CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(07): E646-E651
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107781
Original article
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

Feasibility of transnasal endoscopy in screening for esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease

Anderson Antônio de Faria
Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Mimas Gerais, Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Carlos Alberto Freitas Dias
Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Mimas Gerais, Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Luciana Dias Moetzsohn
Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Mimas Gerais, Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Silas de Castro Carvalho
Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Mimas Gerais, Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Tereza Abreu Ferrari
Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Mimas Gerais, Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Vitor Nunes Arantes
Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Mimas Gerais, Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 23 October 2016

accepted after revision 24 March 2017

Publication Date:
06 July 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims Screening for esophageal and gastric varices is indicated for patients with portal hypertension or cirrhosis. Typically, conventional endoscopy is used; however, the need for sedation increases the costs and risks, especially in cirrhotic patients. Use of transnasal endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope enables study of the upper gastrointestinal tract without the need for sedation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of transnasal endoscopy in screening for esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease.

Patients and methods This was a prospective study in which transnasal endoscopy was carried out in patients with cirrhosis or portal hypertension who had indications for screening of esophageal and gastric varices. The following variables were evaluated: demographical data, duration of procedure, patient tolerance and acceptance, adverse events (AEs), endoscopic findings and interobserver agreement related to portal hypertension alterations (kappa index).

Results A total of 50 patients entered the study. The most common cause of liver disease was chronic viral hepatitis (66 %). Among the cirrhotic patients, most of the patients were Child-Pugh A (74 %). In 5 patients (10 %), nasal intubation was not possible. Two patients (4 %) experienced minor epistaxis. Tolerance was excellent or good in 92 % according with a visual analogic scale. In 16 patients (32 %), esophageal varices were detected and in 2 patients (4 %) gastric varices were detected. The mean duration of the procedure was 7 minutes.

Conclusions Transnasal endoscopy is feasible, effective and well tolerated for screening of esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease. It can be performed in outpatient clinics safely and without the use of sedation.

 
  • References

  • 1 Boyer TD. Natural history of portal hypertension. Clin Liver Dis 1997; 1: 31-44, x
  • 2 Bosch J, Pizcueta P, Feu F. et al. Pathophysiology of portal hypertension. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992; 21: 1-14
  • 3 Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. Varices and Variceal Hemorrhage in Cirrhosis: A New View of an Old Problem. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 2109-2117
  • 4 Okuda K. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension versus idiopathic portal hypertension. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17 (Suppl. 03) S204-S213
  • 5 Turon F, Casu S, Hernandez-Gea V. et al. Variceal and other portal hypertension related bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 649-664
  • 6 Sarin SK, Lamba GS, Kumar M. et al. Comparison of endoscopic ligation and propranolol for the primary prevention of variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 988-993
  • 7 D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Semin Liver Dis 1999; 19: 475-505
  • 8 Graham DY, Smith JL. The course of patients after variceal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology 1981; 80: 800-809
  • 9 de Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743-752
  • 10 Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Nikolakis D. et al. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 463-481
  • 11 Arantes V, Albuquerque W, Salles JM. et al. Effectiveness of unsedated transnasal endoscopy with white-light, flexible spectral imaging color enhancement, and lugol staining for esophageal cancer screening in high-risk patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 314-321
  • 12 Jobe BA, Hunter JG, Chang EY. et al. Office-based unsedated small-caliber endoscopy is equivalent to conventional sedated endoscopy in screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: a randomized and blinded comparison. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2693-2703
  • 13 Tanuma T, Morita Y, Doyama H. Current status of transnasal endoscopy worldwide using ultrathin videoscope for upper gastrointestinal tract. Dig Endosc 2016; 28 (Suppl. 01) 25-31
  • 14 Averbach M. Endoscopia Digestiva Diagnóstico e Tratamento. Livro da Sobed. Revinter RdJ, editor 2013
  • 15 Sarin SK, Kumar A. Gastric varices: profile, classification, and management. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84: 1244-1249
  • 16 Sackett DLHR, Guyat GH, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. ed. n, editor 1991
  • 17 Lee JY, Kim KM, Lee SG. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in potential living liver donors in Korea: a review of 589 consecutive liver biopsies in a single center. J Hepatol 2007; 47: 239-244
  • 18 Choe WH, Kim JH, Ko SY. et al. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 649-656
  • 19 Atar M, Kadayifci A. Transnasal endoscopy: Technical considerations, advantages and limitations. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 41-48
  • 20 Trevisani L, Cifala V, Sartori S. et al. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 906-911
  • 21 Stroppa I, Grasso E, Paoluzi OA. et al. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability. Dig Liver Dis 2008; 40: 767-775
  • 22 Murata A, Akahoshi K, Motomura Y. et al. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 965-968
  • 23 Alexandridis E, Inglis S, McAvoy NC. et al. Randomised clinical study: comparison of acceptability, patient tolerance, cardiac stress and endoscopic views in transnasal and transoral endoscopy under local anaesthetic. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40: 467-476
  • 24 Murata A, Akahoshi K, Sumida Y. et al. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 482-485
  • 25 Mori A, Ohashi N, Tatebe H. et al. Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures. J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 38-44
  • 26 Shaker R, Saeian K. Unsedated transnasal laryngo-esophagogastroduodenoscopy: an alternative to conventional endoscopy. Am J Med 2001; 111 Suppl 8A 153s-156s
  • 27 Craig A, Hanlon J, Dent J. et al. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 292-296
  • 28 Garcia RT, Cello JP, Nguyen MH. et al. Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1606-1612
  • 29 Aedo MR, Zavala-Gonzalez MA, Meixueiro-Daza A. et al. Accuracy of transnasal endoscopy with a disposable esophagoscope compared to conventional endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 128-136
  • 30 Saeian K, Staff D, Knox J. et al. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a new technique for accurately detecting and grading esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2246-2249
  • 31 Maffei M, Dumonceau JM. Transnasal esogastroduodenoscopy (EGD): comparison with conventional EGD and new applications. Swiss Med Wkly 2008; 138: 658-664
  • 32 Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T. et al. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: 141-146
  • 33 Colli A, Gana JC, Turner D. et al. Capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; Cd008760
  • 34 Chakrabarti R, Sen D, Khanna V. Is non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with compensated hepatic cirrhosis possible by duplex Doppler ultrasonography?. Indian J Gastroenterol 2016; 35: 60-66
  • 35 Shibata S, Joshita S, Umemura T. et al. Liver stiffness-spleen size-to-platelet ratio risk score detects esophageal varices in chronic liver disease. Springerplus 2016; 5: 998