Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 25-09-2024 | Intracranial Hypertension | Original work

Machine Learning Based Prediction of Imminent ICP Insults During Neurocritical Care of Traumatic Brain Injury

Authors: Peter Galos, Ludvig Hult, Dave Zachariah, Anders Lewén, Anders Hånell, Timothy Howells, Thomas B. Schön, Per Enblad

Published in: Neurocritical Care

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In neurointensive care, increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a feared secondary brain insult in traumatic brain injury (TBI). A system that predicts ICP insults before they emerge may facilitate early optimization of the physiology, which may in turn lead to stopping the predicted ICP insult from occurring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of ICP insults.

Methods

The models were trained to predict risk of ICP insults starting within 30 min, using the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset. A restricted dataset consisting of only monitoring data were used, and an unrestricted dataset using monitoring data as well as clinical data, demographic data, and radiological evaluations was used. Four different model classes were compared: Gaussian process regression, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and Extreme Gradient Boosted decision trees (XGBoost).

Results

Six hundred and two patients with TBI were included (total monitoring 138,411 h). On the task of predicting upcoming ICP insults, the Gaussian process regression model performed similarly on the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset (sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 93.9%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98.3%), as in earlier smaller studies. Using a more flexible model (XGBoost) resulted in a comparable performance (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 94.6%, AUROC 98.7%). Adding more clinical variables and features further improved the performance of the models slightly (XGBoost: sensitivity 94.1%, specificity of 94.6%, AUROC 98.8%).

