Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
2024 ESMO Congress 2024 ERS Congress 2024 EASD Congress 2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.

Published: Thursday 12th December 2024
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Oral Health
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Injectable Filler | Research

Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites

Authors: Hanife Altınışık, Esra Özyurt

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate variations in the surface roughness and gloss of different single-shade resin composites after polishing with a range of systems.

Methods

In total, 120 specimens were prepared from three different types of single-shade resin composites (supra-nanospherical—Omnichroma, nanohybrid—Charisma Diamond One, and microhybrid— Essentia Universal). The specimens were placed in distilled water and stored at 37 °C for 24 h. Each resin composite (n = 40) was divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the finishing/polishing (F/P) system: Mylar strip (control), Sof-Lex (multi-step), Twist Dia (two-step), and OneGloss (one-step). Surface roughness and gloss were measured. Surface characteristics were evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honestly significant difference test were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

Results

Among all the composites, both the highest surface roughness and lowest gloss values were obtained in the groups treated with the OneGloss polishing system (p < 0.05). Compared with all the composites, Omnichroma had the lowest surface roughness and highest gloss values (except Twist Dia) both unpolished and after polishing with all the F/P systems (p < 0.05). All composites treated with the Twist Dia F/P system had similar gloss values. The results of the AFM and SEM analyses were consistent with the surface roughness measurements.

Conclusions

The gloss values of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites after F/P using the two-step system was superior to that of the traditional multistep system. The surface of the supra-nanofilled resin-based composite was smoother than that of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites.
Literature
1.
Kobayashi S, et al. Color adjustment potential of single-shade resin composite to various-shade human teeth: Effect of structural color phenomenon. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(4):1033–40.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Altınışık H, Özyurt E. Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of different single-shade resin composites to human teeth of various shades. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(2):889–96.CrossRefPubMed
4.
de Abreu JLB, et al. Analysis of the color matching of universal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(2):269–76.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Lucena C, et al. Optical behavior of one-shaded resin-based composites. Dent Mater. 2021;37(5):840–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Pereira Sanchez N, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(5):465–70.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Trifkovic B, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Color adjustment potential of resin composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1601–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Kakaboura A, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(1):155–63.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Nithya K, et al. Evaluation of Surface Roughness, hardness, and gloss of composites after three different finishing and polishing techniques: an in Vitro Study. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e7037.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13(4):258–69.CrossRefPubMed
11.
da Costa JB, et al. Visually acceptable gloss threshold for resin composite and polishing systems. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021;152(5):385–92.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Dennis T, et al. Reduced-step composite polishing systems - a new gold standard? J Dent. 2021;112:103769.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Bilgili Can D, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristic and bacterial adhesion of low-shrinkage resin composites. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(8):1783–93.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Soliman HAN, et al. Effect of different Polishing systems on the Surface Roughness and gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin composites. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(2):259–65.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Kemaloglu H, Karacolak G, Turkun LS. Can reduced-step polishers be as effective as multiple-step polishers in Enhancing Surface smoothness? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(1):31–40.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Sarac D, et al. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(1):33–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ishii R, et al. Effects of Finishing and Polishing methods on the Surface Roughness and Surface Free Energy of bulk-fill Resin composites. Oper Dent. 2020;45(2):E91–104.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Da Costa J, et al. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(4):214–24. discussion 225-6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Eliades G. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites. Oper Dent. 2013;38(1):E1–12.PubMed
20.
Alharbi G, et al. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface properties of universal single shade resin-based composites. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2007;32(2):185–92.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(2):198–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Costa G, et al. Effect of additional polishing methods on the physical surface properties of different nanocomposites: SEM and AFM study. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81(12):1467–73.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Antonson SA, et al. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2011;39(Suppl 1):e9–17.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Bashetty K, Joshi S. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(1):34–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Aytac F, et al. Effects of Novel Finishing and Polishing systems on Surface Roughness and morphology of Nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28(4):247–61.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Sang EJ, et al. Influence of a new polishing system on changes in gloss and surface roughness of resin composites after polishing and brushing. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(3):727–35.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Aydın N, et al. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(5):e446–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Kılıç V, Gök A. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of various bulk-fill and nano-filled resin-based composites: an atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(9):2058–67.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Aksoy Vaizoğlu G, Ulusoy N, Güleç L, Alagöz. Effect of Coffee and Polishing systems on the Color Change of a Conventional Resin Composite repaired by Universal Resin composites: an in Vitro Study. Mater (Basel), 2023. 16(17).
31.
Gömleksiz S, Gömleksiz O. The effect of contemporary finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of bulk fill resin composite and nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(6):915–23.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Pala K, et al. Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(2):278–89.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Hosoya Y, et al. Effects of polishing on surface roughness, gloss, and color of resin composites. J Oral Sci. 2011;53(3):283–91.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Paolone G et al. Effect of Finishing systems on Surface Roughness and gloss of full-body bulk-fill Resin composites. Mater (Basel), 2020. 13(24).
35.
Cook M, Thomas K. Evaluation of gloss meters for measurement of moulded plastics. Polym Test. 1990;9(4):233–44.CrossRef
36.
Takanashi E, et al. Influence of abrasive particle size on surface properties of flowable composites. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(6):780–6.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Kaizer MR, et al. Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):e41–78.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites
Authors
Hanife Altınışık
Esra Özyurt
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05163-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Evaluation of mechanical properties of anatomically customized fiber posts using E-glass short fiber-reinforced composite to restore weakened endodontically treated premolars

  • Open Access
  • Research

Sonic-assisted antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a strategy for enhancing lateral canal disinfection

Properties of a novel composite elastomeric polymer vinyl polyether siloxane in comparison to its parent materials: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Correction: Assessment of traumatic mandibular nerve using MR neurography sequence: a preliminary study

  • Open Access
  • Correction

Evaluation of surface tensions and root-dentin surface contact angles of different endodontic irrigation solutions

  • Open Access
  • Research

In regard to Castagnola et al. (doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03050-7)