Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T17:31:11.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some cultural characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus strains from superficial skin infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. T. Parker
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Manchester
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A collection of 1389 strains of Staphylococcus aureus of human origin was examined by the following tests: phage typing, antibiotic resistance, ability to inhibit the growth of Corynebacterium diphtheriae, the egg-yolk reaction and the serum opacity reaction.

2. Nearly all strains of Staph. aureus Type 71 were penicillin resistant, inhibited C. diphtheriae, gave a negative egg-yolk reaction, and produced a zone of opacity on horse-serum agar.

3. The penicillin resistance of Type 71 strains is unlikely to have arisen as a result of the therapeutic use of penicillin, and is probably a natural characteristic of the type.

4. Staph. aureus strains which gave a negative egg-yolk reaction and a positive serum opacity reaction occurred almost exclusively in superficial lesions. The majority of them were members of Type 71, or were penicillin-resistant members of phage-group III. It is suggested that these organisms can cause superficial inflammation, but are usually unable to invade deeper tissues.

I wish to thank Dr A. J. H. Tomlinson for valuable information about his unpublished work on impetigo. Thanks are also due to many colleagues who have provided cultures and clinical information, to Dr R. E. O. Williams for typing phages, and to Mr L. E. Simmons for technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

References

Alder, V. G., Gillespie, W. A. & Herdan, G. (1953). Production of opacity in egg yolk broth by staphylococci from various sources. J. Path. Bact. 66, 205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alder, V. G., Gillespie, W. A. & Thompson, M. E. M. (1955). Virulence and phage patterns of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci in a hospital. J. Path. Bact. 70, 503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, V. D. (1949). In discussion on food-poisoning. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 42, 216.Google Scholar
Almquist, E. (1891). Pemphigus neonatorum, bakteriologisch und epidemiologisch beleuchtet. Z. Hyg. InfektKr. 10, 253.Google Scholar
Barber, M. & Burston, J. (1955). Antibiotic-resistant staphylococcal infection: a study of antibiotic sensitivity in relation to bacteriophage types. Lancet, ii, 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, R. & North, E. A. (1941). Observations on staphylococcal beta toxin and its production by strains isolated from staphylococcal lesions in man. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 19, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, R. & Wilson, H. (1941). A test for staphylococcal fibrinolysis. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 19, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, M. T. & Wherry, W. B. (1906). The etiology of pemphigus contagiosus in the tropics. J. infect. Dis. 3, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohi, , & Kurita, , (1904). Jap. Z. Derm. 4, 3. Quoted by Dohi K. & Dohi S. (1912). Zur Klinik und Atiologie der Impetigo contagiosa. Arch. Derm. Syph., Wien, 111, 629.Google Scholar
Elek, S. D. & Levy, E. (1950). Diffusible antigens in staphylococcal cultures. Brit. J. exp. Path. 31, 358.Google ScholarPubMed
Epstein, S. (1934). Untersuchungen über die Unterschiedung der Staphylokokken bei den verschiedenen Staphylokokkenerkrankungen der Haut. Arch. Derm. Syph., Wien, 170, 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (1935). Beitrag zur staphylogenen Impetigo contagiosa. Derm. Zbl. 70, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, R. W. & Martyn, G. (1951). The disc technique for determining sensitivity to the antibiotics. J. clin. Path. 4, 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, W. A. & Alder, V. G. (1952). Production of opacity in egg-yolk media by coagulase-positive staphylococci. J. Path. Bact. 64, 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isbister, C., Durie, E. B., Rountree, P. M. & Freeman, B. M. (1954). A further study of staphylococcal infection of the new-born. Med. J. Aust. ii, 897.Google Scholar
Klinge, K. (1957). Die Eigelbreaktion und die Wirkung von Mikroorganismen auf den Eigelb-Komplex. Arch. Hyg., Berl., 141, 334.Google Scholar
Parker, M. T. & Lapage, S. P. (1957). Penicillinase production by Staphylococcus aureus strains from outbreaks of food poisoning. J. clin. Path. 10, 313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. T., Tomlinson, A. J. H. & Williams, R. E. O. (1955). Impetigo contagiosa. The association of certain types of Staphylococcus aureus and of Streptococcus pyogenes in superficial skin infections. J. Hyg., Camb., 53, 458.Google ScholarPubMed
Reid, D. J. & Jackson, R. M. (1945). An improved method for determining the coagulase activity of staphylococci by means of the plasma agar plate. J. Lab. clin. Med. 30, 155.Google Scholar
Rippon, J. E. (1956). The classification of bacteriophages lysing staphylococci. J. Hyg., Camb., 54, 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rountree, P. M. & Freeman, B. M. (1955). Infections caused by a particular phage type of Staphylococcus aureus. Med. J. Aust. ii, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rountree, P. M. & Rheuben, J. (1956). Penicillin-resistant staphylococci in the general population. Med. J. Aust. i, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rountree, P. M. & Thompson, E. F. (1952). Incidence of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci in a hospital. Lancet, ii, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, A. J. H. & Parker, M. T. (1956). Production of opacity on serum agar plates by some strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Nature, Lond., 177, 895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unna, P. G. & Schwenter-Traschler, J. (1899). Impetigo vulgaris. Mh. prakt. Derm. 28, 229.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O. & Rippon, J. E. (1952). Bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. E. O., Rippon, J. E. & Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Bacteriophage typing of strains of Staphylococcus aureus from various sources. Lancet, i, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. & Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Typing of staphylococci by the bacteriophage method. Lancet, i, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. D. (1933). The importance of adequate reduction of peptone in the preparation of media for the pneumococcus and other organisms. J. Path. Bact. 37, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar