Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

17-02-2023 | Laparoscopy | Original Article

Robotic liver resection in the posterosuperior segments as a way to extent the mini-invasive arsenal: a comparison with transthoracic laparoscopic approach

Authors: Pauline Denglos, Stéphanie Truant, Mehdi El Amrani, Guillaume Millet

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The field of robotic liver resection (RLR) has developed in the past decades. This technique seems to improve the access to the posterosuperior (PS) segments. Evidence of a possible advantage over transthoracic laparoscopy (TTL) is not yet available. We aimed to compare RLR to TTL for tumors located in the PS segments of the liver in terms of feasibility, difficulty scoring, and outcome.

Methods

This retrospective study compared patients undergoing robotic liver resections and transthoracic laparoscopic resections of the PS segments between January 2016 and December 2022 in a high-volume HPB center. Patients’ characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results

In total, 30 RLR and 16 TTL were included. Only wedge resections were performed in the TTL group, while 43% of the patients in the RLR group had an anatomical resection (p < 0.001). The difficulty score according to the IWATE difficulty scoring system was significantly higher in the RLR group (p < 0.001). Total operative time was similar between the two groups. Complication rates, either overall or major, were comparable between the two techniques and hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RLR group. Patients in the TTL group were found to have more pulmonary complications (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

RLR may provide some advantages over TTL for the resection of tumors located in the PS segments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777CrossRefPubMed Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Couinaud C (1954) Lobes et segments hépatiques: notes sur l’architecture anatomiques et chirurgicale du foie [Liver lobes and segments: notes on the anatomical architecture and surgery of the liver]. Presse Med 62(33):709–712 Couinaud C (1954) Lobes et segments hépatiques: notes sur l’architecture anatomiques et chirurgicale du foie [Liver lobes and segments: notes on the anatomical architecture and surgery of the liver]. Presse Med 62(33):709–712
3.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(3):825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(3):825–830CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F, Perotto LO, Brustia R, Bernard D et al (2015) A conceptual technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy based on facts and oncologic principles: the caudal approach. Ann Surg juin 261(6):1226–1231CrossRef Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F, Perotto LO, Brustia R, Bernard D et al (2015) A conceptual technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy based on facts and oncologic principles: the caudal approach. Ann Surg juin 261(6):1226–1231CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Morise Z (2016) Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior tumors using caudal approach and postural changes: a new technical approach. WJG 22(47):10267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morise Z (2016) Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior tumors using caudal approach and postural changes: a new technical approach. WJG 22(47):10267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Fuks D, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopic surgery of postero-lateral segments: a comparison between transthoracic and abdominal approach. Updates Surg juin 67(2):141–145CrossRef Fuks D, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopic surgery of postero-lateral segments: a comparison between transthoracic and abdominal approach. Updates Surg juin 67(2):141–145CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Inoue Y, Suzuki Y, Fujii K, Kawaguchi N, Ishii M, Masubuchi S et al (2017) Laparoscopic liver resection using the lateral approach from intercostal ports in segments VI, VII, and VIII. J Gastrointest Surg déc 21(12):2135–2143CrossRef Inoue Y, Suzuki Y, Fujii K, Kawaguchi N, Ishii M, Masubuchi S et al (2017) Laparoscopic liver resection using the lateral approach from intercostal ports in segments VI, VII, and VIII. J Gastrointest Surg déc 21(12):2135–2143CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ichida H, Ishizawa T, Tanaka M, Terasawa M, Watanabe G, Takeda Y et al (2017) Use of intercostal trocars for laparoscopic resection of subphrenic hepatic tumors. Surg Endosc mars 31(3):1280–1286CrossRef Ichida H, Ishizawa T, Tanaka M, Terasawa M, Watanabe G, Takeda Y et al (2017) Use of intercostal trocars for laparoscopic resection of subphrenic hepatic tumors. Surg Endosc mars 31(3):1280–1286CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Moisan F, Gayet B, Ward MA, Tabchouri N, Fuks D (2018) Segment 7 laparoscopic liver resection: is it possible to resect when metastatic lesions border suprahepatic veins? J Gastrointest Surg sept 22(9):1643–1644CrossRef Moisan F, Gayet B, Ward MA, Tabchouri N, Fuks D (2018) Segment 7 laparoscopic liver resection: is it possible to resect when metastatic lesions border suprahepatic veins? J Gastrointest Surg sept 22(9):1643–1644CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications: current status of robotic hepatectomy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol sept 112(3):295–301CrossRef Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications: current status of robotic hepatectomy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol sept 112(3):295–301CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, Choi GH, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y et al (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. WJG 25(12):1432–1444CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, Choi GH, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y et al (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. WJG 25(12):1432–1444CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Nota CL, Woo Y, Raoof M, Boerner T, Molenaar IQ, Choi GH et al (2019) Robotic versus open minor liver resections of the posterosuperior segments: a multinational, propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol févr 26(2):583–590CrossRef Nota CL, Woo Y, Raoof M, Boerner T, Molenaar IQ, Choi GH et al (2019) Robotic versus open minor liver resections of the posterosuperior segments: a multinational, propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol févr 26(2):583–590CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Boleslawski E, Petrovai G, Truant S, Dharancy S, Duhamel A, Salleron J et al (2012) Hepatic venous pressure gradient in the