Conclusions

Artificial intelligence models have potential to become valuable tools for predicting ICP insults in advance during neurointensive care. The fact that common off-the-shelf models, such as XGBoost, performed well in predicting ICP insults opens new possibilities that can lead to faster advances in the field and earlier clinical implementations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, et al. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(11):1004–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, et al. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(11):1004–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, et al. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1993;34(2):216–22.CrossRef Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, et al. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1993;34(2):216–22.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Miller JD, Becker DP, Ward JD, Sullivan HG, Adams WE, Rosner MJ. Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1977;47(4):503–16.CrossRefPubMed Miller JD, Becker DP, Ward JD, Sullivan HG, Adams WE, Rosner MJ. Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1977;47(4):503–16.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Elf K, Nilsson P, Enblad P. Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(9):2129–34.CrossRefPubMed Elf K, Nilsson P, Enblad P. Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(9):2129–34.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference McNamara R, Meka S, Anstey J, et al. Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Intracranial Hypertension Prediction Algorithms: A Narrative Review. J Neurotrauma 2022;neu.2022.0201. McNamara R, Meka S, Anstey J, et al. Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Intracranial Hypertension Prediction Algorithms: A Narrative Review. J Neurotrauma 2022;neu.2022.0201.
7.
go back to reference Van Hal ST, Van Der Jagt M, Van Genderen ME, Gommers D, Veenland JF. Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Intracranial Hypertension in Patients After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care [Internet] [Online ahead of print] [cited 2024 Jan 13];Available from: https://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01910-2 Van Hal ST, Van Der Jagt M, Van Genderen ME, Gommers D, Veenland JF. Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Intracranial Hypertension in Patients After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care [Internet] [Online ahead of print] [cited 2024 Jan 13];Available from: https://​link.​springer.​com/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12028-023-01910-2
8.
go back to reference Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P, Lewén A. Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome. Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118(3):169–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P, Lewén A. Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome. Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118(3):169–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Güiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, Van den Berghe G, Meyfroidt G. Novel Methods to Predict Increased Intracranial Pressure During Intensive Care and Long-Term Neurologic Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation in a Multicenter Dataset. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):554–64.CrossRefPubMed Güiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, Van den Berghe G, Meyfroidt G. Novel Methods to Predict Increased Intracranial Pressure During Intensive Care and Long-Term Neurologic Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation in a Multicenter Dataset. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):554–64.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Myers RB, Lazaridis C, Jermaine CM, Robertson CS, Rusin CG. Predicting Intracranial Pressure and Brain Tissue Oxygen Crises in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(9):1754–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Myers RB, Lazaridis C, Jermaine CM, Robertson CS, Rusin CG. Predicting Intracranial Pressure and Brain Tissue Oxygen Crises in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(9):1754–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Güiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, et al. Early Detection of Increased Intracranial Pressure Episodes in Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation in an Adult and in a Pediatric Cohort. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):e316–20.CrossRefPubMed Güiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, et al. Early Detection of Increased Intracranial Pressure Episodes in Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation in an Adult and in a Pediatric Cohort. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):e316–20.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Carra G, Güiza F, Depreitere B, et al. Prediction model for intracranial hypertension demonstrates robust performance during external validation on the CENTER-TBI dataset. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(1):124–6.CrossRefPubMed Carra G, Güiza F, Depreitere B, et al. Prediction model for intracranial hypertension demonstrates robust performance during external validation on the CENTER-TBI dataset. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(1):124–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wijayatunga P, Koskinen L-OD, Sundström N. Probabilistic prediction of increased intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):9600. Wijayatunga P, Koskinen L-OD, Sundström N. Probabilistic prediction of increased intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):9600.
14.
go back to reference Petrov D, Miranda SP, Balu R, et al. Prediction of intracranial pressure crises after severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning algorithms. J Neurosurg 2023;1–8. Petrov D, Miranda SP, Balu R, et al. Prediction of intracranial pressure crises after severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning algorithms. J Neurosurg 2023;1–8.
15.
go back to reference Carra G, Güiza F, Piper I, et al. Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Prediction of Doses of Harmful Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2023;40(5–6):514–22.CrossRefPubMed Carra G, Güiza F, Piper I, et al. Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Prediction of Doses of Harmful Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2023;40(5–6):514–22.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Howells TP, Jones PA, Piper IR, Souter MJ, Miller JD. Design of a research database for the study of secondary insults following head injury. J Neurotrauma 1995;471(12). Howells TP, Jones PA, Piper IR, Souter MJ, Miller JD. Design of a research database for the study of secondary insults following head injury. J Neurotrauma 1995;471(12).
17.
go back to reference Hüser M, Kündig A, Karlen W, De Luca V, Jaggi M. Forecasting intracranial hypertension using multi-scale waveform metrics. Physiol Meas. 2020;41(1): 014001.CrossRefPubMed Hüser M, Kündig A, Karlen W, De Luca V, Jaggi M. Forecasting intracranial hypertension using multi-scale waveform metrics. Physiol Meas. 2020;41(1): 014001.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Fourth Edition Neurosurg. 2017;80(1):6–15.CrossRef Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Fourth Edition Neurosurg. 2017;80(1):6–15.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Galos P, Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P. Capturing of intracranial pressure treatment during neurointensive care in patients with acute brain injury using a novel tablet-based method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022;36(6):1731–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Galos P, Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P. Capturing of intracranial pressure treatment during neurointensive care in patients with acute brain injury using a novel tablet-based method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022;36(6):1731–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Ferri C, Hernández-Orallo J, Modroiu R. An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2009;30(1):27–38.CrossRef Ferri C, Hernández-Orallo J, Modroiu R. An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2009;30(1):27–38.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Varoquaux G, Colliot O. Evaluating machine learning models and their diagnostic value. In: Colliot O, editor. Machine learning for brain disorders. New York: Springer; 2023. p. 601–30.CrossRef Varoquaux G, Colliot O. Evaluating machine learning models and their diagnostic value. In: Colliot O, editor. Machine learning for brain disorders. New York: Springer; 2023. p. 601–30.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python 3 reference manual. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace; 2009. Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python 3 reference manual. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace; 2009.
26.
go back to reference Tougui I, Jilbab A, Mhamdi JE. Impact of the choice of cross-validation techniques on the results of machine learning-based diagnostic applications. Healthc Inform Res. 2021;27(3):189–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tougui I, Jilbab A, Mhamdi JE. Impact of the choice of cross-validation techniques on the results of machine learning-based diagnostic applications. Healthc Inform Res. 2021;27(3):189–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Wenzel F, Galy-Fajou T, Donner C, Kloft M, Opper M. Efficient Gaussian process classification using Pólya-Gamma data augmentation. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2019;33(01):5417–24. Wenzel F, Galy-Fajou T, Donner C, Kloft M, Opper M. Efficient Gaussian process classification using Pólya-Gamma data augmentation. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2019;33(01):5417–24.
28.
go back to reference Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Publ Conf Pap 3rd Int Conf Learn Represent San Diego 2015 Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Publ Conf Pap 3rd Int Conf Learn Represent San Diego 2015
30.
go back to reference Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Mach Learn PYTHON Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Mach Learn PYTHON
31.
32.
Metadata
Title
Machine Learning Based Prediction of Imminent ICP Insults During Neurocritical Care of Traumatic Brain Injury
Authors
Peter Galos
Ludvig Hult
Dave Zachariah
Anders Lewén
Anders Hånell
Timothy Howells
Thomas B. Schön
Per Enblad
Publication date
25-09-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Neurocritical Care
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02119-7

Advances in Alzheimer's

Alzheimer's research and care is changing rapidly. Keep up with the latest developments from key international conferences, together with expert insights on how to integrate these advances into practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more