Risk Factors for Severe Perineal Tear: Can We Do Better?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Our aim was to investigate the risk factors associated with severe perineal tears defined as either third- or forth-degree tears and, ultimately, find strategies for prevention. We carried a retrospective analysis of a computerized perinatal database, collected prospectively, from a single county hospital between January 1, 1993 and June 30, 1998. Singleton vaginal vertex deliveries were analyzed for potential risk factors using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis including all two-way interactions. Severe perineal tear occurred in 1905 (8.2%) of 23,244 vaginal deliveries. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the following factors carried a significantly higher risk for severe laceration: midline episiotomy, primary vaginal delivery, use of pudendal block, forceps deliveries, and birth weight more than 4000 g. The study of interactions demonstrated that mediolateral episiotomy was associated with an increased risk for severe tear only during the first vaginal delivery, but not during a repeat vaginal delivery. Our data suggest that primary vaginal delivery, fetal weight above 4000 g, and the use of pudendal analgesia can help identify in advance patients at highest risk for severe perineal tear. During the delivery of these patients usage of vacuum (instead of forceps) and restricting the use of midline episiotomy might reduce the incidence of severe perineal tear. In cases where episiotomy seems crucial, the use of a mediolateral episiotomy may reduce the likelihood of severe perineal tear.

REFERENCES

• 1 Sultan A H, Kamm M A, Hudson C N, Bartram C I. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair.  BMJ . 1994;  308 887-891
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Gjessing H, Backe B, Sahlin Y. Third degree obstetric tears: outcome after primary repair.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 1998;  77 736-740
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Woolley R J. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980-part II.  Obstet Gynecol Surv . 1995;  50 821-835
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Peleg D, Kennedy C M, Merrill D, Zlatnik F J. Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration.  Obstet Gynecol . 1999;  93 1021-1024
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Woolley R J. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980-part I.  Obstet Gynecol Surv . 1995;  50 806-820
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Green J R, Soohoo S L. Factors associated with rectal injury in spontaneous deliveries.  Obstet Gynecol . 1989;  73 732-738
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Shiono P, Klebanoff M A, Carey J C. Midline episiotomies: more harm than good?.  Obstet Gynecol . 1990;  75 765-770
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Anzen B, Norman M, Holmstrom B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair.  Obstet Gynecol . 1999;  94 21-28
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Anthony S, Buitendijk S E, Zondervan K T, van Rijssel J E, Verkerk P H. Episiotomies and the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol . 1994;  101 1064-1067
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Walsh C J, Mooney E F, Upton G J, Motson R W. Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair.  Br J Surg . 1996;  83 218-221
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Poen A C, Felt-Bersma R J, Dekker G A, Deville W, Cuesta M A, Meuwissen S G. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol . 1997;  104 563-566
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Wood J, Amos L, Rieger N. Third degree anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome.  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol . 1998;  38 414-417
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Legino L J, Woods M P, Rayburn W F, McGoogan L S. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: 50 year's experience at a university hospital.  J Reprod Med . 1988;  33 423-426
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Combs C A, Robertson P A, Laros Jr K R. Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1990;  163 100-104
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Walker M P, Farine D, Rolbin S H, Ritchie J W. Epidural anesthesia, episiotomy, and obstetric laceration.  Obstet Gynecol . 1991;  77 668-671
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Helwig J T, Thorp Jr M J, Bowes Jr A W. Does midline episiotomy increase the risk of third- and fourth-degree lacerations in operative vaginal deliveries?.  Obstet Gynecol . 1993;  82 276-279
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M, Tremblay A, Pinault J J, Gingras S. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women.  Can Med Assoc J . 1997;  156 797-802
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Moller Bek K, Laurberg S. Intervention during labor: risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 1992;  71 520-524
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Poen A C, Felt-Bersma R J, Strijers R L, Dekker G A, Cuesta M A, Meuwissen S G. Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair.  Br J Surg . 1998;  85 1433-1438
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Carroli G, Belizan J, Stamp G. Episiotomy for vaginal birth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 1999 Oxford: Update Software; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 21 Williams F L, du V Florey C, Mires G J, Ogston S A. Episiotomy and perineal tears in low-risk UK primigravidae.  J Public Health Med . 1998;  20 422-427
  PubMedGoogle Scholar