Figures
Abstract
Background
Hemoglobin (Hb) levels are regarded as an important determinant of outcome in a number of cancers treated with radiotherapy. However, for patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), information regarding the prognostic value of hemoglobin level is scarce.
Patients and Methods
A total of 650 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), enrolled between May, 2005, and November, 2012, were included in this study. The prognostic significance of hemoglobin level (anemia or no-anemia) at three different time points was investigated, including before treatment, during treatment and at the last week of treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the log–rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.
Results
The 5-year OS (overall survival) rate of patients who were anemia and no-anemia before treatment were 89.1%, and 80.7% (P = 0.01), respectively. The 5-year DMFS (distant metastasis-free survival) rate of patients who were anemia and no-anemia before treatment were 88.9%, and 78.2% (P = 0.01), respectively. The 5-year OS rate of patients who were anemia and no-anemia during treatment were 91.7% and 83.3% (P = 0.004). According to multivariate analysis, the pre-treatment Hb level predicted a decreased DMFS (P = 0.007, HR = 2.555, 95% CI1.294–5.046). Besides, the mid-treatment Hb level predicted a decreased OS (P = 0.013, HR = 2.333, 95% CI1.199–4.541).
Citation: Guo S-S, Tang L-Q, Chen Q-Y, Zhang L, Liu L-T, Huang P-Y, et al. (2015) Is Hemoglobin Level in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Still a Significant Prognostic Factor in the Era of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Technology? PLoS ONE 10(8): e0136033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136033
Editor: Daniele Santini, University Campus Bio-Medico, ITALY
Received: December 17, 2014; Accepted: July 30, 2015; Published: August 27, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (No.81425018), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81072226), the 863 Project (No. 2012AA02A501), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2013CB910304), the Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2011B080701034 and No. 2012B031800364), the Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou City (No. 2011J4300100), the Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is rare globally, but it is epidemic in southern China and Southeast Asia [1]. The crude incidence of NPC was 3.61 cases per 100,000 people in 2009 according to data from regions covered by cancer registries [2]. The vast majority of NPCs are poorly differentiated, while a minority are well-differentiated squamous-cell carcinomas [3]. There is a strong association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and NPC [3–5]. Radiotherapy is the primary therapy used and, when applied in combination with chemotherapy, is regarded to be the first-line treatment for locoregionally advanced NPC [6, 7].
Hemoglobin (Hb) levels are regarded as an important determinant of outcome in a number of cancers treated with radiotherapy, particularly gynecological tumors and head and neck cancers [8–10]. Several studies have shown a positive relationship between Hb level and survival outcomes after three-dimensional radiotherapy in NPC [11–13]. However, patients received conventional radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in upon studies.
The increasingly widespread use of IMRT technology in NPC patients over the past decades has improved the treatment outcomes when compared with conventional radiotherapy, especially in local disease control [14–16]. Information regarding the prognostic value of hemoglobin levels for patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is, however, scarce. Therefore, it is important to explore the prognostic value of Hb in NPC patients in the setting of IMRT. We conducted a retrospective study in NPC patients treated with IMRT, to investigate the significance of hemoglobin level on the outcome of improved radiotherapy treatment.
Methods and Materials
Patients and variables
A total of 650 patients (of which 473 were male and 177 were female, with a sex ratio of 2.7:1) who met the following criteria for NPC between May 2005 and November 2012 were included in this retrospective study: (1) histologically proven NPC by biopsy of the nasopharynx; (2) no distant metastasis; (3) no treatment prior to admission; (4) no other tumours or serious illnesses; (5) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤2; and (6) received radical IMRT during the course of treatment. Participants underwent a pre-treatment evaluation that included a complete patient history, a routine physical examination, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck, a fibre optic endoscope examination of the nasopharynx, and haematological and biochemical tests. Chest radiography, abdominal ultrasonography and bone scintigraphy were used to exclude distant metastases. All participants were restaged according to the 2010 Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institution, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.