assessment of portal hypertension before liver resection in patients with cirrhosis. British J Surg 99(6):855–863CrossRef Boleslawski E, Petrovai G, Truant S, Dharancy S, Duhamel A, Salleron J et al (2012) Hepatic venous pressure gradient in the assessment of portal hypertension before liver resection in patients with cirrhosis. British J Surg 99(6):855–863CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg août 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg août 240(2):205–213CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H et al (2017) Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter analysis by the endoscopic liver surgery study group in Japan. J American Coll Surg 225(2):249-258e1CrossRef Tanaka S, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H et al (2017) Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter analysis by the endoscopic liver surgery study group in Japan. J American Coll Surg 225(2):249-258e1CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goodman ZD (2007) Grading and staging systems for inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 47(4):598–607CrossRefPubMed Goodman ZD (2007) Grading and staging systems for inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 47(4):598–607CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 30(3):1004–1013CrossRefPubMed Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 30(3):1004–1013CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hu Y, Guo K, Xu J, Xia T, Wang T, Liu N et al (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 44(4):615–628CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Guo K, Xu J, Xia T, Wang T, Liu N et al (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 44(4):615–628CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ziogas IA, Giannis D, Esagian SM, Economopoulos KP, Tohme S, Geller DA (2021) Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35(2):524–535CrossRefPubMed Ziogas IA, Giannis D, Esagian SM, Economopoulos KP, Tohme S, Geller DA (2021) Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35(2):524–535CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Manas D, Jiao L, Hilal MA, White SA (2021) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 110(3):290–300CrossRefPubMed Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Manas D, Jiao L, Hilal MA, White SA (2021) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 110(3):290–300CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Magistri P, Fontani A, Menonna F, Annecchiarico M et al (2021) Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 23:S731–S732 Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Magistri P, Fontani A, Menonna F, Annecchiarico M et al (2021) Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 23:S731–S732
23.
go back to reference Zhao Z, Yin Z, Pan L, Li C, Hu M, Lau WY et al (2021) Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver. Updates Surg juin 73(3):1007–1014CrossRef Zhao Z, Yin Z, Pan L, Li C, Hu M, Lau WY et al (2021) Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver. Updates Surg juin 73(3):1007–1014CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH, Cochran A, Khan A, Ocuin L et al (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center. HPB 21(7):906–911CrossRefPubMed Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH, Cochran A, Khan A, Ocuin L et al (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center. HPB 21(7):906–911CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J (2021) Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der robotischen Leberchirurgie—aktueller Stand 2020. Chirurg 92(2):107–114CrossRefPubMed Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J (2021) Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der robotischen Leberchirurgie—aktueller Stand 2020. Chirurg 92(2):107–114CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Scognamiglio P, Stüben BO, Heumann A, Li J, Izbicki JR, Perez D et al (2021) Advanced robotic surgery: liver, pancreas, and esophagus—the state of the art? Visc Med 37(6):505–510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scognamiglio P, Stüben BO, Heumann A, Li J, Izbicki JR, Perez D et al (2021) Advanced robotic surgery: liver, pancreas, and esophagus—the state of the art? Visc Med 37(6):505–510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Zhu P, Liao W, Yang DZ, Chen L, Guang ZW, Xiang ZB et al (2019) Learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 23(9):1778–1787CrossRefPubMed Zhu P, Liao W, Yang DZ, Chen L, Guang ZW, Xiang ZB et al (2019) Learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 23(9):1778–1787CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Efanov M, Alikhanov R, Tsvirkun V, Kazakov I, Melekhina O, Kim P et al (2017) Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB 19(9):818–824CrossRefPubMed Efanov M, Alikhanov R, Tsvirkun V, Kazakov I, Melekhina O, Kim P et al (2017) Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB 19(9):818–824CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Fiorelli S, Cioffi L, Menna C, Ibrahim M, De Blasi RA, Rendina EA et al (2020) Chronic pain after lung resection: risk factors, neuropathic pain, and quality of life. J Pain Symp Manag 60(2):326–335CrossRef Fiorelli S, Cioffi L, Menna C, Ibrahim M, De Blasi RA, Rendina EA et al (2020) Chronic pain after lung resection: risk factors, neuropathic pain, and quality of life. J Pain Symp Manag 60(2):326–335CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ziogas IA, Evangeliou AP, Mylonas KS, Athanasiadis DI, Cherouveim P, Geller DA et al (2021) Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Health Econ juin 22(4):585–604CrossRef Ziogas IA, Evangeliou AP, Mylonas KS, Athanasiadis DI, Cherouveim P, Geller DA et al (2021) Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Health Econ juin 22(4):585–604CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic liver resection in the posterosuperior segments as a way to extent the mini-invasive arsenal: a comparison with transthoracic laparoscopic approach
Authors
Pauline Denglos
Stéphanie Truant
Mehdi El Amrani
Guillaume Millet
Publication date
17-02-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09919-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2023 Go to the issue
SPONSORED

Mastering chronic pancreatitis pain: A multidisciplinary approach and practical solutions

Webinar | 06-02-2024 | 20:00 (CET)

Severe pain is the most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis. In this webinar, experts share the latest insights in pain management for chronic pancreatitis patients. Experts from a range of disciplines discuss pertinent cases and provide practical suggestions for use within clinical practice.

Sponsored by:
  • Viatris
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now