Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T10:28:59.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legislating Change? Responses to Criminalizing Female Genital Cutting in Senegal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Bettina Shell-Duncan ,
Katherine Wander ,
Ylva Hernlund  and
Amadou Moreau
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the international community has recently promoted legislation as an important reform strategy for ending female genital cutting (FGC), there exist divergent views on its potential effects. Supporters argue that legal prohibition of FGC has a general deterrent effect, while others argue legislation can be perceived as coercive, and derail local efforts to end the practice. This study examines the range of responses observed in rural Senegal, where a 1999 anti-FGC law was imposed on communities in which the practice was being actively contested and targeted for elimination. Drawing on data from a mixed-methods study, we analyze responses in relation to two leading theories on social regulation, the law and economics and law and society paradigms, which make divergent predictions on the interplay between social norms and legal norms. Among supporters of FGC, legal norms ran counter to social norms, and did little to deter the practice, and in some instances incited reactance or drove the practice underground. Conversely, where FGC was being contested, legislation served to strengthen the stance of those contemplating or favoring abandonment. We conclude that legislation can complement other reform strategies by creating an “enabling environment” that supports those who have or wish to abandon FGC.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 803 - 835
Copyright
© 2013 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant number 0313503) and by the UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme on Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Research affiliation was provided by Dr. C. Niang through Université Cheikh Anta Diop, and by Dr. A. B. Senghore through Gambia College, Brikama Campus. Ethics approval for this study was obtained from The Gambia College in Brikama, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, University of Washington, and the World Health Organization in Geneva. Membership of our advisory committee included representatives from The Women's Bureau, The Gambian Bureau of Statistics, Worldview The Gambia, Gambia College-Brikama Campus, TANGO (an association of nongovernmental organizations), UNDP, UNICEF, and The Gambia WHO. In Senegal, we received advice and input from numerous representatives from The Population Council, Tostan, and the Senegal WHO office. Cori Mar, from the University of Washington Center for the Study of Demography and Ecology, provided valuable statistical advice. Statistical support and grant administration through the Center for the Study of Demography and Ecology was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Health and Human Development award number 5R24HD042828. We thank Molly Melching and staff at Tostan for providing us with helpful information about Tostan activity sites. We would like to acknowledge the important contributions of our hardworking and dedicated field team in Senegal and The Gambia: Alhagy Bah, Sally Bojang, Modou Dem, Ebrima Jallow, Serreh Jebang, and Naisatou Konteh. Furthermore, we wish to thank our research assistants from the University of Washington, Ratna Maya Magarati and Anthony Tessandori, for their tremendous help in data management and preliminary data analysis. We are indebted to Dr. Fuambai Ahmadu for her advice and logistical support in initiating data collection. And finally, we extend thanks to Dr. Saida Hodžić, Dr. Gerry Mackie, and Hon. Joel Ngugi for valuable comments on early drafts of this article.

References

Becker, Gary S. (1968) “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” 76 J. of Political Economy 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina (2005) The Grammar of Society: Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H., & Preves, Sharon E. (2000) “National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 703–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Huw T. O., Crombie, Ian K., & Tavakoli, Manouche (1998) “Information in Practice: When Can Odds Ratios Mislead?,” 316 British Medical J. 989–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diop, Nafissatou (2006) “Excision,” in Ndiaye, Salif, & Ayad, Mohamed, eds., Enquête Démographique et de Santé Sénégal 2005. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
Economist (1999) “Female Genital Cutting: Is It a Crime or Culture?,” February 13 Economist 45.Google Scholar
Eliah, Elaine (1996) “Reaching for a Healthier Future,” 23 Populi 12–16.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1991) Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (2007) Explaining Social Behaviour: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunning, Isabelle R. (1992) “Arrogant Perception, World-Traveling and Multicultural Feminism: The Case of Female Genital Surgeries,” 23 Columbia Human Rights Law Rev. 188–248.Google Scholar
