The “Optimal” Burr Hole Position for Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy: Results from 31 Stereotactically Guided Procedures

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ETV is a well established and successful method in contemporary neurosurgery. With growing experience there is a more efficient patient selection and further advances in technical know how. We evaluated retrospectively a consecutive group of 27 patients who were treated in our institution by stereotactic guided ETV between 1992 and 1996. When reviewing their postoperative imaging studies (MRI/CT) we could measure the position of the burr hole as port of entry for the rigid endoscope in 17 out of 23 finally selected patients. The median lateral position was 28 mm (mean 26.5 mm) from the midline and 8 mm (mean 6.5 mm) anterior of the coronal suture. We conclude that the optimal burr hole position should be 3 cm lateral to the midline and 1 cm anterior of the coronal suture, in the patients with normal anatomical findings.

References

• 1 Barlow P, Ching H S. An economic argument in favor of endoscopic third ventriculostomy as a treatment for obstructive hydrocephalus.  Min Invasive Neurosurg. 1997;  40 37-39
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cohen A R. Ventriculoscopic surgery.  Clin Neurosurg. 1994;  41 562-564
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Dorward N L, Alberti O, Zhao J, Dijkstra A, Buurman J, Palmer J D, Hawkes D, Thomas D G. Interactive image-guided neuroendoscopy: development and early clinical experience.  Min Invasive Neurosurg. 1998;  41 31-34
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Goumnerova L C, Frim D M. Treatment of hydrocephalus with third ventriculocisternostomy: outcome and CSF flow patterns.  Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997;  27 149-152
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Grant J A, Mclone D G. Third ventriculostomy: a review.  Surg Neurol. 1997;  47 210-212
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Grunert P, Perneczky A, Resch K. Endoscopic procedures through the foramen interventriculare of Monro under stereotactical conditions.  Min Invasive Neurosurg. 1994;  37 2-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Hopf N J, Grunert P, Fries G, Resch K DM, Perneczky A. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: Outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures.  Neurosurg. 1999;  44 795-805
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Loh J K, Howng S L. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of non-communicating hydrocephalus.  J Formos Med Assoc. 1997;  96 839-842
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Rhotan R L, Luciano M G, Barnett G H. Computer-assisted endoscopy for neurosurgical procedures: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40 632-637
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Teo C, Jones R FC. Management of hydrocephalus by endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with myelomeningocele.  Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997;  25 57-63
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Teo C, Rahman S, Boop F A, Cherny B. Complications of endoscopic neurosurgery.  Childs Nerv Syst. 1996;  12 248-253
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Vinas F C, Dujovny N, Dujovny M. Microanatomical basis for the third ventriculostomy.  Min Invasive Neurosurg. 1996;  39 116-121
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Wilcock D J, Jaspan T, Worthington B S, Punt J. Neuro-endoscopic third ventriculostomy: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging.  Clin Radiol. 1997;  52 50-54
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Wong T T, Lee L S. A method of enlarging the opening of the third ventricular floor for flexible endoscopic third ventriculostomy.  Childs Nerv Syst. 1996;  12 396-398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Corresponding Author

Nikolai J Hopf, M. D., Ph. D 

Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Mainz

Langenbeckstr. 155131 Mainz

Phone: Phone:+ 49-6131-173734

Fax: Fax:+ 49-6131-172274

Email: E-mail:hopf@nc.klinik.uni-mainz.de