Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T23:43:53.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limitations of the Efficacy of Surface Disinfection in the Healthcare Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Gareth J. Williams*
Affiliation:
Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
Stephen P. Denyer
Affiliation:
Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
Ian K. Hosein
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, North Middlesex University Hospital National Health Service Trust, London, England, UK
Dylan W. Hill
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control Department, Cardiff and Vale National Health Service Trust, Cardiff, Wales National Public Health Service Microbiology, Cardiff, Wales
Jean-Yves Maillard
Affiliation:
Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
*
Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3NB, Wales, UK(williamsgj3@cf.ac.uk)

Abstract

We examined the efficacy of 2 commercially available wipes to effectively remove, kill, and prevent the transfer of both methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated surfaces. Although wipes play a role in decreasing the number of pathogenic bacteria from contaminated surfaces, they can potentially transfer bacteria to other surfaces if they are reused.

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kramer, A, Schwebke, I, Kampf, G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sehulster, L, Chinn, RY; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52(RR-10):142.Google Scholar
3.Coia, JE, Duckworth, GJ, Edwards, DI, et al.Guidelines for the control and prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect 2006;63(Suppl 1):S1S44.Google Scholar
4.Werry, C, Lawrence, JM, Sanderson, PJ. Contamination of detergent cleaning solutions during hospital cleaning. J Hosp Infect 1988;11:4449.Google Scholar
5.Dharan, S, Mourouga, P, Copin, P, Bessemer, G, Tschanz, B, Pittet, D. Routine disinfection of patients' environmental surfaces, myth or reality? J Hosp Infect 1999;42:113117.Google Scholar
6.Barker, J, Vipond, IB, Bloomfield, SF. Effects of cleaning and disinfection in reducing the spread of norovirus contamination via environmental surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2004;58:4249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Williams, GJ, Denyer, SP, Hosein, IK, Hill, DW, Maillard, JY. The development of a new three-step protocol to determine the efficacy of disinfectant wipes on surfaces contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:329335.Google Scholar
8.Cheeseman, KE, Williams, GJ, Maillard, JY, Denyer, SP, Mahenthiralingam, E. Typing of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates using random amplification of polymorphic DNA method and comparison with antibiotic susceptibility typing. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:388390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Kampf, G, Jarosch, R, Rüden, H. Limited effectiveness of Chlorhexidine based hand disinfectants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Hosp Infect 1998;38:297303.Google Scholar
10.Block, C, Robenshtok, E, Simhon, A, Shapiro, M. Evaluation of Chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a surface test. J Hosp Infect 2000;46:147152.Google Scholar