Skip to main content
Top

Percutaneous CT-Guided Cryoablation of T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety

Abstract

Purpose

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has risen in recent decades, mainly due to the widespread use of diagnostic imaging. Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) is minimally invasive, making it favorable if surgery is contraindicated. This study evaluates the oncological efficacy and safety of PCA as a treatment for T1b RCC.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study included 35 patients with T1b RCC treated with PCA. Patients were included if they had at least 3 years of follow-up. Oncological outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Furthermore, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes were described, and postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification.

Results

The primary efficacy rate was 68.6%, with a median follow-up time of 34.7 months (range: 0–66.5 months), and the secondary efficacy rate was 77.1%, with a mean follow-up time of 41.6 months (range: 0–66.5 months). After primary PCA, 17.1% (n = 6) were incomplete. Local tumor progression was found in 14.3% (n = 5) of patients. The disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80.0%, 69.3%, and 60.0%, respectively. Four patients (11.4%) progressed from localized RCC to metastatic disease. The average decline in eGFR was 6.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 1 year after PCA. Complications were observed in 11.4% (n = 4) of patients.

Conclusion

This study found that treating T1b RCC with PCA was challenging. Local tumor control rates were low, and the risk for metastatic progression was high. However, PCA demonstrated a commendable safety profile, with few complications and good preservation of kidney function.

Level of Evidence

3, a retrospective cohort study.
Title
Percutaneous CT-Guided Cryoablation of T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety
Authors
Theresa Junker
Christian Greve Jensen
John Valtersson
Mie Gaedt Thorlund
Tommy Kjærgaard Nielsen
Jens Borgbjerg
Ole Graumann
Publication date
03-11-2025
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04242-0
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.

How can your team use biomarkers to improve management of AD? (Link opens in a new window)

0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)

Our experts explore using biomarker tests and interpreting results, establishing a shared decision-making approach with patients and caregivers, and applying biomarker testing to guide treatment strategies.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more

How can you integrate PET into your practice? (Link opens in a new window)

1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

PET imaging is playing an increasingly critical role in managing AD. Our expert-led program will empower you with practical strategies and real-world case studies to effectively integrate it into clinical practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more
Image Credits
Alzheimer’s disease in the biomarker era: preparing the multidisciplinary care team/© Springer Healthcare IME, Navigating neuroimaging in Alzheimer’s care: Practical applications and strategies for integration/© Springer Healthcare IME