Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Hysterectomy | Research

Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study

Authors: Xian Wu, Xin Li, Aijie Xie, Jia Liu, Tianjiao Liu, Yunyi Su, Ying Liu, Wei Cheng, Ying Jin, Lulu Wang, Yujian Jia, Jianmei Liao, Hui Wang, Xia Yu, Ling Zhang, Yalan Li, Li He, Yonghong Lin, Xiaoqin Gan

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is widely recognized for its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain and the absence of visible scarring. However, the anatomical specificity required for vNOTES may increase the risk of injury to nearby organs, such as the rectum and bladder. This study aims to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of vNOTES compared to transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for Hysterectomy.

Methods

The Longitudinal Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Study (LovNOTESS), conducted in Chengdu, China, included 192 patients who underwent hysterectomy between May and October 2023. This study prospectively collected and compared perioperative and follow-up data between the two groups.

Results

The vNOTES group demonstrated shorter surgery times, postoperative flatus time, and hospital stays, but it also had a higher conversion rate. Specifically, the vNOTES approach reduced surgery duration by approximately 29.8 min (95% CI: -41.31, -18.34, P < 0.001) but increased intraoperative blood loss by about 41.82 mL (95% CI: 25.81, 57.82, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

By combining laparoscopy with traditional vaginal surgery, vNOTES offers advantages such as shorter surgery times, faster postoperative recovery, reduced hospital stays, greater minimal invasiveness, and improved cosmetic outcomes. However, it is essential for surgeons to continually enhance and standardize preoperative assessments and surgical techniques to minimize conversion rates and reduce intraoperative blood loss.

Trial registry number

ChiCTR2200059282, China Clinical Trials Registry, April 28, 2022.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaccour C, Giannini A, Golia D’Auge T, Ayed A, Allahqoli L, Alkatout I, Lagana AS, Chiantera V, D’Oria O, Sleiman Z. Hysterectomy using Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery compared with Classic Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a new advantageous Approach? A systematic review on Surgical outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88(4):187–96.CrossRefPubMed Chaccour C, Giannini A, Golia D’Auge T, Ayed A, Allahqoli L, Alkatout I, Lagana AS, Chiantera V, D’Oria O, Sleiman Z. Hysterectomy using Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery compared with Classic Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a new advantageous Approach? A systematic review on Surgical outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88(4):187–96.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1091–5.CrossRefPubMed Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1091–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009(3):Cd003677. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009(3):Cd003677.
4.
go back to reference Stone R, Carey E, Fader AN, Fitzgerald J, Hammons L, Nensi A, Park AJ, Ricci S, Rosenfield R, Scheib S, et al. Enhanced Recovery and Surgical optimization protocol for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: an AAGL White Paper. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(2):179–203.CrossRefPubMed Stone R, Carey E, Fader AN, Fitzgerald J, Hammons L, Nensi A, Park AJ, Ricci S, Rosenfield R, Scheib S, et al. Enhanced Recovery and Surgical optimization protocol for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: an AAGL White Paper. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(2):179–203.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kalogera E, Glaser GE, Kumar A, Dowdy SC, Langstraat CL. Enhanced recovery after minimally invasive gynecologic procedures with bowel surgery: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(2):288–98.CrossRefPubMed Kalogera E, Glaser GE, Kumar A, Dowdy SC, Langstraat CL. Enhanced recovery after minimally invasive gynecologic procedures with bowel surgery: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(2):288–98.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zhang W, Deng L, Yang F, Liu J, Chen S, You X, Gou J, Zi D, Li Y, Qi X, et al. Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024;14(1):e074478.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang W, Deng L, Yang F, Liu J, Chen S, You X, Gou J, Zi D, Li Y, Qi X, et al. Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024;14(1):e074478.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Feng D, He L. Regarding transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(8):842.CrossRefPubMed Feng D, He L. Regarding transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(8):842.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1089–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1089–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Jallad K, Walters MD. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(2):324–9.CrossRefPubMed Jallad K, Walters MD. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(2):324–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lerner VT, May G, Iglesia CB. Vaginal natural orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery revolution: the Next Frontier in Gynecologic minimally invasive surgery. Jsls 2023, 27(1). Lerner VT, May G, Iglesia CB. Vaginal natural orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery revolution: the Next Frontier in Gynecologic minimally invasive surgery. Jsls 2023, 27(1).
11.
go back to reference Mereu L, Pecorino B, Ferrara M, Siniscalchi M, Garraffa G, D’Agate MG, Scollo P. Cumulative Sum analysis of learning curve process for Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(7):582–6.CrossRefPubMed Mereu L, Pecorino B, Ferrara M, Siniscalchi M, Garraffa G, D’Agate MG, Scollo P. Cumulative Sum analysis of learning curve process for Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(7):582–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Giannini A, D’Oria O, Bogani G, Di Donato V, Vizza E, Chiantera V, Lagana AS, Muzii L, Salerno MG, Caserta D et al. Hysterectomy: Let’s Step Up the Ladder of Evidence to Look Over the Horizon. J Clin Med 2022, 11(23). Giannini A, D’Oria O, Bogani G, Di Donato V, Vizza E, Chiantera V, Lagana AS, Muzii L, Salerno MG, Caserta D et al. Hysterectomy: Let’s Step Up the Ladder of Evidence to Look Over the Horizon. J Clin Med 2022, 11(23).
13.
go back to reference Li CB, Hua KQ. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(1):44–51.CrossRefPubMed Li CB, Hua KQ. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(1):44–51.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Housmans S, Noori N, Kapurubandara S, Bosteels JJA, Cattani L, Alkatout I, Deprest J, Baekelandt J. Systematic review and Meta-analysis on hysterectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy for Benign indications. J Clin Med 2020, 9(12). Housmans S, Noori N, Kapurubandara S, Bosteels JJA, Cattani L, Alkatout I, Deprest J, Baekelandt J. Systematic review and Meta-analysis on hysterectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy for Benign indications. J Clin Med 2020, 9(12).
15.
go back to reference Kim MS, Noh JJ, Kim TJ. Hysterectomy and Adnexal procedures by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNH): initial findings from a Korean surgeon. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:583147.CrossRefPubMed Kim MS, Noh JJ, Kim TJ. Hysterectomy and Adnexal procedures by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNH): initial findings from a Korean surgeon. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:583147.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zhang J, Dai Y, Leng J, Zhu L, Lang J, Sun D. Hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: the role of multichannel abdominal PORT and vaginal support ring. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(7):2521–8.CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Dai Y, Leng J, Zhu L, Lang J, Sun D. Hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: the role of multichannel abdominal PORT and vaginal support ring. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(7):2521–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hou Q, Li X, Li Y, Zhang Q, Liu T, Huang L, Gong Z, Feng D, Gu D, Lin Y, et al. Analysis and suggestions on the complications in 2000 cases of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: can it be a conventional surgery? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;164(2):541–9.CrossRefPubMed Hou Q, Li X, Li Y, Zhang Q, Liu T, Huang L, Gong Z, Feng D, Gu D, Lin Y, et al. Analysis and suggestions on the complications in 2000 cases of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: can it be a conventional surgery? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;164(2):541–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Huang L, He L, Huang L, Gan X, Lin Y, Xiong Z. Learning curve analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy combined under the standard operating procedure. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(3):689–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang L, He L, Huang L, Gan X, Lin Y, Xiong Z. Learning curve analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy combined under the standard operating procedure. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(3):689–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol B, Bosteels J. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019;126(1):105–13.CrossRefPubMed Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol B, Bosteels J. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019;126(1):105–13.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Xie A, Li X, Huang J, Wang H, Liu Y, Wang L, Liao J, Yu J, Yan Z, Zhang J, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for ovarian cystectomy: a more suitable surgical approach for the day-care procedure. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1164970.CrossRefPubMed Xie A, Li X, Huang J, Wang H, Liu Y, Wang L, Liao J, Yu J, Yan Z, Zhang J, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for ovarian cystectomy: a more suitable surgical approach for the day-care procedure. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1164970.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Liu Y, Li X, Liu T, Xie A, Wu X, Jia Y, Liao X, Cheng W, Wang H, Zhong F, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24945.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu Y, Li X, Liu T, Xie A, Wu X, Jia Y, Liao X, Cheng W, Wang H, Zhong F, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24945.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Cheng W, Li X, Liu T, Xie A, Wu X, Liao J, Liao X, Jia Y, Zhou X, Liu Y, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for myomectomy: a more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;295:143–9.CrossRefPubMed Cheng W, Li X, Liu T, Xie A, Wu X, Liao J, Liao X, Jia Y, Zhou X, Liu Y, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for myomectomy: a more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;295:143–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Li X, Liu T, Hou Q, Zeng X, Xiong Y, Yang Y, Li Z, Li Y, Lin Y, He L. Comparison of Prone with Lithotomy position in removal of posterior myoma in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Endoscopic surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024. Li X, Liu T, Hou Q, Zeng X, Xiong Y, Yang Y, Li Z, Li Y, Lin Y, He L. Comparison of Prone with Lithotomy position in removal of posterior myoma in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Endoscopic surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024.
24.
go back to reference Kaya C, Yıldız Ş, Alay İ, Aslan Ö, Aydıner İE, Yaşar L. The comparison of Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in obese patients. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(4):862–7.CrossRefPubMed Kaya C, Yıldız Ş, Alay İ, Aslan Ö, Aydıner İE, Yaşar L. The comparison of Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in obese patients. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(4):862–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Temtanakitpaisan T, Wu KY, Huang CY, Jaiswal A, Yen CF, Lee CL. The outcomes of transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy in various uterine sizes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57(6):842–5.CrossRefPubMed Temtanakitpaisan T, Wu KY, Huang CY, Jaiswal A, Yen CF, Lee CL. The outcomes of transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy in various uterine sizes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57(6):842–5.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Uccella S, Casarin J, Marconi N, Cromi A, Morosi C, Gisone B, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (≥ 1500 g): feasibility and outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):922–7.CrossRefPubMed Uccella S, Casarin J, Marconi N, Cromi A, Morosi C, Gisone B, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (≥ 1500 g): feasibility and outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):922–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Uccella S, Morosi C, Marconi N, Arrigo A, Gisone B, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Borghi C, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri weighing > 1 kg: a retrospective analysis on 258 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):62–9.CrossRefPubMed Uccella S, Morosi C, Marconi N, Arrigo A, Gisone B, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Borghi C, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri weighing > 1 kg: a retrospective analysis on 258 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):62–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hui M, Schwartzenburg C, Bhalwal A. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery for permanent sterilization after failed attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(10):1138–9.CrossRefPubMed Hui M, Schwartzenburg C, Bhalwal A. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery for permanent sterilization after failed attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(10):1138–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Guan X, Bardawil E, Liu J, Kho R. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery as a rescue for total vaginal hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(7):1135–6.CrossRefPubMed Guan X, Bardawil E, Liu J, Kho R. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery as a rescue for total vaginal hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(7):1135–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study
Authors
Xian Wu
Xin Li
Aijie Xie
Jia Liu
Tianjiao Liu
Yunyi Su
Ying Liu
Wei Cheng
Ying Jin
Lulu Wang
Yujian Jia
Jianmei Liao
Hui Wang
Xia Yu
Ling Zhang
Yalan Li
Li He
Yonghong Lin
Xiaoqin Gan
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Hysterectomy
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03461-w

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the broader systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.   

Prof. Martha Hickey
Dr. Claudia Barth
Dr. Samar El Khoudary
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now