Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T09:19:05.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in care for infants undergoing the Stage II palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

Aaron Eckhauser*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Section of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Sara K. Pasquali
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Chitra Ravishankar
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Linda M. Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Section of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Jane W. Newburger
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Andrew M. Atz
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
Nancy Ghanayem
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
Steven M. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Paediatrics, Divisions of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine and Cardiology, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, CA, USA
Chong Zhang
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Jeffery P. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, John’s Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL, USA
L. LuAnn Minich
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Section of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
*
Author for correspondence: A. Eckhauser, MD, MS, Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, 100 N. Mario Capecchi Dr, Suite 2200, Salt Lake City, UT 84113, USA. Tel: 801 662 5566; Fax: 801 662 5571; E-mail: aaron.eckhauser@hsc.utah.edu

Abstract

Background

The Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial randomised neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome to a systemic-to-pulmonary-artery shunt strategy. Patients received care according to usual institutional practice. We analysed practice variation at the Stage II surgery to attempt to identify areas for decreased variation and process control improvement.

Methods

Prospectively collected data were available in the Single Ventricle Reconstruction public-use database. Practice variation across 14 centres was described for 397 patients who underwent Stage II surgery. Data are centre-level specific and reported as interquartile ranges across all centres, unless otherwise specified.

Results

Preoperative Stage II median age and weight across centres were 5.4 months (interquartile range 4.9–5.7) and 5.7 kg (5.5–6.1), with 70% performed electively. Most patients had pre-Stage-II cardiac catheterisation (98.5–100%). Digoxin was used by 11/14 centres in 25% of patients (23–31%), and 81% had some oral feeds (68–84%). The majority of the centres (86%) performed a bidirectional Glenn versus hemi-Fontan. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 96 minutes (75–113). In aggregate, 26% of patients had deep hypothermic circulatory arrest >10 minutes. In 13/14 centres using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, 12.5% of patients exceeded 10 minutes (8–32%). Seven centres extubated 5% of patients (2–40) in the operating room. Postoperatively, ICU length of stay was 4.8 days (4.0–5.3) and total length of stay was 7.5 days (6–10).

Conclusions

In the Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial, practice varied widely among centres for nearly all perioperative factors surrounding Stage II. Further analysis may facilitate establishing best practices by identifying the impact of practice variation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. America CoQoHCi. Crossing the Quality Chasm/A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC.: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
2. James, B. Quality improvement opportunities in health care making it easy to do it right. J Manag Care Pharm 2002; 8: 394399.Google Scholar
3. James, BC, Hammond, ME. The challenge of variation in medical practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 10011003.Google Scholar
4. Burstein, DS, Rossi, AF, Jacobs, JP, et al. Variation in models of care delivery for children undergoing congenital heart surgery in the United States. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2010; 1: 814.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, JN, Jaggers, J, Li, S, et al. Center variation and outcomes associated with delayed sternal closure after stage 1 palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 12051210.Google Scholar
6. Wallace, MC, Jaggers, J, Li, JS, et al. Center variation in patient age and weight at Fontan operation and impact on postoperative outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 14451452.Google Scholar
7. Ohye, RG, Sleeper, LA, Mahony, L, et al. Comparison of shunt types in the Norwood procedure for single-ventricle lesions. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 19801992.Google Scholar
8. Pasquali, SK, Ohye, RG, Lu, M, et al. Variation in perioperative care across centers for infants undergoing the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 915921.Google Scholar
9. Anderson, JB, Beekman, RH, Kugler, JD, et al. Improvement in interstage survival in a national pediatric cardiology learning network. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015; 8: 428436.Google Scholar
10. Anderson, JB, Beekman, RH, Kugler, JD, et al. Use of a learning network to improve variation in interstage weight gain after the Norwood operation. Congenit Heart Dis 2014; 9: 512520.Google Scholar
11. Mahle, WT, Nicolson, SC, Hollenbeck-Pringle, D, et al. Utilizing a collaborative learning model to promote early extubation following infant heart surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2016; 17: 939947.Google Scholar
12. Vener, DF, Gaies, M, Jacobs, JP, Pasquali, SK. Clinical databases and registries in congenital and pediatric cardiac surgery, cardiology, critical care, and anesthesiology worldwide. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2017; 8: 7787.Google Scholar
13. Lambert, LM, Pike, NA, Medoff-Cooper, B, et al. Variation in feeding practices following the Norwood procedure. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 23742 e1.Google Scholar
14. Brown, DW, Mangeot, C, Anderson, JB, et al. Digoxin use is associated with reduced interstage mortality in patients with no history of arrhythmia after stage I palliation for single ventricle heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e002376.Google Scholar
15. Oster, ME, Kelleman, M, McCracken, C, Ohye, RG, Mahle, WT. Association of digoxin with interstage mortality: results from the pediatric heart network single ventricle reconstruction trial public use dataset. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e002566.Google Scholar
16. Cnota, JF, Allen, KR, Colan, S, et al. Superior cavopulmonary anastomosis timing and outcomes in infants with single ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 12881296.Google Scholar