Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

07-12-2024 | In Vitro Fertilization | Commentary

Greater PGT-A utilization in IVF clinics does not improve live birth rates but relates to IVF center ownership: a preliminary report

Authors: Pasquale Patrizio, Sarah Darmon, David H. Barad, Norbert Gleicher

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 1/2025

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aims to assess whether increased utilization for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) relates to improved live birth rates in IVF and whether IVF clinic ownership relates to PGT-A utilization. In a retrospective cohort study involving > 90% of US IVF clinics reporting to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), stratified for ages (< 35, 35–37, 38–40, 41–42, and ≥ 43 years), and with reference point cycle start, we investigated whether PGT-A utilization related to live birth rates and ownership format as either physician-, academic/hospital/military, or equity/venture capital (VC) owned clinics. The lowest PGT-A-utilizing clinics reported significantly better live birth rates than the highest-utilizing clinics. Youngest patients (under age 35) were most adversely affected by high PGT-A utilization. Clinic ownership, moreover, is significantly related to the utilization of PGT-A, with equity and/or venture capital (VC)-owned clinics being significantly overrepresented among high-utilizing clinics in comparison to clinics owned by private physicians or by academia, hospitals, and the military. PGT-A, overall, reduces live birth chances in IVF, with the risks of adverse outcome effects increasing with growing PGT-A utilization in primarily younger women under age 35. Equity/VC ownership favors increasing PGT-A utilization in comparison to private physician and academic/hospital/military clinic ownership. These findings suggest intervention strategies to reverse excessive PGT-A utilization.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gleicher N, Patrizio P, Brivanlou A. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy – a castle built on sand. Trends Mol Med. 2021;27(8):731–42.CrossRefPubMed Gleicher N, Patrizio P, Brivanlou A. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy – a castle built on sand. Trends Mol Med. 2021;27(8):731–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kucherov A, Fazzari M, Lieman H, Ball GD, Doody K, Jindal S. PGT-A is associated with reduced cumulative live birth rates in first reported stimulation cycles age ≤ 40: an analysis of 133,494 autologous cycles reported to SARS CORS. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(1):137–49.CrossRefPubMed Kucherov A, Fazzari M, Lieman H, Ball GD, Doody K, Jindal S. PGT-A is associated with reduced cumulative live birth rates in first reported stimulation cycles age ≤ 40: an analysis of 133,494 autologous cycles reported to SARS CORS. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(1):137–49.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cornelisse S, Zagers M, Kostova E, Fleischer K, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9:CD005291.PubMed Cornelisse S, Zagers M, Kostova E, Fleischer K, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9:CD005291.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gleicher N, Albertini DF, Patrizio P, Orvieto R, Adashi E. The uncertain science of preimplantation and prenatal genetic testing. Nat Med. 2022;28(3):442–4.CrossRefPubMed Gleicher N, Albertini DF, Patrizio P, Orvieto R, Adashi E. The uncertain science of preimplantation and prenatal genetic testing. Nat Med. 2022;28(3):442–4.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gleicher N, Metzger J, Croft G, Kushnir V, Barad DH, Hudson C, et al. A single trophectoderm biopsy at blastocyst stage is mathematically unable to determine embryo ploidy accurately enough for clinical use. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gleicher N, Metzger J, Croft G, Kushnir V, Barad DH, Hudson C, et al. A single trophectoderm biopsy at blastocyst stage is mathematically unable to determine embryo ploidy accurately enough for clinical use. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Barad DH, Albertini DF, Molinari E, Gleicher N. IVF outcomes of embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsy previously refused transfer: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(6):1194–206.CrossRefPubMed Barad DH, Albertini DF, Molinari E, Gleicher N. IVF outcomes of embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsy previously refused transfer: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(6):1194–206.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gleicher N, Patrizio P, Mochizuki L, Barad DH. Previously reported and here added cases demonstrate euploid pregnancies followed by PGT-A as “mosaic” as well as “aneuploid” designated embryos. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023;21:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gleicher N, Patrizio P, Mochizuki L, Barad DH. Previously reported and here added cases demonstrate euploid pregnancies followed by PGT-A as “mosaic” as well as “aneuploid” designated embryos. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023;21:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Hynes JS, Forman EJ. Transfer of the fittest: using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to select embryo(s) most likely to lead to live birth. F S Sci. 2023;4(2S):2–6.PubMed Hynes JS, Forman EJ. Transfer of the fittest: using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to select embryo(s) most likely to lead to live birth. F S Sci. 2023;4(2S):2–6.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services. 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services. 2020.
10.
go back to reference Ohishi S, Otani T. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: helpful but not first choice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(1):161–8.CrossRefPubMed Ohishi S, Otani T. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: helpful but not first choice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(1):161–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Patrizio P, Albertini DF, Gleicher N, Caplan A. The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(2):305–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patrizio P, Albertini DF, Gleicher N, Caplan A. The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(2):305–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Von Schondord-Gleicher A, Mochizuki L, Orvieto R, Patrizio P, Caplan AS, Gleicher N. Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(3):591–604.CrossRef Von Schondord-Gleicher A, Mochizuki L, Orvieto R, Patrizio P, Caplan AS, Gleicher N. Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(3):591–604.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mastenbroek S, de Wert G, Adashi EY. The imperative of responsible innovation in reproductive Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2096–100.CrossRefPubMed Mastenbroek S, de Wert G, Adashi EY. The imperative of responsible innovation in reproductive Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2096–100.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Greater PGT-A utilization in IVF clinics does not improve live birth rates but relates to IVF center ownership: a preliminary report
Authors
Pasquale Patrizio
Sarah Darmon
David H. Barad
Norbert Gleicher
Publication date
07-12-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 1/2025
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03340-1

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.   

Prof. Martha Hickey
Dr. Claudia Barth
Dr. Samar El Khoudary
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now
Video