The Hb value of patients was detected in each week since treatment. Pre-treatment Hb level was defined as the Hb value detected before treatment. The mid-treatment Hb level was calculated as the average of Hb levels measured in the first week before radiotherapy through the last week of treatment. The post-treatment Hb level was defined as the Hb value at the last week of treatment. Anemia was defined according to World Health Organization criteria as hemoglobin <130 g/L in men and <120 g/L in women. No patients received erythropoietin therapy. Individual difference value (ΔHb) of Hb level from pre-treatment to post-treatment was equal to (pre-treatment Hb value)-(post-treatment Hb value). Hb continuous decrease was defined as pre-treatment Hb > mid- treatment Hb > post- treatment Hb.
Treatment
Patients were treated with radical IMRT delivered as five fractions per week. Target volumes were contoured according to our institutional treatment protocol [17], in agreement with the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Reports 50 and 62. The patients received a total radiation dose of 68–70 Gy to the gross tumor volume given in 30–33 fractions (2.12–2.33 Gy per fraction). The radiation dose to the neck lymph node was 66–70 Gy. The overall treatment time was 6–7 weeks. The remaining 646 patients of stage II-IV received 2–3 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin (80–100 mg/m2) delivered every 21 days. Four patients at stage I received radiotherapy alone.
Follow-up
After the completion of treatment, patients were followed up every 3 months throughout the first 3 years, every 6 months for the next 2 years and annually thereafter. The follow-up duration was calculated from the first day of treatment to either the day of death or the day of the last examination. The median follow-up period was 49 months (range, 1.3–85.5 months).
The endpoints of this study
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of treatment to death from any cause or until the date of the last follow-up. Localregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was defined as the time from the date of treatment to the absence of a primary site or neck lymph-node relapse or until the date of the last follow-up. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was defined as the time from the date of treatment to the date of the first observation of distant metastasis or until the date of the last follow-up.
Statistics
Survival curves were estimated using the product limit method of Kaplan–Meier with the log-rank test. Univariate analysis was conducted using the log-rank test, while multivariate analysis used the Cox proportional hazards model. Age (age ≤ 45 years, >45 years), gender, T stage, N stage, clinical stage, Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA (<4000 copies/ml, ≥4000 copies/ml), Hb continuous decrease (continuous decrease, no-continuous decrease), ΔHb (<2.2 g/dl, ≥2.2 g/dl), pre-treatment Hb level (anemia, no-anemia), mid-treatment Hb level (anemia, no-anemia), and post-treatment Hb level (anemia, no-anemia) were regarded as factors in the Cox proportional hazards model. Statistical analyses in this study were conducted using SPSS (version 17.0, Chicago, IL, USA). All P values were 2-sided. P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
The population of this study consisted of a sequential series of 650 patients treated with IMRT from May, 2005 to November, 2012, for NPC. The characteristics of patients in the present study are described in Table 1. Of the 650 patients, 473 were male and 177 were female, with a sex ratio of 2.7:1. The median age was 45 years, ranging from 13 to 79. 620 (95.4%) patients had WHO classification type III undifferentiated carcinomas, and 30 (4.6%) had type II. All the 650 patients had an ECOG score of 1. According to the 2010 UICC staging system of NPC, 4 (0.6%) patients were at stage I, 59 (9.1%) were at stage II, 429 (66.0%) were at stage III and 158 (24.3%) were at stage IV A-B.
Abbreviations: WHO = World Health Organization; yr = year; EBV = Epstein-Barr Virus.
Hemoglobin values
In the enrolled patients, the mean baseline Hb value of all participants was 14.1 g/dl, ranging from 7.5g/dl to 18.1 g/dl. Approximately 64 (9.8%) of patients had anemia before treatment. The mean Hb level during treatment was 12.9 g/dl, ranging from 7.4 g/dl to 15.9 g/dl. And the mean Hb level after treatment was 12.0 g/dl, with the range of 5.8 g/dl to 12.2 g/dl. There were 613 patients had Hb decreased after radiotherapy. The median Hb decrease was 2.2g/dl (range: 1.0–9.2 g/dl). We divided the Hb decreased patients into 2 groups: 295 (48.1%) had less than 2.2 g/dl, and 318 (51.9%) had ΔHb more than 2.2 g/dl (The cutoff value of ΔHb was based on the median of the maximum and minimum Hb value between pre-treatment and post-treatment). According to the Hb level before, during, and after treatment, 508 patients (78.2%) were divided into the Hb continuously decreased group (pre-treatment Hb> mid-treatment Hb> post-treatment Hb) and 142 patients (21.8%) into the non decreased group.
