Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T13:19:14.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The range of visual attraction and the effect of competitive visual attractants upon mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) flight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. L. Bidlingmayer
Affiliation:
Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, P.O. Box 520, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, USA
D. G. Hem
Affiliation:
Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, P.O. Box 520, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, USA

Abstract

Nocturnally active mosquitoes are attracted visually to large (1·5 × 2·4 m) unpainted plywood suction traps. Such traps, which discharge air horizontally in one direction only, were placed in an open field in Florida in various patterns to study the flight behaviour of mosquitoes. When four traps were placed 15 m apart in a column, the two end traps captured 83 or 53% more mosquitoes than the two inner traps, depending upon whether the air discharged from the traps was perpendicular to, or in line with, the trap column. When the traps were spaced 30 m apart, the end traps captured only 13% more than the inner traps, indicating that at this distance visual competition between traps was small. When 16 suction traps were spaced 15 m apart in a grid of four columns of four traps each, the traps at the four corners of the grid captured about 2·1 times, and traps between the corner traps along the edge of the grid 1·5 times, as many mosquitoes of most species as traps within the grid. Subsequently, four additional traps were placed 15 m beyond the corner traps, and these traps captured 3·3 times as many mosquitoes as traps inside the grid. Traps within the grid had four adjacent traps while traps at the edge, corner, and beyond the corner had three, two and one adjacent traps, respectively. The numbers captured by a trap at a particular location in the grid were inversely related to the number of adjacent traps, viz., suction-trap catches were decreased by about 33% as the number of adjacent traps were increased and thus each trap acted as a competing visual attractant on nearby traps. It was estimated that an isolated suction trap would capture approximately five times as many mosquitoes as a trap inside the grid. Assuming these differences between trap collections were caused by the distance at which mosquitoes respond to the traps and thus would be proportional to the visually unobstructed area about each trap, it was calculated that most adults responded visually to the traps from distances of approximately 15·5 to 19 m. Aedes vexans (Mg.) and Psorophora columbiae (D. & K.) were most responsive, followed by Culex nigripalpus Theo. and Culiseta melanura (Coq.) and then by Anopheles crucians Wied., P. ciliata (F.) and Uranotaenia lowii Theo. Only U. sapphirina (O.S.) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say appeared to possess visual ranges of 7.5 m or less. Visually conspicuous objects can serve as long-distance attractants. Low air velocities caused appreciable reductions in trap collections. At a distance of 15 m, the velocity of air discharged from the traps was only 0·6 m/s, but catches from a trap downstream of an adjacent trap were reduced by 17%. Catches from rows of traps downstream from one, two or three rows of traps were reduced by 15, 36, and 51%, respectively. Estimates of mosquito population densities in a natural environment will be affected by the differing visual attractiveness of objects of irregular distribution and sizes and their effect upon wind velocities.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1974). The influence of environmental factors and physiological stage on flight patterns of mosquitoes taken in the vehicle aspirator and truck, suction, bait and New Jersey light traps.—J. med. Ent. 11, 119146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1975). Mosquito flight paths in relation to the environment. Effect of vertical and horizontal visual barriers.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68, 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. & Hem, D. G. (1979). Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) flight behaviour near conspicuous objects.—Bull. ent. Res 69, 691700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edman, J. D. (1979). Orientation of some Florida mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) toward small vertebrates and carbon dioxide in the field.—J. med. Ent. 15, 292296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, M. T. & Wilkes, T. J. (1974). The range of attraction of birds as baits for some West African mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 573581.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1960). Studies on the biting habits and medical importance of East African mosquitoes in the genus Aëdes. I. Subgenera Aëdimorphus, Banksinella and Dunnius.—Bull. ent. Res. 50, 759779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, B. (1964). Aspects of insect vision.—Can. Ent. 96, 320334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead Thomson, R. C. (1940). Studies on the behaviour of Anopheles minimus. Part I. The selection of the breeding place and the influence of light and shade.—J. Malar. Inst. India. 3, 265294.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1974). Further results of catches of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and mosquitoes from suction traps.—J. med. Ent. 11, 471479.Google Scholar
Snow, W. F. (1975). The vertical distribution of flying mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) in West African savanna.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 269277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, W. F. (1977). The height and direction of flight of mosquitoes in West African savanna, in relation to wind speed and direction.—Bull. ent. Res. 67, 271279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar