Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T11:19:35.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of allosucking on growth of farmed red deer calves (Cervus elaphus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Get access

Abstract

It is generally presumed that allosucking brings benefits to the allosucking infants. Nevertheless, the data supporting such a presumption are rare. The aim of the study was to determine whether allosucking has any impact on growth rates of the allosucking calves. Fifty pregnant hinds were observed between 28 May (1st day of calving) and 2 September (abrupt weaning of all calves) on a red deer farm at Vimperk, South Bohemia, the Czech Republic. Of the 50 calves born the growth curve was calculated for 39 calves. During their 1st month of life these calves were observed in 1015 sucking bouts. In 690 cases the calves sucked from maternal hinds and in 325 cases non-maternal hinds. Only 25·64% of calves sucked exclusively from maternal hinds. The prevailing type of sucking behaviour was a combination of sucking from maternal hinds and allosucking (74·36%). Calves sucking from maternal and non-maternal hinds showed 1·6-fold higher sucking frequency than did calves feeding from maternal hinds only. Our results indicate that to some extend allonursing behaviour of the hind may affect their calves’ feeding behaviour. The more non-filial calves the maternal hind nursed, the higher frequency of the sucking by their calves occurred. The groups of calves did not differ in birth weight. With increasing age, the relative body weight increased faster in calves sucking maternal hinds only than in calves sucking maternal and non-maternal hinds. This gain in body weight was not essentially influenced by the fact whether or not the calf’s maternal hind nursed non-filial or exclusively filial calves. However, at weaning (99 days), the lowest body weight occurred in allosucking calves whose maternal hinds were allonursing. The results suggest that allosucking does not mean an extra profit to the allosucker. Instead, in our subjects, allosucking was rather attributed to compensation of nutritional requirements based on a combination of various factors, such as discrete differences in body weight at birth and also later and allonursing of the maternal hind.

Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartoš, L., Vaňkovà, D., Šiler, J. and Illmann, G. 2001. Adoption, allonursing, and allosucking in farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus). Animal Science 72: 483492.Google Scholar
Birgersson, B. and Ekvall, K. 1994. Suckling time and fawn growth in fallow deer (Dama dama). Journal of Zoology 232: 641650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birgersson, B., Ekvall, K. and Temrin, H. 1991. Allosuckling in fallow deer, Dama dama . Animal Behaviour 42: 326327.Google Scholar
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
Bubenik, A. B. 1965. Beitrag zur Geburtskunde und zu den Mutter-Kind-Beziehungen des Reh (Capreolus capreolus L.) und Rotwildes (Cervus elaphus L.). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 30: 65128.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. Z. 1998. Is suckling behaviour a useful predictor of milk intake? A review. Animal Behaviour 56: 521532.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H, Guinness, F. E. and Albon, S.D. 1982. Red deer, behavior and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ekvall, K. 1998. Effects of social organization, age and aggressive behaviour on allosuckling in wild fallow deer. Animal Behaviour 56: 695703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, M. W., Sigsgaard, J., Pemberton, J. M. and Tate, M. 1994. Hind-calf bonding during the neonatal period: evidence of mismatching in farmed red deer. Proceedings of the third international congress on the biology of deer, Edinburgh, p. 117 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Fraser, A. F. and Broom, D. M. 1990. Farm animal behaviour and welfare. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. and Barrette, C. 1985. Suckling and weaning in captive white-tailed and fallow deer. Behaviour 94: 128149.Google Scholar
Guinness, F. E., Hall, M. J. and Cockerill, R. A. 1979. Mother-offspring association in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on Rhum. Animal Behaviour 27: 536544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. D., Leakey, J. P. and Robertson, W. M. 1979. The effects of protein malnutrition on the behavior of rats during the suckling period. Developmental Psychobiology 12: 455466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illmann, G., Bartoš, L. and Šiler, J. 1997. Allosuckling and daytime nursing pattern in farmed red deer Cervus elaphus . Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 62: 124126.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. W. and Drew, K. R. 1976. Shelter seeking and sucking behaviour of the red deer calf (Cervus elaphus) in a farmed situation. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 101111.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. W. and Whateley, J. A. 1975. Observations on the calving of red deer (Cervus elaphus) run in confined areas. Applied Animal Ethology 1: 293300.Google Scholar
Langenau, E. E. and Lerg, J. M. 1976. The effects of winter nutritional stress on maternal and neonatal behavior in penned white-tailed deer. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 207223.Google Scholar
Lent, P. C. 1974. Mother-infant relationships in ungulates. In The Behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management (ed. Geist, V. and Walther, F.), IUCN publication new series 24, vol. 1, pp. 1455.Google Scholar
Mendl, M. and Paul, E. S. 1989. Observation of nursing and sucking behaviour as an indicator of milk transfer and parental investment. Animal Behaviour 37: 513515.Google Scholar
Moen, A. N. 1978. Seasonal changes in heart rate, activity, metabolism and forage intake of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 715738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphey, R. M., Paranhos da Costa, M. J. R., da Silva, R. G. and de Souza, R. C. 1995. Allonursing in river buffalo, Bubalus bubalis: nepotism, incompetence, or thievery? Animal Behaviour 49: 16111616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, C., Lewis, S. and Pusey, A. 1992. A comparative analysis of non-offspring nursing. Animal Behaviour 43: 265281.Google Scholar
Pélabon, C., Yoccoz, N. G., Ropertcoudert, Y., Caron, M. and Peirera, V. 1998. Suckling and allosuckling in captive fallow deer (Dama dama, Cervidae). Ethology 104: 7586.Google Scholar
Riedmann, M. L. 1982. The evolution of alloparental care and adoption in mammals and birds. Quarterly Review of Biology 57: 405435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadleir, R. M. F. S. 1980. Energy and protein intake in relation to growth of suckling black-tailed deer fawns. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58: 1347.Google Scholar