Hecht, David (1999) “When a Law Sweeps in, Tradition Lashes Back,” Christian Science Monitor, February 4, 1999.Google Scholar
Katzive, Laura (2003) Using the law to promote women's rights. Considerations in drafting and implementing legislation to prevent FC/FGM. Paper presented at the Afro-Arab Expert Consultation on Legal Tools for the Prevention of Female Genital Mutilation, Cairo, Egypt, June 20–23, 2003.Google Scholar
Knodel, John (1993) “The Design and Analysis of Focus Group Studies: A Practical Approach,” in Morgan, D. L., ed., Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lewis, Hope, & Gunning, Isabelle R. (1998) “Cleaning Our Own House: ‘Exotic’ and Familial Human Rights Violations,” 123 Buffalo Human Rights Law Rev. 123–40.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry (2000) “Female Genital Cutting: The Beginning of the End,” in Shell-Duncan, B., & Hernlund, Y., eds., Female “Circumcision” in Africa: Culture, Controversy, and Change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry, & LeJeune, John (2009) “Social Dynamics of Abandonment of Harmful Practices: A New Look at the Theory,” Special Series on Social Norms and Harmful Practices: Innocenti Working Paper No. 2009-06, Florence, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. (1997) “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms,” 96 Michigan Law Rev. 338–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. (2000) “An Attitudinal Theory of Expressive Law,” 79 Oregon Law Rev. 339–90.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H., & Ulen, Thomas S. (2008) “Behavioral Criminal Law and Economics,” Olin Working Paper No. 440. Available at: http://www.law.u.chicago.edu/files/files/244-440.pdf (accessed 10 March 2013).Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miles, Matthew B., & Huberman, A. Michael (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun (2004) Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obiora, Leslye A. (1997) “Bridges and Barricades: Rethinking Polemics and Intransigence in the Campaign against Female Circumcision,” 47 Case Western Law Rev. 275–378.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. (2000) Law and Social Norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (2003) Economic Analysis of Law, 6th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Rahman, Anika, & Toubia, Nahid (2000) Female Genital Mutilation: A Guide to Law as and Policies Worldwide. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Shell-Duncan, Bettina (2008) “From Health to Human Rights: Female Genital Cutting and the Politics of Intervention,” 110 American Anthropologist 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell-Duncan, Bettina, & Hernlund, Ylva (2006) “Are There ‘Stages of Change’ in the Practice of Female Genital Cutting?: Qualitative Research Findings from Senegal and The Gambia,” 10 African J. of Reproductive Health 57–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shell-Duncan, Bettina, et al. (2010) “Contingency and Change in the Practice of Female Genital Cutting: Dynamics of Decision Making in Senegambia,” Summary Report. Available at: http://csde.washington.edu/bsd (accessed May 2013).Google Scholar
Shell-Duncan, Bettina, et al. (2011) “Dynamics of Change in the Practice of Female Genital Cutting in Senegambia: Testing Predictions of Social Convention Theory,” 73 Social Science and Medicine 1275–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, Anselm, & Corbin, Juliet (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Toomey, Leigh (2010) “A Delicate Balance: Building Complementary Customary and State Legal Systems,” 3 Law and Development Rev. 156–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tostan (1999) Breakthrough in Senegal: Ending Female Genital Cutting.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State (2004) Human Rights Reports, Available at: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/hr/c1470.htm (accessed September 2005).Google Scholar
UNFPA (n.d.) Senegal: Human Rights Key to Ending FGM/C. Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/gender/docs/fgmc_kit/LawSenegal.pdf (accessed 2 September 2012).Google Scholar
UNICEF (2005) Changing a Harmful Social Convention: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Florence, Italy: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF).Google Scholar
UNICEF (2010) Legislative Reform to Support the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. New York: UNICEF. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/policyanalysis/files/UNICEF_-_LRI_Legislative_Reform_to_support_the_Abandonment_of_FGMC_August_2010.pdf (accessed April 2011).Google Scholar
Welch, Claude E. Jr (1995) Protecting Human Rights in Africa: Roles and Strategies of Nongovernmental Organizations. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
WHO (1999) Female Genital Mutilation: Programmes to Date: What Works and What Doesn't. A Review. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Williams, Kirk R., & Hawkins, Richard (1986) “Perceptual Research on General Deterrence: A Critical Review,” 20 Law & Society Rev. 545–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar