Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Impact of normal vs. caesarean deliveries on child nutritional status and mortality in India: insights from NFHS-5 data

Authors: Ujjwal Das, Nihar Ranjan Rout

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Objective

Skilled birth attendance and place of delivery have a significant effect on child growth. The present paper examined the mode of delivery and its impact on child health among children 0–59 months in India.

Methods

A total of 200,794 samples were used in the study. Among them, 45,784 births were delivered by C-section, and the remaining 150,010 births were delivered through normal delivery. Life table estimation of mortality, as well as bivariate and multivariate logistic regression, were used to identify the association between child health and mode of delivery using data from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey conducted in 2019-21.

Results

The study results indicate that children born through normal delivery had significantly lower rates of stunting, wasting, and underweight compared to those born via C-section. Additionally, the likelihood of a new-born baby dying during the neonatal period was higher for those delivered by C-section compared to those delivered vaginally, which holds true for various background characteristics. Mothers with a 3rd or higher order birth who deliver via C-section face a higher risk of their baby dying during the neonatal and infant periods compared to those with a 2nd order birth.

Conclusion

The conclusion of the study found that C-section delivery may adversely affect child undernutrition as compared to normal birth. These findings would help formulate the policies and implement actions that would improve the quality of painless labor and immediate delivery in health facilities particularly public hospitals and shall reduce the C-section birth.

WHO. Levels and trends in child malnutrition, WHO, Geneva. Switzerland, 2018. http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/2018-jmebrochure.pdf

Black, R. E., Victora, C. G., Walker, S. P., Bhutta, Z. A., Christian, P., De Onis,M., … Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. The lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X

Liu, L., Johnson, H. L., Cousens, S., Perin, J., Scott, S., Lawn, J. E., … Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of WHO and UNICEF. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. The lancet. 2012;379(9832):2151–2161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1

Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, International Child Development Steering Group. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369(9555):60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60032-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chen H, Tan D. Cesarean section or natural childbirth? Cesarean birth may damage your health. Front Psychol. 2019;10:351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N, Dowswell T. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD003519.PubMed

Zanardo, V., Pigozzo, A., Wainer, G., Marchesoni, D., Gasparoni, A., Di Fabio, S.,… Trevisanuto, D. Early lactation failure and formula adoption after elective caesarean delivery: cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2013;98(1):F37-F41. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2011-301218

Pérez-Ríos N, Ramos-Valencia G, Ortiz AP. Cesarean delivery as a barrier for breastfeeding initiation: the Puerto Rican experience. J Hum Lactation. 2008;24(3):293–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334408316078CrossRef

Radha K, Devi GP, Manjula RV, Chandrasekharan PA. Study on rising trends of caesarean section (c-section): a bio-sociological effect. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(8):10–3.

10.

Khanal V, Karkee R, Lee AH, Binns CW. Adverse obstetric symptoms and rural–urban difference in cesarean delivery in Rupandehi district, Western Nepal: a cohort study. Reproductive Health. 2016;13(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0128-xCrossRef

11.

Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities-analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5533-3CrossRef

12.

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436–7.

13.

World Health Organization. Joint interregional conference on appropriate technology for birth, fortaleza, Brazil, 22–26 april 1985: summary report. In Joint Interregional Conference on Appropriate Technology for Birth, Fortaleza, Brazil, 22–26 April 1985: summary report. 1985.

14.

Dumont A, De Bernis L, Bouvier-olle MH, Bréart G, MOMA Study Group. Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;358(9290):1328–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06414-5CrossRefPubMed

15.

Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium‐, and high‐income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006;33(4):270–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00118.xCrossRefPubMed

16.

Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, Wagner M. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.xCrossRefPubMed

17.

Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Wojdyla D. Determinants of caesarean section rates in developed countries: supply, demand and opportunities for control. World Health Rep. 2010;29:1–22.

18.

Maine D, Wardlaw TM, Ward VM. Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services. United Nations Children’s Fund; 1997.

19.

World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates (no. WHO/RHR/15.02). World Health Organization; 2015.

20.

Ye J, Betrán AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014;41(3):237–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12104CrossRefPubMed

21.

UNICEF. The state of the world’s children 2009: maternal and newborn health. Unicef. 2008;9.

22.

Berhan Y, Berhan A. Skilled health personnel attended delivery as a proxy indicator for maternal and perinatal mortality: a systematic review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014;24:69–80. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v24i0.7SCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned cesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2271–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.16176CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned repeat cesarean section at term and adverse childhood health outcomes: a record-linkage study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(3):e1001973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001973CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Polidano C, Zhu A, Bornstein JC. The relation between cesarean birth and child cognitive development. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10831-yCrossRef

26.

Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Joner G, Cinek O, Svensson J, Goldacre MJ, Patterson CC. Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia. 2008;51(5):726–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-0941-zCrossRefPubMed

27.

Cho CE, Norman M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):249–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.009CrossRefPubMed

28.

Thavagnanam S, Fleming J, Bromley A, Shields MD, Cardwell CR. A meta-analysis of the association between caesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Experimental Allergy. 2008;38(4):629–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02780.xCrossRef

29.

Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2013;37(7):893–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.195CrossRef

30.

Taras H, Potts-Datema W. Chronic health conditions and student performance at school. J Sch Health. 2005;75(7):255–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb06686.xCrossRefPubMed

31.

Taras H, Potts-Datema W. Obesity and student performance at school. J Sch Health. 2005;75(8):291–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00040.xCrossRefPubMed

32.

Rowe-Murray HJ, Fisher JR. Baby friendly hospital practices: cesarean section is a persistent barrier to early initiation of breastfeeding. Birth. 2002;29(2):124–31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00172.xCrossRefPubMed

33.

Ghana statistical service (GSS), Ghana health service (GHS), and ICF international. 2015. Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2014, GSS, GHS, and ICF International, Rockville, MD, USA, 2015.

34.

Service GS. Ghana 2003: results from the demographic and health survey. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;36:158–62.

35.

Khadem N, Khadivzadeh T. The intelligence quotient of school aged children delivered by cesarean section and vaginal delivery. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2010;15(3):135.PubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Tian YT. China is not the world’s first cesarean section rate. Beijing: Guangming Daily. 2017.

37.

Nakamura-Pereira M, do, Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Torres JA, Dias MAB, Moreira ME. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reproductive health. 2016;13(3):245–256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7

38.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–2016: India; IIPS: Mumbai, India. 2017; Available online: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/NFHS4Reports/India.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2018).

39.

Gebremedhin S. Trend and socio-demographic differentials of caesarean section rate in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: analysis based on Ethiopia demographic and health surveys data. Reproductive Health. 2014;11(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-14CrossRef

40.

Wang BS, Zhou LF, Coulter D, Liang H, Zhong Y, Guo YN, Gao ES. Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-78CrossRef

41.

Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5):907–12.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Farrell SA. Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: it’s time to include pelvic injury in the risk–benefit equation. CMAJ. 2002;166(3):337–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Huang X, Wang ML, Jing J. The effect of cesarean section on neuropsychiatric development in children. Foreign Med Sci. 2004;15:4–6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2004.01.002CrossRef

44.

WHO MULTICENTRE GROWTH REFERENCE STUDY GROUP. WHO Child Growth standards: based on length/height-for age, weight-for-age, weight-for-age and body mass index for age-methods and development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

45.

Das U, Chaplot B, Azamathulla HM. The role of place of delivery in preventing neonatal and infant mortality rate in India. Geographies. 2021;1(1):47–62. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/1/1/4#CrossRef

46.

Srivastava S, Chaurasia H, Singh KJK, Chaudhary P. Exploring the spatial patterns of cesarean section delivery in India: evidence from National Family Health Survey-4. Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2020;8(2):414–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.09.012CrossRef

47.

Paixao, E. S., Bottomley, C., Pescarini, J. M., Wong, K. L., Cardim, L. L., Ribeiro Silva, R. D. C., … Campbell, O. M. Associations between cesarean delivery and child mortality: A national record linkage longitudinal study of 17.8 million births in Brazil. PLoS medicine. 2021;18(10):e1003791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003791

48.

Elnakib S, Abdel-Tawab N, Orbay D, Hassanein N. Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2558-2CrossRef

49.

Dahlen HG, Tracy S, Tracy M, Bisits A, Brown C, Thornton C. Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001723. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Einarsdóttir K, Haggar F, Pereira G, et al. Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002789. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Kamal SM. Preference for institutional delivery and caesarean sections in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31(1):96. https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v31i1.14754CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Kamal SM. Factors affecting utilization of skilled maternity care services among married adolescents in Bangladesh. Asian Popul Stud. 2009;5(2):153–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730902992075CrossRef

53.

Caldwell JC, Celik Y, Hotchkiss DR. Maternal education as a factor in child mortality. World Health Forum. The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1797–806.

54.

Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, Malloy MH. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with no indicated risk, United States, 1998–2001 birth cohorts. Birth. 2006;33(3):175–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00102.xCrossRefPubMed

56.

Paixao, E. S., Bottomley, C., Pescarini, J. M., Wong, K. L., Cardim, L. L., Ribeiro Silva, R. D. C., … Campbell, O. M. Associations between cesarean delivery and child mortality: a national record linkage longitudinal study of 17.8 million births in Brazil. PLoS medicine. 2021;18(10):e1003791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003791

57.

Hernán MA. The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). 2010;21(1)13. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c1ea43

58.

Saaka M, Hammond AY. Caesarean section delivery and risk of poor childhood growth. J Nutr Metabolism. 2020;2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6432754

59.

