Quality Control in Coagulation Testing

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The term “quality control” in laboratory medicine refers to all the procedures commonly used in clinical laboratories to monitor the routine performance of testing processes, to detect possible errors, and to correct problems before test results are reported. In particular, internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment (EQA) programs are used to evaluate and improve quality in laboratory medicine. Laboratory testing is necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hemostatic disorders. However, whereas the benefits of quality control and quality assessment in hemostasis have been demonstrated many times and are well documented, available scientific evidence is significantly less than that in clinical chemistry and in other fields of laboratory medicine. Currently available data on analytical quality in coagulation testing not only demonstrates that quality is often unsatisfactory, but also highlights the need for more objective establishment of performances goals. This should be useful for better addressing both IQC and EQA programs. New challenges to EQA schemes for coagulation testing derive from the introduction of innovative tests, genetic analysis, and the need to assess not only analytical procedures but also all steps included in the total testing process.

REFERENCES

• 1 Plebani M, Carraro P. Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency.  Clin Chem. 1997;  43 1348-1351
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine.  Clin Chem. 2002;  48 691-698
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Astion M L, Shojana K G, Hamil T R, Kim S, Ng V L. Classifying laboratory incidents reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;  120 18-26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Howanitz P J. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;  129 1252-1261
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later.  Clin Chem. 2007;  53 1338-1342
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?.  Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;  44 750-759
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Westgard J O. Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies.  Ann Clin Biochem. 2003;  40 593-611
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Jennings I, Kitchen D P, Woods T AL, Kitchen S, Walker I D. Emerging technologies and quality assurance: the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme perspective.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;  33 243-249
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Lippi G, Franchini M, Montagnana M, Salvagno G L, Poli G, Guidi G C. Quality and reliability of routine coagulation testing: can we trust that sample?.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2006;  17 513-519
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lippi G, Guidi G C. Effect of specimen collection on routine coagulation assays and D-dimer measurement.  Clin Chem. 2004;  50 2150-2152
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Fraser C G, Kallner A, Kenny D, Petersen P H. Introduction: strategies to set global quality specifications in laboratory medicine.  Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;  59 477-478
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F et al.. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons, and progress.  Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;  59 491-500
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Fraser C G, Hyltoft Petersen P, Libeer J C. Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology.  Ann Clin Biochem. 1997;  34 8-12
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Meijer P, Haverkate F, Kluft C. Performance goals for the laboratory testing of antithrombin, protein C and protein S.  Thromb Haemost. 2006;  96 584-589
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Westgard J O, Westgard S A. The quality of laboratory testing today.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;  125 343-354
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Cunningham M T, Brandt J T, Chandler W L et al.. Quality assurance in hemostasis: the perspective from the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;  33 250-258
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Favaloro E J. Standardization, regulation, quality assurance and emerging technologies in hemostasis: issues, controversies, benefits and limitations.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;  33 290-297
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Tripodi A, Chantarangkul V. Performance of quantitative D-dimer methods: results of the Italian external quality assessment scheme.  J Thromb Haemost. 2007;  5 184-185
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Hertzberg M S, Mammen J, McCraw A, Nair S C, Srivastava A. Achieving and maintaining quality in the laboratory.  Haemophilia. 2006;  12 61-67
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Sunderji R, Gin K, Shalansky K et al.. Clinical impact of point-of-care vs laboratory measurement of anticoagulation.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;  123 184-188
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hertzberg M, Neville S, Favaloro E J, MacDonald D. External quality assurance of DNA testing for thrombophilia mutations.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;  123 189-193
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, Plebani M. External Quality Assessment Schemes: need for recognised requirements.  Clin Chim Acta. 2001;  309 183-199
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Sciacovelli L, Zardo L, Secchiero S, Plebani M. Quality specifications in EQA schemes: from theory to practice.  Clin Chim Acta. 2004;  346 87-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Mario PlebaniM.D. 

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova

Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy

Email: mario.plebani@unipd.it