Endoscopy 1998; 30(4): 345-350
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1001280
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Preliminary Results of a New Covered Biliary Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

C. S. Shim1 , Y. H. Lee1 , Y. D. Cho1 , H. K. Bong1 , J. O. Kim1 , J. Y. Cho1 , Y. S. Kim1 , J. S. Lee1 , M. S. Lee1 , S. G. Hwang1 , K. M. Shin2
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Institute for Digestive Research, College of Medicine, Soon Chun Hyang University, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Tae Woong Medical Inc, Seoul, Korea
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 March 2008 (online)

Abstract

Background and Study Aims: The biliary stents in current use have a tendency to be blocked, so we designed a self-expandable metal stent covered with polyurethane to overcome the risk of tumor ingrowth of uncovered self-expandable metal stents. To evaluate the success and the effectiveness of the new membrane-covered self-expandable metal stent (covered modified Gianturco biliary stent), we studied patients with biliary obstruction caused by biliopancreatic carcinoma.

Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 47 patients with malignant biliary obstruction to receive either a newly developed self-expandable metal stent covered with polyurethane (21 cases) or an uncovered metal stent (Strecker stent or Wallstent, 26 cases) by the endoscopic transpapillary route.

Results: The success rate of stent insertion and drainage effect of stent showed no statistical difference in patients with a new membrane-covered self-expandable metal stent compared with those with an uncovered metal stent (90.4 % vs. 88.5 %, P > 0.05; and 100 % vs. 95.6 %, P > 0.05, respectively). The median patency of the stent was slightly prolonged in patients with a membrane-covered self-expandable metal stent, but there was no statistical difference between two groups (267 vs. 233 days, P > 0.05). The rate of early complication related to stent insertion showed no significant difference between the two groups. During the follow-up period, stent occlusion due to tumor ingrowth occurred in two patients (10.5 %) in the membrane-covered, self-expandable stent group, compared with six patients (26.1 %) in the uncovered metal stent group. The membrane-covered metal stent was removed successfully and a polyethylene stent was reinserted in one patient who had developed tumor overgrowth.

Conclusions: A new, membrane-covered, self-expandable metal stent has a tendency towards better long-term patency than the uncovered metal stent, and it can effectively prevent tumor ingrowth into the stent. Also it is possible to remove an occluded membrane-covered stent. However, a case-controlled study, including a larger patient number, and long-term follow-up are needed.

    >