An Update on Embryo Culture for Human Assisted Reproductive Technology: Media, Performance, and Safety

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Several culture medium formulations are now available for the successful production and propagation of viable human embryos. In the most popular format, nutrients are provided in a temporal sequence that matches metabolic and amino acid composition with the requirements of specific developmental stage. An alternative philosophy, that all nutritional requirements for preimplantation embryogenesis can be met with a single medium formulation, is represented in commercially available formulations as well. Regardless of format employed, it is not widely appreciated in assisted reproductive technology laboratories that medium performance is strongly influenced by other components of the culture system, such as transitional conditions employed during the retrieval, pH, gas phase, and patient-specific characteristics. There is now further concern that in vitro culture, in general, modifies normal embryonic epigenetic processes and gene expression, genetic changes that may relate to specific ingredients of culture media.

REFERENCES

• 1 Gardner D K, Lane M. Culture systems for the human embryo. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. London, UK; Taylor & Francis 2004: 211-234
  Google Scholar
• 2 Pool T B. Recent advances in the production of viable human embryos in vitro.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;  4 294-302
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Summers M C, Biggers J D. Chemically defined media and the culture of mammalian preimplantation embryos: historical perspective and current issues.  Hum Reprod Update. 2003;  9(6) 557-582
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Pool T B. Blastocyst development in culture: the role of macromolecules. In: Gardner DK, Lane M ART and the Human Blastocyst. New York; Springer Verlag 2001 (in press)
  Google Scholar
• 5 Lane M, Gardner D K. Increase in postimplantation development of cultured mouse embryos by amino acids and induction of fetal retardation and exencephaly by ammonium ions.  J Reprod Fertil. 1994;  102 305-312
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Lane M, Gardner D K. Ammonium induces aberrant blastocyst differentiation, metabolism pH regulation, gene expression and subsequently altars fetal development in the mouse.  Biol Reprod. 2003;  69 1109-1117
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Sinawat S, Hsaio W, Flockhart J H, Kaufman M H, Keith J, West J D. Fetal abnormalities produced after preimplantation exposure of mouse embryos to ammonium chloride.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18(10) 2157-2165
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Wiemer K E, Anderson A R, Kyslinger M L, Weikert M L. Embryonic development and pregnancies following sequential culture in human tubal fluid and a modified simplex optimized medium containing amino acids.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;  5(3) 323-327
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Biggers J D, Racowsky C. The development of fertilized human ova to the blastocyst stage in KSOM^AA medium: is a two-step protocol necessary?.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;  5 133-140
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Biggers J D, McGinnis L K, Summers M C. Discrepancies between the effects of glutamine in cultures of preimplantation mouse embryos.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;  9(1) 70-73
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Biggers J D, McGinnis L K, Lawitts J A. Enhanced effect of glycl-L-glutamine on mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;  9(1) 59-69
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Gardner D K. Mammalian embryo culture in the absence of serum or somatic cell support.  Cell Biol Int. 1994;  18 1163-1179
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Gardner D K, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition of human IVF?.  Hum Reprod Update. 1997;  3 367-382
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Pool T B, Atiee S H, Martin J E. In: May JV Oocyte and embryo culture: Basic concepts and recent advances. In: Infertility and Reprod. Med. Clinics of North America, Assisted Reproduction: Laboratory considerations. Philadelphia, PA; WB Saunders 1998: 181-203
  Google Scholar
• 15 Gardner D K, Lane M. Embryo culture systems. In: Trounson A, Gardner DK Handbook of In Vitro Fertilization; Second Edition. Boca Raton; CRC Press 1999: 195-254
  Google Scholar
• 16 Pool T B, Martin J E. The production of viable human blastocysts: The evolution of sequential culture systems. In: Zelinsky-Wooten M, Wolf D Assisted Fertilization and Nuclear Transfer in Mammals. New York; Humana Press 2000
  Google Scholar
• 17 Gardner D K, Pool T B, Lane M. Embryo nutrition and energy metabolism and its relationship to embryo growth, differentiation and viability. In: Gardner DK, Rosenwaks Z Seminars in Reproductive Medicine: Novel Approaches to Assisted Reproduction: In Vitro Maturation of Gametes and Embryos. New York; Thieme 2001
  Google Scholar
• 18 Gardner D K, Reed L, Linck D, Sheehan C, Lane M. Quality control in human in vitro fertilization.  Semin Reprod Med. 2005;  23(4) 320-325
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Gardner D K, Lane M. Towards a single embryo transfer.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;  6(4) 470-481
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Pool T B, Ord V A. Oocyte treatment: from retrieval to insemination. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. London, UK; Taylor & Francis 2004: 107-113
  Google Scholar
• 21 Ortiz M E, Salvatierra A M, Lopez J, Fernandez E, Croxatto H B. Postovulatory aging of human ova. I. Light microscopic observations.  Gamete Res. 1982;  6 11-17
