Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T12:00:26.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Paths of Effects of Preschool Participation to Educational Attainment at Age 21: A Three-Study Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Arthur J. Reynolds ,
Michelle M. Englund ,
Suh-Ruu Ou ,
Lawrence J. Schweinhart  and
Frances A. Campbell
Edited by
Arthur J. Reynolds ,
Arthur J. Rolnick ,
Michelle M. Englund  and
Judy A. Temple
Arthur J. Reynolds
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Arthur J. Rolnick
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Michelle M. Englund
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Judy A. Temple
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A hallmark of preschool programs is their capacity to promote lasting effects on child well-being into adulthood. Long-term beneficial effects of early childhood programs have been documented for school performance and achievement, antisocial and criminal behavior, educational attainment, economic well-being, parenting behaviors, health status and behavior, and mental health (Campbell & Ramey, 1995; Karoly, 2001; Karoly, Cannon, & Kilburn, 2005; McLaughlin, Campbell, Pungello, & Skinner, 2007; Reynolds et al., 2007; Schweinhart, Barnes, & Weikart, 1993; Temple & Reynolds, 2007).

The most consistently observed and consequential long-term effects of preschool programs are for educational attainment. Measured by high school completion, years of education, or college attendance, higher educational attainment has been demonstrated in model (Campbell, Ramey, Pungello, Sparling, & Miller-Johnson, 2002; Consortium for Longitudinal Studies, 1983; Schweinhart et al., 1993, 2005) and large-scale programs (Currie & Thomas, 2000; Garces, Thomas, & Currie, 2002; Oden, Schweinhart, Weikart, Marcus, & Xie, 2000; Reynolds, Temple, Robertson, & Mann, 2001). Educational attainment is a key determinant of economic well-being and is a fundamental measure for estimating economic returns in cost-benefit analysis. Although long-term positive effects of preschool have been found for other adult outcomes such as employment and income (Schweinhart et al., 1993), crime prevention (Reynolds et al., 2001; Schweinhart et al., 1993), health status and behavior, and mental health (McLaughlin et al., 2007; Reynolds et al., 2007), they have been demonstrated less consistently.

Type
Chapter
Information
Childhood Programs and Practices in the First Decade of Life
A Human Capital Integration
 , pp. 415 - 452
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, W. S., Hustedt, J. T., Friedman, A. H., Stevenson Boyd, J., & Ainsworth, P. (2008). The state of preschool 2007: State preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute of Early Education Research.Google Scholar
Berrueta-Clement, J., Schweinhart, L., Barnett, W. S., Epstein, A., & Weikart, D. (1984). Changed lives: The effects of the Perry Preschool Program on youths through age 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (1984). HOME observation for measurement of the environment (rev. ed.). Little Rock: Center for Child Development and Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37(2),231–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1995). Cognitive and school outcomes for high-risk African American students at middle adolescence: Positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 743–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Chicago Longitudinal Study. (1999). Chicago Longitudinal Study: User's guide (Vol. 6). Madison: Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Comer, J. P., Ben-Avie, M., Haynes, N. M., & Joyner, E. T. (Eds.). (1999). Child by child: The Comer process for change in education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
,Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. (1983). As the twig is bent…lasting effects of preschool programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (2000). School quality and the longer-term effects of Head Start. Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 755–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 145–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garces, E., Thomas, D., & Currie, J. (2002). Longer term effects of Head Start. American Economic Review, 92(4), 999–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. (2000). Policies to foster human capital. Research in Economics, 54, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymus, A. N., Lindquist, E. F., & Hoover, H. D. (1982). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills: Manual for school administrators. Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996a). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS 2: User's reference guide(3rd ed.). Chicago: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Karoly, L. A. (2001). Reducing poverty through human capital investments. In Danziger, S. H. & Haveman, R. H. (Eds.), Understanding poverty (314–356). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Karoly, L. A., Cannon, J. S., & Kilburn, M. R. (2005). Early childhood interventions: Proven results, future promise. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. B. (2003). Economic considerations and class size. Economic Journal, 113, F34–F63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, A. E., Campbell, F. C., Pungello, E. P., & Skinner, M. (2007). Depressive symptoms in young adults: The influences of the early home environment and early educational childcare. Child Development, 78, 746–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oden, S., Schweinhart, L., Weikart, D., Marcus, S., & Xie, Y. (2000). Into adulthood: A study of the effects of Head Start. Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope.Google Scholar
Ou, S. (2003). The effects of an early childhood intervention on educational attainment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Ou, S., & Reynolds, A. J. (2004). Preschool education and school completion. In Tremblay, R. E., Barr, R. G., & Peters, R. D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia on early childhood development (pp. 1–10). Montreal: Centre for Excellence in Early Childhood Development. Retrieved from http://www.child-encyclopedia.com.Google Scholar
Ramey, C. T., Campbell, F. A., & Blair, C. (1998). Enhancing the life course for high-risk children: Results from the Abecedarian Project. In Crane, J. (Ed.), Social programs that work (pp. 163–183). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Ramey, C. T., Campbell, F. A., Burchinal, M., Skinner, M. L., Gardner, D. M., & Ramey, S. L. (2000). Persistent effects of early intervention on high-risk children and their mothers. Applied Developmental Science, 1, 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (1998). Confirmatory program evaluation: A method for strengthening causal inference. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (2005). Confirmatory program evaluation: Applications to early childhood intervention. Teachers College Record, 107, 2401–2425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Mavrogenes, N. A., Bezruczko, N., & Hagemann, M. (1996). Cognitive and family-support mediators of preschool effectiveness: A confirmatory analysis. Child Development, 67, 1119–1140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., Ou, S., & Topitzes, J. (2004). Paths of effects of early childhood intervention on educational attainment and juvenile arrest: A confirmatory analysis of the Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Child Development, 75, 1299–1328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., & Temple, J. A. (1998). Extended early childhood intervention and school achievement: Age 13 findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 69, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., & Temple, J. A. (2008). Cost-effective early childhood development programs from preschool to third grade. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 109–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Ou, S., Robertson, D. L., Mersky, J. P., Topitzes, J. W.. (2007). Effects of a school-based, early childhood intervention on adult health and well-being: A 19-year follow-up of low-income families. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 161, 730–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of American Medical Association, 285(18), 2339–2346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2002). Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 267–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2003). Early childhood programs for a new century. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, E. S., Edgerton, M., & Aaronson, M. (1978). Classroom Behavior Inventory, revised. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: The HighScope Perry Preschool Study through age 40. Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Press.Google Scholar
Temple, J. A., & Reynolds, A. J. (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child-Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1960). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Form L-M: Manual for the third revision. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Tiegs, E. W., & Clark, W. W. (1963). California Achievement Tests: Complete battery (1957 ed.). Monterey Park, CA: California Test Bureau/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tiegs, E. W., & Clark, W. W. (1971). California Achievement Tests (1970 ed.). Monterey Park, CA: California Test Bureau/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vinter, R. D., Sarri, R. C., Vorwaller, D. J., & Schafer, W. E. (1966). Pupil Behavior Inventory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1967). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery – Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (1993). Head Start and beyond: A national plan for extended childhood intervention. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zigler, E., Taussig, C., & Black, K. (1992). Early childhood intervention: A promising preventive for juvenile delinquency. American Psychologist, 47, 997–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×