Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T16:57:10.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Sensory Input–Based Adaptation and Brain Architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2009

Maurice Ptito
Affiliation:
Harlan Sanders Professor of Visual Science School of Optometry, University of Montreal, Canada
Sébastien Desgent
Affiliation:
Doctoral Candidate in Neurosciences Department of Physiology and School of Optometry, University of Montreal, Canada
Paul B. Baltes
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Frank Rösler
Affiliation:
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

It is well established that brain development depends on the interaction between the basic components of the nervous system (nature) and the environment (nurture). This interaction, however, relies on a number of rules that could modify not only the organization of neural systems, but also their function. In this chapter, we report results on the plasticity of the visual system in animal and human models, using a variety of methodological approaches. In particular, we describe major findings regarding plasticity that result from modifications of the visual input through lesions in the various stages of the visual pathway (peripheral and central). Possible mechanisms for such neural reorganization are also discussed.

NATURE VERSUS NURTURE: ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON BRAIN PLASTICITY

One of the oldest issues in modern psychology and biology concerns the nature versus nurture conundrum. Miscellaneous inquiries have been explored in this topic, such as “to what extent can genetic dispositions endow behaviors?” and “to what degree can the environment shape these?” It is well established that brain development depends on the interaction between the basic components of the nervous system (nature) and the stimulating environment (nurture). However, this interaction relies on a number of rules that could modify not only the organization of neural systems, but also their function. As we consider the main principles of evolution, we focus on the characteristics of the brain that are inheritable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Lifespan Development and the Brain
The Perspective of Biocultural Co-Constructivism
, pp. 111 - 133
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach-y-Rita, P., Kaczmarek, K. A., Tyler, M. E., & Garcia-Lara, J. (1998). Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: A technical note. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 35, 427–430Google ScholarPubMed
Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002). Cross-modal plasticity: Where and how?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, C., & Cynader, M. (1990). Effect of the richness of the environment on neurons in cat visual cortex: II. Spatial and temporal frequency characteristics. Developmental Brain Research, 53, 82–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berardi, N., Pizzorusso, T., & Maffei, L. (2000). Critical periods during sensory development. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 138–145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berardi, N., Pizzorusso, T., Ratto, G. M., & Maffei, L. (2003). Molecular basis of plasticity in the visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 26, 369–378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittar, R. G., Ptito, M., Faubert, J., Dumoulin, S. O., & Ptito, A. (1999). Activation of the remaining hemisphere following stimulation of the blind hemifield in hemispherectomized subjects. NeuroImage, 10, 339–346CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C., & Cooper, G. F. (1971). Modification of the visual cortex by experience. Brain Research, 31, 366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boire, D., Theoret, H., Herbin, M., Casanova, C., & Ptito, M. (2000). Retinogeniculate projections following early cerebral hemispherectomy in the vervet monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 373–381CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boire, D., Theoret, H., & Ptito, M. (2001). Visual pathways following cerebral hemispherectomy. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 379–397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronchti, G., Heil, P., Sadka, R., Hess, A., Scheich, H., & Wollberg, Z. (2002). Auditory activation of “visual” cortical areas in the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi). European Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chino, Y. M. (1999). The role of visual experience in the cortical topographic map reorganization following retinal lesions. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 15, 165–176Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L. G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Falz, L., Dambrosia, J., et al. (1997). Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature, 389, 180–183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coq, J. O., & Xerri, C. (1998). Environmental enrichment alters organizational features of the forepaw representation in the primary somatosensory cortex of adult rats. Experimental Brain Research, 121, 191–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowey, A. (2004). The 30th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Fact, artefact, and myth about blindsight. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 577–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volder, A. G., Bol, A., Blin, J., Arno, P., Grandin, C., Michel, C., & Veraart, C. (1997). Brain energy metabolism in early blind subjects: Neural activity in the visual cortex. Brain Research, 750, 235–244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Stefano, M., Ptito, M., Quessy, S., Lepore, F., & Guillemot, J. P. (1995). Receptive field properties of areas 17–18 neurons in strabismic cats with the early section of the optic chiasm. Journal für Hirnforschung, 36, 277–281Google ScholarPubMed