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Biggers J D, Whittingham D G, Donahue R P. The pattern of energy metabolism in the mouse oocytes and zygote.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1967;  58 560-567
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Donahue R P, Stern S. Follicular cell support of oocytes maturation: Production of pyruvate in vitro.  J Reprod Fertil. 1968;  17 395-398
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Leese H J, Barton A M. Production of pyruvate by isolated mouse cumulus cells.  J Exp Zool. 1985;  234 231-236
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Dulbecco R, Vogt M. Plaque formation and isolation of pure lines with poliomyelitis viruses.  J Exp Med. 1954;  199 167-182
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Good N E, Winget G D, Winter W, Connolly T N, Izawa S, Singh M M. Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research.  Biochemistry. 1966;  5 467-477
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Phillips K P, Leveille M C, Claman P, Baltz J. Intracellular pH regulation in human preimplantation embryos.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 896-904
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Pickering S J, Braude P R, Johnson M H, Cant A, Currie J. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte.  Fertil Steril. 1990;  54 102-108
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Wang W H, Keefe D L. Spindle observation in living mammalian oocytes with the polarizing microscope and its practical use.  Cloning Stem Cells. 2002;  4 269-276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Atiee S H, Pool T B, Martin J E. A simple approach to intracytoplasmic sperm injection.  Fertil Steril. 1995;  63 652-655
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Balmaceda J P, Heitman T O, Garcia M R, Pauerstein C J, Pool T B. Embryo cryopreservation in cynomolgus monkeys.  Fertil Steril. 1986;  45 403-406
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Martino A, Pollard J W, Leibo S P. Effect of chilling bovine oocytes on their developmental competence.  Mol Reprod Dev. 1996;  45 503-512
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Wu B, Tong J, Leibo S P. Effects of cooling germinal vesicle-stage bovine oocytes on meiotic spindle formation following in vitro maturation.  Mol Reprod Dev. 1999;  54 388-395
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Pollard J W, Leibo S P. Chilling sensitivity of mammalian embryos.  Theriogenology. 1994;  41 101-106
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Leibo S P, Martino A, Kobayashi S, Pollard J W. Stage-dependent sensitivity of oocytes and embryos to low temperatures.  Anim Reprod Sci. 1996;  42 45-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Lim J M, Reggio B C, Godke R A, Hansel W. Development of in-vitro-derived bovine embryos cultured in 5% CO2 in air or in 5% O2, 5% CO2 and 90% N2.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 458-464
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Behr B, Pool T B, Milki A A, Moore D, Gebhardt J, Dasig D. Preliminary clinical experience with human blastocyst development in vitro without co-culture.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 454-457
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Dumoulin J CM, Meijers C JJ, Bras M, Coonen E, Geraedts J PM, Evers J LH. Effects of oxygen concentration on human in-vitro fertilization and embryo culture.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 465-469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Gardner D K, Lane M, Johnson J, Wagley L, Stevens J, Schoolcraft W B. Reduced oxygen tension increases blastocyst development, differentiation and viability.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  72(suppl 1) S30-S31
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Meintjes M, Hill K, Johnston S, Waugh T, Rodriguez A, Madden J. The effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on implantation-pregnancy and cryopreservation rates in a predominantly day 5 embryo transfer program.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  74(suppl 1) P-511
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Karagenc L, Sertkaya Z, Ciray N, Ulug U, Bahceci M. Impact of oxygen concentration on embryonic development of mouse zygotes.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;  9(4) 409-417
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Burton G J, Hempstock J, Jauniaux E. Oxygen, early embryonic metabolism and free radical -mediated embryopathies.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;  6(1) 84-96
  Google Scholar
• 43 Harvey A J, Kind K L, Pantaleon M, Armstrong D T, Thompson J G. Oxygen-regulated gene expression in bovine blastocysts.  Biol Reprod. 2004;  71 1108-1119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 McConnell J, Petrie L. Mitochondrial DNA turnover occurs during preimplantation development and can be modulated by environmental factors.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;  9(4) 418-424
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Bean C J, Hassold T J, Judis L, Hunt P A. Fertilization in vitro increases non-disjunction during early cleavage divisions in a mouse model system.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17(9) 2362-2367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Dale B, Menezo Y, Cohen J, DiMatteo L, Wilding M. Intracellular pH regulation in the human oocyte.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 964-970
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Biggers J D, McGinnis L K, Raffin M. Amino acids and preimplatation development of the mouse I protein-free potassium simplex optimized medium.  Biol Reprod. 2000;  63 281-293
