Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T10:08:20.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of a glass ionomer cement in otological surgery. A preliminary report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Gregorio Babighian*
Affiliation:
Venice, Italy
*
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Venice, Italy.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babighian, G. (1985) Bioactive ceramics versus Proplast implants in ossiculoplasty. American Journal of Otology, 6, 285290.Google ScholarPubMed
Geyer, G., Helms, H. (1990) Reconstructive measures in the middle ear and mastoid using a biocompatible cement. Preliminary clinical experience. Clinical implant materials: advances in biomaterials (Heimke, G., Soltesz, U., Lees, A. J. C, eds.), 9: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, p. 529535.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. (1991) Personal communication.Google Scholar
Grotte, J. J.(1990) Reconstruction of the middle ear with hydroxylapatite implants: long term results. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Supplement 144, 1216.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. G., Glasscock, M. E. IIIrd, Schwaber, M. K., Nissen, A. J., Christiansen, S. G., Smith, P. G. (1983) Ossicular chain reconstruction: the TORP and PORP in chronic ear disease. Laryngoscope, 93, 981988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonck, L. M.Grobbelaar, C. J., Strafing, H. (1989a) Biological evaluation of glass-ionomer cement (Ketac-0) as an interface material in total joint replacement. A screening test. Clinical Materials, 4, 201224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonck, L. M., Grobbelaar, C. J., Strating, H. (1989b) The Biocom patibility of glass-ionomer cement in joint replacement: bulk testing. Clinical Materials, 4, 85107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonck, L. M., Grobbelaar, C. J. (1990) IONOS bone cement (glassionomer): an experimental and clinical evaluation in joint replacement. Clinical Materials, 6, 323359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawahara, H., Imanishi, Y., Tomoka, K. (1977) Dental application of a glass ionomer cement. Dentistry Outlook, 50, 623633.Google Scholar
Mair, I. W., Pedersen, S., Laukli, E. (1989) Audiometric results of TORP and PORP in middle ear reconstruction. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 98, 429433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangham, C. A., Lindeman, R. C. (1990) Ceravital versus Plastipore in tympanoplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 99, 112116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, H., McDaniel, A. B., Lichtenstein, R. (1986) A comparison of PORP, TORP and incus homograft for ossicular reconstruction in chronic ear surgery. Laryngoscope, 96: 159165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeleny, M., Voldrich, Z., Pernikar, V. (1989) Late results in replacement of auditory ossicles with silastic prosthesis. Ceskoslovemska Otolaryngology, 38, 214219.Google Scholar
Zöllner, W. (1992) Scientific background of ionomeric cement in skull surgery. In Acoustic neuroma, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Acoustic Neuroma, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 25–29, 1991 (Tos, M., Thomsen, J. eds.). Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, New York, p. 721723.Google Scholar