Rahman M, Khan N, Rahman A, Alam M, Khan A. Long-term effects of caesarean delivery on health and behavioural outcomes of the mother and child in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2022;41(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-022-00326-6CrossRef

60.

Roduit, C., Scholtens, S., de Jongste, J. C., Wijga, A. H., Gerritsen, J., Postma,D. S., … Smit, H. A. Asthma at 8 years of age in children born by caesarean section. Thorax. 2009;64(2):107–113. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2008.100875

61.

WHO, U., USAID, A., &, AED U. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

62.

Belachew A. Timely initiation of breastfeeding and associated factors among mothers of infants age 0–6 months old in Bahir Dar City, Northwest, Ethiopia, 2017: a community based cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0196-3CrossRef

63.

Tewabe T. Timely initiation of breastfeeding and associated factors among mothers in Motta town, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia, 2015: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1108-4CrossRef

64.

Esteves TMB, Daumas RP, Oliveira MICD, Andrade CA D. F. D., Leite IC. Factors associated to breastfeeding in the first hour of life: systematic review. Revista de saude publica. 2014;48:697–708. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005278

65.

Prior E, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, Philipps LH, Modi N, Hyde MJ. Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(5):1113–35. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.030254CrossRefPubMed

66.

Batiro B, Demissie T, Halala Y, Anjulo AA. Determinants of stunting among children aged 6–59 months at Kindo Didaye Woreda, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: unmatched case control study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0189106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Tun, H. M., Bridgman, S. L., Chari, R., Field, C. J., Guttman, D. S., Becker, A. B.,… Kozyrskyj, A. L. Roles of birth mode and infant gut microbiota in intergenerational transmission of overweight and obesity from mother to offspring. JAMA pediatrics. 2018;172(4):368–377 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5535

68.

Scott JA, Binns CW, Oddy WH. Predictors of delayed onset of lactation. Matern Child Nutr. 2007;3(3):186–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Simons CJR, Ritchie SK, Mullett MD. Relationships between parental ratings of infant temperament, risk status and delivery method. J Paedia Health Care. 1992;6:240–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5245(92)90021-UCrossRef

70.

Hillan E. Caesarean section: psychosocial effects. Nurs Stand. 1991;50:30–3. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.5.50.30.s35CrossRef

71.

Di SM. The study on 4–7 years old cesarean section children’s behavioral characteristics. Master’s Thesis. Shanghai: East China Normal University. 2009.

72.

Sandall, J., Tribe, R. M., Avery, L., Mola, G., Visser, G. H., Homer, C. S., … Temmerman,M. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5

73.

Sufang G, Padmadas SS, Fengmin Z, Brown JJ, Stones RW. Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:755–62. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.06.035808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Impact of normal vs. caesarean deliveries on child nutritional status and mortality in India: insights from NFHS-5 data
Authors: Ujjwal Das
Nihar Ranjan Rout
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05149-4

Comparison of early characteristics of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome and Kawasaki disease in children and the course of Kawasaki disease in the pandemic

Open Access
Kawasaki Disease
Original Research

The association between initial post-resuscitation diastolic blood pressure and survival after pediatric cardiac arrest: a retrospective study

Open Access
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Original Research

Sex difference in nocturnal blood pressure dipping in adolescents with varying degrees of adiposity

Open Access
Obesity
Original Research

Surgical management and outcomes of renal tumors with inferior vena cava extension among children: a single center retrospective study from Pakistan

Open Access
Renal Cancer
Original Research

A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes of pediatric fulminant myocarditis

Open Access
ECMO
Original Research

Efficacy of azithromycin combined with intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a meta-analysis

Open Access
Azithromycin
Original Research

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

Live
Webinar | 29-01-2025 | 18:00 (CET)

Growing numbers of young people are using e-cigarettes, despite warnings of respiratory effects and addiction. How can doctors tackle the epidemic, and what health effects should you prepare to manage in your clinics?

Watch it live: Wednesday 29th January, 18:00-19:30 CET

Prof. Ann McNeill

Dr. Debbie Robson

Benji Horwell

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Join the webinar

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Springer Medicine

Impact of normal vs. caesarean deliveries on child nutritional status and mortality in India: insights from NFHS-5 data

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Comparison of early characteristics of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome and Kawasaki disease in children and the course of Kawasaki disease in the pandemic

The association between initial post-resuscitation diastolic blood pressure and survival after pediatric cardiac arrest: a retrospective study

Sex difference in nocturnal blood pressure dipping in adolescents with varying degrees of adiposity

Surgical management and outcomes of renal tumors with inferior vena cava extension among children: a single center retrospective study from Pakistan

A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes of pediatric fulminant myocarditis

Efficacy of azithromycin combined with intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a meta-analysis

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content