Age, the tumor size (T1-2, T3-4), the lymph node status (N0-1, N2-3), the clinical stage (1–2, 3–4), EBV DNA (<4000 copies/ml, ≥4000 copies/ml), the median follow-up time did not differ between the patients of no-anemia and anemia before radiotherapy, but there was a difference regarding gender (P<0.05) (Table 1).
Treatment outcomes
Across all enrolled patients, 56 (8.6%) patients developed locoregional disease recurrence, 73 (11.2%) developed distant metastasis, and 26 (4.0%) died. The 5-year survival rates of all the 650 patients were as follows: OS, 88.2% and LRFS, 95.3%. The 5-year LRFS, and DMFS rates of the different groups including pre-treatment anemia vs. pre-treatment no-anemia, mid-treatment anemia vs. mid-treatment no-anemia, Hb continuous decrease vs. noncontinuous decrease, and ΔHb < 2.2g/dl vs. ΔHb ≥ 2.2 g/dl are shown in Table 2.
Abbreviations: Hb = hemoglobin; ΔHb = ΔHb = individual differences between pre-treatment hemoglobin and post-treatment; NA = not observed events; OS = overall survival; LRFS = local regional recurrence free survival; DMFS = distant metastasis-free survival.
The 5-year OS rate of patients who were anemia and no-anemia before treatment were 89.1%, and 80.7% (P = 0.01), respectively (Fig 1). The 5-year DMFS rate of patients who were anemia and no-anemia before treatment were 88.9%, and 78.2% (P = 0.01) (Fig 2), respectively. On the other hand, the 5-year OS rate of patients who were anemia and no-anemia during treatment were 91.7% and 83.3% (P = 0.004) (Fig 3), respectively. However, post-treatment Hb level, Hb decrease level, and Hb continuous decrease were not associated with OS, LRFS and DMFS. No significant difference in OS, LRFS, and DMFS rate was found between anemia group and no-anemia group when patients were stratified according to pre-treatment and mid-treatment Hb levels, respectively. Besides, no significant difference in OS, LRFS, and DMFS rate was found between ΔHb<2.2g/dl and ΔHb≥ 2.2 g/dl group when patients were stratified according to pre-treatment and continuous decrease Hb levels, respectively.
Multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for various prognostic factors. Age (age ≤ 45 years, >45 years), gender, T stage, N stage, clinical stage, Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA (<4000 copies/ml, ≥4000 copies/ml), Hb continuous decrease (continuous decrease, no-continuous decrease), ΔHb (<2.2 g/dl, ≥2.2 g/dl), pre-treatment Hb level (anemia, no-anemia), mid-treatment Hb level (anemia, no-anemia), and post-treatment Hb level were regarded as factors in the multivariable analysis. According to multivariate analysis, the pre-treatment Hb level predicted a decreased DMFS (P = 0.007, HR = 2.555, 95% CI1.294–5.046) (Table 3). Besides, the mid-treatment Hb level predicted a decreased OS (P = 0.013, HR = 2.333, 95% CI1.199–4.541) (Table 4). Besides, gender and N stage were prognostic factors both for OS and DMFS. Pre-treatment Hb level (anemia or no-anemia), mid-treatment Hb level, post-treatment Hb level, Hb decrease and Hb continuous decrease were not associated with LRFS.
Abbreviations: Hb = hemoglobin; RR = relative risk; CI = confidence interval; ΔHb = individual differences between pre-treatment hemoglobin and post-treatment.