Dreher, B., Burke, W., & Calford, M. B. (2001). Cortical plasticity revealed by circumscribed retinal lesions or artificial scotomas. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 217–246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fendrich, R., Wessinger, C. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2001). Speculations on the neural basis of islands of blindsight. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 353–366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, D. O., Boire, D., Gingras, G., & Ptito, M. (2000). Surgically created neural pathways mediate visual pattern discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 97, 11068–11073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbin, M., Boire, D., Theoret, H., & Ptito, M. (1999). Transneuronal degeneration of retinal ganglion cells in early hemispherectomized monkeys. Neuroreport, 10, 1447–1452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izraeli, R., Koay, G., Lamish, M., Heicklen-Klein, A. J., Heffner, H. E., Heffner, R. S., & Wollberg, Z. (2002). Cross-modal neuroplasticity in neonatally enucleated hamsters: Structure, electrophysiology and behaviour. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 693–712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, B. B., & Belichenko, P. V. (2002). Neuronal plasticity and dendritic spines: Effect of environmental enrichment on intact and postischemic rat brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 22, 89–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2001). An introduction to brain and behavior.New York: Worth PublishersGoogle Scholar
Krubitzer, L., & Kahn, D. M. (2003). Nature versus nurture revisited: An old idea with a new twist. Progress in Neurobiology, 70, 33–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kujala, T., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (2000). Cross-modal reorganization of human cortical functions. Trends in Neuroscience, 23, 115–120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kupers, R., & Ptito, M. (2004). “Seeing” through the tongue: Cross-modal plasticity in the congenitally blind. International Congress Series, 1270, 79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyckman, A. W., & Sur, M. (2002). Role of afferent activity in the development of cortical specification. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, 39, 139–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllister, A. K., Katz, L. C., & Lo, D. C. (1999). Neurotrophins and synaptic plasticity. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 295–318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchner, L., Pallas, S. L., & Sur, M. (2000). Visual behaviour mediated by retinal projections directed to the auditory pathway. Nature, 404, 871–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olausson, H., Ha, B., Duncan, G. H., Morin, C., Ptito, A., Ptito, M., Marchand, S., & Bushnell, M. C. (2001). Cortical activation by tactile and painful stimuli in hemispherectomized patients. Brain, 124, 916–927CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascual-Leone, A., & Torres, F. (1993). Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. Brain, 116, 39–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. R., & Lomber, S. G. (2002). Plasticity of the visual cortex after injury: What's different about the young brain?Neuroscientist, 8, 174–185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ptito, A., Fortin, A., & Ptito, M. (2001). “Seeing” in the blind hemifield following hemispherectomy. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 367–378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ptito, M., Bouchard, P., Lepore, F., Quessy, S., Di Stefano, M., & Guillemot, J. P. (1995). Binocular interactions and visual acuity loss in esotropic cats. Canadian Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology, 73, 1398–1405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ptito, M., Dalby, M., & Gjedde, A. (1999). Visual field recovery in a patient with bilateral occipital lobe damage. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 99, 252–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ptito, M., Giguere, J. F., Boire, D., Frost, D. O., & Casanova, C. (2001). When the auditory cortex turns visual. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 447–458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ptito, M., Johanssen, P., Faubert, J., & Gjedde, A. (1999). Activation of human extrageniculostriate pathways after damage to area V1. NeuroImage, 9 (1), 97–107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rampon, C., & Tsien, J. Z. (2000). Genetic analysis of learning behavior-induced structural plasticity. Hippocampus, 10, 605–6093.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauschecker, J. P. (1995). Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 18, 36–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebillard, G., Carlier, E., Rebillard, M., & Pujol, R. (1977). Enhancement of visual responses on the primary auditory cortex of the cat after an early destruction of cochlear receptors. Brain Research, 129, 162–164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Röder, B., & Rösler, F. (2003). The principle of brain plasticity. In R. H. Kluwe, G. Lüer, & F. Rösler (Eds.), Principles of learning and memory (pp. 27–50). Basel, Switzerland: BirkhäuserGoogle Scholar
Röder, B., Stock, O., Bien, S., Neville., H. J., & Rösler, F. (2002). Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind adults. European Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 930–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Deiber, M. P., Ibanez, V., & Hallett, M. (1998). Neural networks for Braille reading by the blind. Brain, 121, 1213–1229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sengpiel, F., & Kind, P. C. (2002). The role of activity in development of the visual system. Current Biology, 12, 818–826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toldi, J., Farkas, T., & Volgyi, B. (1994). Neonatal enucleation induces cross-modal changes in the barrel cortex of rat: A behavioural and electrophysiological study. Neuroscience Letters, 167, 1–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toldi, J., Feher, O., & Wolff, J. R. (1996). Neuronal plasticity induced by neonatal monocular (and binocular) enucleation. Progress in Neurobiology, 48, 191–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomaiuolo, F., Ptito, M., Marzi, C. A., Paus, T., & Ptito, A. (1997). Blindsight in hemispherectomized patients as revealed by spatial summation across the vertical meridian. Brain, 120, 795–803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1965). Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 1029–1040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiskrantz, L. (2004). Roots of blindsight. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 229–241Google ScholarPubMed
Weiskrantz, L., Warrington, E. K., Sanders, M. D., & Marshall, J. (1974). Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain, 97, 709–728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. (1991). Cerebral akinetopsia (visual motion blindness): A review. Brain, 114, 811–824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×