21-03-2024 | Labioplasty | Original Article
A Decade of Lawsuits Against Surgeons Performing Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery (FGCS) in Tehran, Iran
Authors:
Tahereh Eftekhar, Marjan Ghaemi, Zahra Shabannejad, Zeinab Mansouri, Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh, Elham Bazmi, Mehdi Foroozesh, Ilnaz Mohammadi, Nasim Eshraghi
Published in:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|
Issue 13/2024
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
The objective of this study is to evaluate the legal proceedings that arise from Female Genital Cosmetic Surgeries (FGCS) and analyze the reasons why women file complaints against their surgeons. Additionally, we examined the outcomes of the legal decisions associated with these complaints.
Methods
This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Tehran province, Iran, from 2012 to 2021. The primary data source for this study was forensic medical records, which were reviewed to gather relevant information. The collected data included the characteristics of the participants, the reasons for lawsuits, the procedure setting, and the outcomes of the legal decisions.
Results
A total of 121 patients were examined in the study, revealing that Labiaplasty was the most prevalent procedure (49.6%), followed by vaginoplasty (19.8%) and perineoplasty (13.2%). The most common complaints were related to cosmetic concerns (57%), lack of recovery (26.4%), and sexual dysfunctions (22.3%). Healthcare providers were found liable for malpractice in 52.1% of cases. Additionally, having the surgery performed by a gynecologist decreased the risk of malpractice (β = 0.21, p= 0.034), while procedures in private clinics increased the risk (β = 2.95, p = 0.040).
Conclusion
The study's findings emphasized the importance of providing women with comprehensive education and consultations to ensure they are well-informed about the potential outcomes and risks of FGCS. Furthermore, the study highlighted the significance of having these surgical procedures performed by skilled and experienced surgeons.
Level of Evidence V
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266.