Abbreviations: Hb = hemoglobin; RR = relative risk; CI = confidence interval; ΔHb = individual differences between pre-treatment hemoglobin and post-treatment.
Discussion
In the past years of clinical practice, the technology of IMRT resulted in satisfactory benefits for NPC patients in outcomes. Therefore, it is reasonable to reevaluate the predictive value of the Hb level for NPC in the new era of IMRT. This study revealed that pre-treatment anemia was an independent prognostic factor for a poor DMFS, and the mid-treatment anemia was a poor prognosticator for OS.
At the time of the current analysis, to our knowledge, no study had emphasized the prognostic value of the hemoglobin level in NPC patients treated with IMRT. The present study is the first study to evaluate the prognostic value of the hemoglobin level in NPC patients treated with IMRT. Our study analyzed 650 patients treated with IMRT, which is the largest population-based sample size.
This study revealed that anemia before treatment predicts poorer DMFS, with a 2.555-fold greater risk of disease metastasis. Yet the number of studies announced a relationship between anemia and disease metastasis was scarce. However, the exact mechanism remains uncertain. The decreased ability of the blood to carry oxygen due to low haemoglobin levels of less than 12 g/dl leads to tumor hypoxia [18]. The association between anemia and poor tumor oxygenation has been described in head and neck cancers [19]. Poor oxygenation occurs in most solid tumors and is correlated with a poor prognosis because of resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy caused by hypoxia and hypoxia-induced alterations to the molecular biology of the tumor. The HIF signalling pathway and the unfolded protein response activated by hypoxia have been reported to contribute to distant tumor metastasis [20].
We found that anemia during treatment led to a decreased OS and 2.333-fold higher risk in a multivariate analysis. Notably, given that few studies in the field of NPC have evaluated hemoglobin levels during radiotherapy and the important association between hemoglobin level and clinical outcome, more attention would be paid to hemoglobin level during radiotherapy among NPC patients. This result indicated that mid-treatment Hb changes may help improve the decision making process of anemia correction treatment in clinical settings. Control of the hemoglobin level during IMRT is expected to be a vital part of management among the therapeutic process in the clinical practices on NPC patients. However, since oral iron therapy always need a few weeks to reverse anemia, the amount of time elapsed between a low measured hemoglobin level and the attainment of a normal level of hemoglobin is currently too long [21]. The treatment of anemia induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy includes red blood cell transfusions and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents [22, 23]. Consequently, hemoglobin corrections may contribute to better clinical outcomes, and future studies are expected to further confirm the role of hemoglobin corrections during treatments, such as transfusion and erythropoietin injection [24].
However, we did not find any association between Hb level and LRFS. The decrease in Hb level is not a prognostic factor for NPC patients treating with IMRT. Several researches revealed that anemia before treatment and during radiotherapy were prognostic factors for overall survival and local control on NPC patients at the time of conventional radiotherapy [11–13]. As we all know, local disease control in NPC patients is improved with the use of IMRT technology [14–16]. We surmise that Hb level did not have sufficient power to effect LRFS.
The mechanism by which anemia has influence on treatment outcomes is unknown. Hemoglobin level affects the oxygenation status in solid tumors, and an imbalance between the supply and consumption of oxygen can lead to tumor hypoxia [25]. Hypoxic areas are unevenly distributed in solid tumors with locally advanced stage [25]. A previous study showed that tumor hypoxia is common in patients with NPC and that tumor hypoxia has a role in tumor progression and resistance to treatment [26]. Solid tumors are resistant to radiation and some types of chemotherapyowing to tumor hypoxia [27, 28]. Furthermore,Alterations to gene expression and changes in the proteome and genome are induced by hypoxia. These changes may help tumor cells to survive in harmful microenvironments and nutrient deficiencies, thereby promoting cell proliferation in tumors. In addition, hypoxia is considered to induce resistance to X-rays, gamma-radiation and some types of chemotherapy, leading to treatment failures [25]. As shown in this study, hypoxia-induced decreases in the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, together with anemia-induced nutritive deprivation, results in poorer overall survival as well as distant metastasis-free survival.
