritis: increased occurrence and association with the colonization factor Dr adhesin. J Infect Dis. 2001;183: 1526–1529. pmid:11319690