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Gardner D K, Lane M. Development of viable mammalian embryos in vitro: evolution of sequential media. In: Cibelli J, Lanza RP, Campbell KHS, West MD Principles of Cloning. New York; Academic Press 2002: 187-213
  Google Scholar
• 49 Macklon N S, Pieters M HEC, Hassan M A, Jeucken P HM, Eijkemans M JC, Fauser B CJM. A prospective randomized comparison of sequential versus monoculture systems for in-vitro human blastocyst development.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 2700-2705
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Barak Y, Goldman S, Gonen Y, Bartoov B, Kogosowski A. Does glucose affect fertilization, development and pregnancy rates of human in-vitro fertilized oocytes?.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13(suppl 4) 203-211
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Utsunomiya T, Naitou T, Nagaki M. A prospective trial of blastocyst culture and transfer.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 1846-1851
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Fleming T P, Kwong W Y, Porter R et al.. The embryo and its future.  Biol Reprod. 2004;  71 1046-1054
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Lonergan P, Pedersen H G, Rizos D et al.. Effect of post-fertilization culture environment on the incidence of chromosome aberrations in bovine blastocysts.  Biol Reprod. 2004;  71 1096-1100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Lonergan P, Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A, Fair T, Boland M P. Effect of culture environment on embryo quality and gene expression-experience from animal studies.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;  7(6) 657-663
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Lonergan P, Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A et al.. Temporal divergence in the pattern of messenger RNA expression in bovine embryos cultured from the zygote to blastocyst stage in vitro or in vivo.  Biol Reprod. 2003;  69 1424-1431
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Wrenzycki C, Niemann H. Epigenetic reprogramming in early embryonic development: effects of in-vitro production and somatic nuclear transfer.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;  7(6) 649-656
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Rizos D, Lonergan P, Boland M P et al.. Analysis of differential messenger RNA expression between bovine blastocysts produced in different culture systems: implications for blastocyst quality.  Biol Reprod. 2002;  66 589-595
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Doherty A S, Mann M RW, Tremblay K D, Bartolomei M S, Schultz R M. Differential effects of culture on imprinted H19 expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo.  Biol Reprod. 2000;  62 1526-1535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Khosla S, Dean W, Brown D, Reik W, Feil R. Culture of preimplantation mouse embryos affects fetal development and the expression of imprinted genes.  Biol Reprod. 2001;  64 918-926
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Ecker D J, Stein P, Xu Z et al.. Long-term effects of culture of preimplantation mouse embryos on behavior.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;  101(6) 1595-1600
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 De Rycke M, Liebaers I, Steirteghem A V. Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies risk analysis and epigenetic inheritance.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17(10) 2487-2494
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Thompson J G, Kind K L, Roberts C T, Robertson S A, Robinson J S. Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies short and long term consequences for the health of children conceived through assisted reproduction technology: more reason for caution?.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17(11) 2783-2786
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Geuns E, De Rycke M, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Methylation imprints of the imprint control region of the snrpn-gene in human gametes and preimplantation embryos.  Hum Mol Genet. 2003;  12(22) 2873-2879
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Lambert R D. Safety issues in assisted reproductive technology; aetiology of health problems in singleton ART babies.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18(10) 1987-1991
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Maher E R, Afnan M, Barratt C L. Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies: epigenetics, imprinting ART and icebergs?.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18(12) 2508-2511
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Lucifero D, Chaillet J R, Trasler J M. Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology.  Hum Reprod Update. 2004;  10(1) 3-18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Maher E R, Brueton L A, Bowdin S C. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (art).  J Med Genet. 2003;  40 62-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Edwards R G, Ludwig M. Are major defects in children conceived in vitro due to innate problems in patients or to induced genetic damage?.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;  7(2) 131-138
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Schieve L A, Rasmussen S A, Buck G M et al.. Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes?.  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology. 2004;  103(6) 1154-1163
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Bermudez M G, Wells D, Malter H et al.. Expression profiles of individual human oocytes using microarray technology.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;  8(3) 325-337
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Thomas B PoolPh.D. 

Scientific Director, Fertility Center of San Antonio, 4499 Medical Drive, Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78230

Email: rpool@fertilitysa.com