Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T12:37:59.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physician Preferences for Educational Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Theresa L. Smith ,
Ronda L. Sinkowitz-Cochran  and
William R. Jarvis
Theresa L. Smith
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Ronda L. Sinkowitz-Cochran*
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
William R. Jarvis
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS E69, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Although educational media have expanded in variety, information on physicians' preferences for types of educational media remains limited.

Method:

An assessment form was distributed to 14 medical societies evaluating their members' medical education media preferences and society antimicrobial-resistance educational offerings.

Results:

These 14 medical societies represent 349,685 physicians. All supported educational offerings, most frequently as professional meetings, followed by audiotapes, computer programs, Internet sites, or print-based self-study materials. Only 5 (36%) societies had measured how many members used their educational offerings. Eight (57%) societies had made antimicrobial resistance an educational priority for their medical societies. Antimicrobial treatment was the most commonly offered educational topic on antimicrobial resistance.

Conclusions:

These 14 medical societies help to educate over one half the practicing US physicians. However, less than one half of the societies knew how many of their members used the educational materials they offered, or how their members would prefer to obtain medical education. Understanding how physicians want to obtain medical information potentially could improve the delivery of medical knowledge to physicians.

Type
Information Management
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 21 , Issue 9 , September 2000 , pp. 608 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Birchette, KP. The history of medical libraries from 2000 BC to 1900 AD. MLA 1973;61:302–308.Google Scholar
2. Goldberg, A. Towards European medicine: an historical perspective. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1989;23:277–286.Google Scholar
3. Ell, SR. Five hundred years of specialty certification and compulsory continuing medical education. Venice 1300-1801. JAMA 1984;251:752–753.Google Scholar
4. The Royal College of Physicians of London. Ann Intern Med 1968;68:704–706.Google Scholar
5. Davis, DA, Thomson, MA, Oxman, AD, Haynes, RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. JAMA 1992;268:1111–1117.Google Scholar
6. Davis, DA, Thomson, MA, Oxman, AD, Haynes, RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995;274:700–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Davis, D. Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med 1998;28:21–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Oxman, AD, Thomson, MA, Davis, DA, Haynes, RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995;153:1423–1431.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Bashook, PG, Parboosingh, J. Continuing medical education: recertification and the maintenance of competence. BMJ 1998;316:545–548.Google Scholar
10. Haynes, RB, Davis, DA, McKibbon, A, Tugwell, P. A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. JAMA 1984;251:61–64.Google Scholar
11. Gifford, DR, Mittman, BS, Fink, A, Lanto, AB, Lee, ML, Vickrey, BG. Can a specialty society educate its members to think differently about clinical decisions? Results of a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 1996;11:664–672.Google Scholar
12. Blumenfeld, A, Abraham, RB, Stein, M, Shapira, SC, Reiner, A, Reiser, B, et al. Cognitive knowledge decline after advanced trauma life support courses. J Trauma 1998;44:513–516.Google Scholar
13. Manning, PR, Denson, TA. How cardiologists learn about echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:469–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Buchanan, K, Laxdal, OE. Continuing education habits of Saskatchewan general practitioners. Can Med Assoc J 1971;105:1328–1333.Google Scholar
15. Vetto, JT, Richert-Boe, K, Desler, M, DuFrain, L, Hagen, H. Tumor board formats: ‘fascinating case’ versus ‘working conference.’ J Cancer Educ 1996;11:84–88.Google Scholar
16. Tinsley, JA, Shadid, GE, Li, H, Offord, KP, Agerter, DC. A survey of family physicians and psychiatrists. Psychotropic prescribing practices and educational needs. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1998;20:360–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Murray-Lyon, N. Communication in medicine: a study of how family doctors obtain information on recent advances in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Med Educ 1977;11:95–102.Google Scholar
18. Lefkarites, BJ, McGann, ME, Yeager, KK. Continuing education needs assessment: a brief report. Am J Prev Med 1995;11:45–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Curry, L, Putnam, RW. Continuing medical education in Maritime Canada: the methods physicians use, would prefer and find most effective. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124:563–566.Google Scholar
20. Berman, SJ, Perkocha, VA, Novotny, TE. A continuing education preference survey of public health graduates. Am J Prev Med 1995;11:19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Stinson, ER, Mueller, DA. Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs conducted through personal interviews. JAMA 1980;243:140–143.Google Scholar