Skip to main content
Top

Evaluation of Overall Health State, Treatment Burden, and Satisfaction with Insulin Efsitora Alfa (Efsitora) vs. Daily Comparator in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the QWINT Clinical Trial Program

  • Open Access
  • 27-01-2026
  • Insulins
  • Original Research

Abstract

Introduction

Once-weekly efsitora resulted in similar efficacy and safety compared with daily basal insulins glargine or degludec in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes in the QWINT phase 3 development program. To fully assess once-weekly insulin’s potential and address common barriers associated with insulin therapy (e.g., clinical inertia, fear of injections, treatment complexity), other aspects of the participants’ treatment experiences were investigated using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements. The results of these PROs from QWINT-1 to -4 are presented here.

Methods

Six different PRO instruments were completed across the studies at primary timepoints and treatment period endpoint (QWINT-1, week 26/52; QWINT-2, week 26/52; QWINT-3, week 26/52/78; QWINT-4, week 26) by participants enrolled in the phase 3 QWINT clinical trials. The PRO instruments included Treatment Related Impact Measure—Diabetes (Trim-D) (QWINT-1, -2, and -3), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) (QWINT-1 and -3), Simplicity of Diabetes Treatment Questionnaire (SIM-Q) (QWINT-1, -2, and -3), Basal Insulin Experience (BIE) (all QWINTs), EQ-5D-5L (QWINT-2, -3, and -4), and Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2(SF-36v2) (QWINT-2).

Results

Efsitora-treated participants demonstrated greater or similar improvements than comparators for most of the measured PROs at the primary timepoint in all four studies, particularly in QWINT-3 and -4 (prior insulin experience). Notably, for those treated with efsitora, there were significantly larger improvements than comparators in the PRO domains of treatment burden, daily life, diabetes management, compliance, satisfaction, and psychological health, as measured using the TRIM-D and DTSQc. Participants treated with efsitora had similar scores across both health-related quality of life measures, EQ-5D-5L and SF-36v2, at the primary endpoint when evaluated versus the comparator.

Conclusions

Participants in the QWINT-1 to -4 studies demonstrated a strong preference for efsitora, along with improved overall functioning, well-being, and treatment burden compared to daily basal insulins.

Clinical trial registration number for QWINT studies

QWINT-1: NCT05662332; QWINT-2: NCT05362058; QWINT-3: NCT05275400; QWINT-4: NCT05462756.
Title
Evaluation of Overall Health State, Treatment Burden, and Satisfaction with Insulin Efsitora Alfa (Efsitora) vs. Daily Comparator in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the QWINT Clinical Trial Program
Authors
Eden Miller
Michael B. Davidson
Harpreet S. Bajaj
Julio Rosenstock
Athena Philis-Tsimikis
Richard M. Bergenstal
Michael Case
Liza Ilag
Rebecca Threlkeld
Esther Levasseur
Felicia Gelsey
Publication date
27-01-2026
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01833-5
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on progress in colorectal cancer

CRC remains a major global health burden, but advances in screening, treatment, and lifestyle-based prevention continue to reshape clinical practice. Gain insights into how the latest research can be leveraged to optimize patient care across the CRC continuum.

Prof. Antoni Castells
Prof. Harpreet Wasan
Prof. Edward Giovannucci
Watch now
Image Credits
Colon cancer illustration/© (M) KATERYNA KON / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY / Getty Images