There are some limitations in this study. One is that it involved a single institution and that all the participants were enrolled from a single cancer center in an area with a high incidence of the disease. It is unclear whether the results of this study could be extrapolated to an area that the incidence of NPC is lower. Multicenter trials may be able to verify the value of the hemoglobin level in locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Besides, the present study was a retrospective study. Further prospective research is needed to explore the value of Hb level in NPC treated with IMRT.
Conclusions
Hemoglobin level is a useful prognostic factor in NPC patients receiving IMRT. We report that the pre-treatment Hb level is an independent prognostic factorfor DMFS. Besides, the mid-treatment Hb level is an independent prognostic factor for OS in NPC patients in the era of IMRT. However, the continuous decrease is not a prognostic factor for NPC patients treating with IMRT.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Professor Qing Liu at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center for statistical assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: S-SG L-QT H-QM. Performed the experiments: H-QM S-SG L-QT. Analyzed the data: H-QM S-SG L-QT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Q-YC LZ L-TL P-YH K-JC LG H-YM XG M-HH M-SZ C-NQ. Wrote the paper: H-QM S-SG L-QT.
References
- 1. Chang ET, Adami HO. The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2006;15(10):1765–77. Epub 2006/10/13. pmid:17035381.
- 2. Xu ZJ, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, Zou XN, Chen WQ. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma incidence and mortality in China in 2009. Chinese journal of cancer. 2013;32(8):453–60. Epub 2013/07/19. pmid:23863562; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3845582.
- 3. Young LS, Dawson CW, Clark D, Rupani H, Busson P, Tursz T, et al. Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The Journal of general virology. 1988;69 (Pt 5):1051–65. Epub 1988/05/01. pmid:2836550.
- 4. zur Hausen H, Schulte-Holthausen H, Klein G, Henle W, Henle G, Clifford P, et al. EBV DNA in biopsies of Burkitt tumours and anaplastic carcinomas of the nasopharynx. Nature. 1970;228(5276):1056–8. Epub 1970/12/12. pmid:4320657.
- 5. Leung SF, Chan KC, Ma BB, Hui EP, Mo F, Chow KC, et al. Plasma Epstein-Barr viral DNA load at midpoint of radiotherapy course predicts outcome in advanced-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2014;25(6):1204–8. Epub 2014/03/19. pmid:24638904.
- 6. Pattle SB, Farrell PJ. The role of Epstein-Barr virus in cancer. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2006;6(11):1193–205. Epub 2006/10/20. pmid:17049016.
- 7. Gu MF, Liu LZ, He LJ, Yuan WX, Zhang R, Luo GY, et al. Sequential chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2013;132(1):215–23. Epub 2012/05/23. pmid:22610788.
- 8. Zenda S, Hironaka S, Boku N, Yamazaki K, Yasui H, Fukutomi A, et al. Impact of hemoglobin level on survival in definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4/M1 lymph node esophageal cancer. Diseases of the esophagus: official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus / ISDE. 2008;21(3):195–200. Epub 2008/04/24. pmid:18430098.
- 9. Grogan M, Thomas GM, Melamed I, Wong FL, Pearcey RG, Joseph PK, et al. The importance of hemoglobin levels during radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1999;86(8):1528–36. Epub 1999/10/20. pmid:10526282.
- 10. Munstedt K, Volzing M, Von Georgi R. Hemoglobin levels during radiation therapy and their influence on local control and survival of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Oncology reports. 2004;11(3):711–7. Epub 2004/02/10. pmid:14767527.
- 11. Gao J, Hu JY, Xia YF, Yi W, Tao YL, Li G. Continuous fall in hemoglobin level is a poor prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. Chinese journal of cancer. 2010;29(5):561–6. Epub 2010/04/30. pmid:20426909.
