New Trainer for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background: Only a few simulators are available which offer training in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). We have developed a VATS training model for surgeons. Methods: The simulator consists of a training module housing three disposable components: the lung (made of polyurethane), the bronchus, and the artificial circulatory pulmonary vessels (made of polyvinyl chloride), connected to a pump. VATS procedures were videotaped and evaluated using a checklist assessment method. Results: This unique module has been tested at several VATS seminars in Japan. In the questionnaire, training participants strongly agreed that the trainer was helpful and prepared them well for VATS lobectomy prior to performing actual surgery. Evaluation of the dexterity score for thoracoscopic surgery with our simulator correlated with the surgeons' experience with actual surgery. Technical factors were well taught using this model. Conclusions: Our unique trainer may enhance the skill of VATS surgeons at a national level.

References

• 1 Munz Y, Kumar D, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers. Is one superior to the other?.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 485-494
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Youngblood P L, Srivastava S, Heinrichs W L, Dev P, Wren S M. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance.  J Am Coll Surg. 2005;  200 546-551
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C, Nucca O, Maciocco M, Grignani F. Long-term survival after videothoracoscopic lobectomy for stage I lung cancer.  Chest. 2004;  126 725-732
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Iwasaki A, Shirakusa T, Shiraishi T, Yamamoto S. Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  26 158-164
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Park B J, Flores F M, Rusch V W. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;  131 19-20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ohtsuka T, Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suematsu K. Is major pulmonary resection by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate procedure in clinical stage I lung cancer?.  Chest. 2004;  125 1742-1746
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Daniels L J, Balderson S S, Mark P A‐C, Onaitis M W, D'Amoco T A. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: a safe and effective strategy for patients with stage I lung cancer.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 860-864
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Blum M G, Powers T W, Sundaresan S. Bronchoscopy simulator prepares junior residents to completely perform basic clinical bronchoscopy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  78 289-291
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Martin-Ucar A E, Chetty G K, Vaughan R, Waller D A. A prospective audit evaluating the role of video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy (VAM) as a training tool.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  26 393-395
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Shigemura N, Akashi A, Funaki S, Nakagiri T, Inoue M, Sawabata N, Shiono H, Minami M, Takeuchi Y, Okamura M, Sawa Y. Long-term outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage IA lung cancer: a multi-institutional study.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;  132 464-465
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Thomas P, Doddoli C, Yena S, Thirion X, Sebag F, Fuentes P, Giudicelli R. VATS is an adequate oncological operation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;  21 1094-1099
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Balduck B, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, Van Schil P. Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery: a prospective study in 100 patients.  Lung Cancer. 2007;  56 423-431
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Nagahiro I, Ando A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Sate H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 362-365
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Li W WL, Lee R LM, Lee T W, Ng C SH, Shioe A DL, Wan I YP, Arifi A AA, Yim A PC. The impact of thoracic surgical access on early shoulder function: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus posterolateral thoracotomy.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;  23 390-396
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Grantcharov T P, Kristiansen V B, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jansen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.  Br J Surg. 2004;  91 146-150
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Uchal M, Raftopoulos Y, Tjugum J, Bergamaschi R. Validation of six-task simulation model in minimally invasive surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 109-116
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist L E, Johansson H, Moran B J, Heald R J, Cedermark B. Impact of surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 225-229
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Ng T, Ryder B A. Evolution to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after training: initial results of the first 30 patients.  J Am Coll Surg. 2006;  203 551-557
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Reuthebuch O, Lang A, Groscurth P, Lachat M, Turina M, Zünd G. Advanced training model for beating heart coronary artery surgery: the Zurich heart-trainer.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;  22 244-248
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 McKenna R J, Houck W, Fuller C B. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1100 cases.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;  81 421-425
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Ferguson J, Walker W. Developing a VATS lobectomy programme - can VATS lobectomy be taught?.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;  29 806-809
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Akinori Iwasaki

Department of Thoracic Surgery
School of Medicine
Fukuoka University

Nanakuma, 45-1, 7-chome, Jonan-ku

Fukuoka 814-0180

Japan

Phone: + 81 9 28 01 10 11

Fax: + 81 9 28 61 82 71

Email: akinori@fukuoka-u.ac.jp