- 12. Gao J, Tao YL, Li G, Yi W, Xia YF. Involvement of difference in decrease of hemoglobin level in poor prognosis of Stage I and II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: implication in outcome of radiotherapy. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2012;82(4):1471–8. Epub 2011/06/29. pmid:21708429.
- 13. Chua DT, Sham JS, Choy DT. Prognostic impact of hemoglobin levels on treatment outcome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with sequential chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Cancer. 2004;101(2):307–16. Epub 2004/07/09. pmid:15241828.
- 14. Kong FF, Ying H, Du CR, Huang S, Zhou JJ, Hu CS. Effectiveness and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PloS one. 2014;9(3):e91362. Epub 2014/03/13. pmid:24608637; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3946722.
- 15. Kong F, Ying H, Huang S, Du C, Zhou J, Hu C. Preliminary results of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a retrospective study of 364 patients. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2014;271(12):3283–90. Epub 2014/02/19. pmid:24534894.
- 16. Moretto F, Rampino M, Munoz F, Ruo Redda MG, Reali A, Balcet V, et al. Conventional 2D (2DRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment. La Radiologia medica. 2014;119(8):634–41. Epub 2014/01/16. pmid:24424659.
- 17. Zhao C, Han F, Lu LX, Huang SM, Lin CG, Deng XW, et al. [Intensity modulated radiotherapy for local-regional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma]. Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer. 2004;23(11 Suppl):1532–7. Epub 2004/11/30. pmid:15566674.
- 18. Rades D, Lang S, Schild SE, Alberti W. Prognostic value of haemoglobin levels during concurrent radio-chemotherapy in the treatment of oesophageal cancer. Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)). 2006;18(2):139–44. Epub 2006/03/10. pmid:16523815.
- 19. Becker A, Stadler P, Lavey RS, Hansgen G, Kuhnt T, Lautenschlager C, et al. Severe anemia is associated with poor tumor oxygenation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2000;46(2):459–66. Epub 2000/02/08. pmid:10661354.
- 20. Mujcic H, Hill RP, Koritzinsky M, Wouters BG. Hypoxia signaling and the metastatic phenotype. Current molecular medicine. 2014;14(5):565–79. Epub 2014/06/05. pmid:24894165.
- 21. Walter CJ, Bell LT, Parsons SR, Jackson C, Borley NR, Wheeler JM. Prevalence and significance of anaemia in patients receiving long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. 2013;15(1):52–6. Epub 2012/05/31. pmid:22642876.
- 22. Yoshino I. [Treatment of cancer chemotherapy-associated anemia in Japan—conditions and issues]. Gan to kagaku ryoho Cancer & chemotherapy. 2014;41(4):426–31. Epub 2014/04/20. pmid:24743358.
- 23. Kadokura G, Katsumata N. [Treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia]. Gan to kagaku ryoho Cancer & chemotherapy. 2014;41(4):416–20. Epub 2014/04/20. pmid:24743356.
- 24. Cordella C, Luebbers HT, Rivelli V, Gratz KW, Kruse AL. An evaluation of the preoperative hemoglobin level as a prognostic factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head & neck oncology. 2011;3:35. Epub 2011/08/17. pmid:21843350; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3199902.
- 25. Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia and anemia: effects on tumor biology and treatment resistance. Transfusion clinique et biologique: journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine. 2005;12(1):5–10. Epub 2005/04/09. pmid:15814285.
- 26. Hong B, Lui VW, Hashiguchi M, Hui EP, Chan AT. Targeting tumor hypoxia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head & neck. 2013;35(1):133–45. Epub 2011/11/23. pmid:22106024.
- 27. Henke M, Bechtold C, Momm F, Dorr W, Guttenberger R. Blood hemoglobin level may affect radiosensitivity-preliminary results on acutely reacting normal tissues. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2000;48(2):339–45. Epub 2000/09/07. pmid:10974446.
- 28. Vaupel P, Thews O, Hoeckel M. Treatment resistance of solid tumors: role of hypoxia and anemia. Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England). 2001;18(4):243–59. Epub 2002/03/29. pmid:11918451.