Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Gastrectomy | Research

Comparison of proximal gastrectomy with tubular esophagogastric anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction of Siewert type II/III at stage II

Authors: Zhixing Zhang, Tiantian Zhao, Yixing Wang, Fei Xue, Yansong Pu, Qingguo Du, Yunhua Wu

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Tubular anastomosis is commonly used in proximal gastrectomy; however, its use in stage II esophagogastric conjugate cancer is currently unclear. In this study, we investigated the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after modified proximal gastrectomy with tubular esophagogastric anastomosis compared with total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Methods

We collected the clinical data of patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy tubular esophagogastric anastomosis (PG-TEA) and total gastrectomy Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TG-RY) from October 2015 to October 2018. The clinical characteristics, postoperative quality of life, nutritional status, and long-term survival outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results

There were 43 patients in the PG-TEA group and 80 patients in the TG-RY group, and there was no significant difference between the baseline data of the groups. The operation time of the PG-TEA group was shorter, there was less intraoperative bleeding, and the feeding time was earlier, which was conducive to postoperative recovery. Reflux esophagitis was more evident in the PG-TEA group than in the TG-RY group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic ulcers or other complications. Three months after surgery, the nutritional status of the PG-TEA group was better than the TG-RY group. By the 6th postoperative month, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Regarding quality of life, the PG-TEA group was superior to the TG-RY group in terms of diarrhea and dumping syndrome. In addition, the PG-TEA group had higher satisfaction with daily life and higher-quality meals. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups.

Conclusions

Proximal gastrectomy tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis is a surgical procedure for stage II Siewert type II and III AEG. It achieves similar clinical outcomes to those after total gastrectomy and can be further applied in the clinic.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):36–42.CrossRefPubMed Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):36–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Xiong HC, Wu N, Chen JF, Zhang LJ, Ji JF, Yang Y. [A clinical study of thoracic-abdominal double-incision and two-field lymphadenectomy in treatment of esophagogastric junction cancer]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;87(21):1478–81. Xiong HC, Wu N, Chen JF, Zhang LJ, Ji JF, Yang Y. [A clinical study of thoracic-abdominal double-incision and two-field lymphadenectomy in treatment of esophagogastric junction cancer]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;87(21):1478–81.
3.
go back to reference Jung MK, Schmidt T, Chon SH, et al. Current surgical treatment standards for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1482(1):77–84.CrossRefPubMed Jung MK, Schmidt T, Chon SH, et al. Current surgical treatment standards for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1482(1):77–84.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hayashi T, Yoshikawa T. Optimal surgery for esophagogastric junctional cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407(4):1399–407.CrossRefPubMed Hayashi T, Yoshikawa T. Optimal surgery for esophagogastric junctional cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407(4):1399–407.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sun K-K, Yong-You Wu. Current status of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy in proximal gastric cancer: technical details and oncologic outcomes. Asian J Surg. 2021;44(1):54–8.CrossRefPubMed Sun K-K, Yong-You Wu. Current status of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy in proximal gastric cancer: technical details and oncologic outcomes. Asian J Surg. 2021;44(1):54–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Li X, Gong S, Tingting Lu, et al. Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(6):1321–35.CrossRefPubMed Li X, Gong S, Tingting Lu, et al. Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(6):1321–35.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Li Li, Cai X, Liu Z, et al. Digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer. 2023;14(16):3139–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Li, Cai X, Liu Z, et al. Digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer. 2023;14(16):3139–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Liu BY, Wu S, Xu Y. Clinical efficacy and safety of double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis in gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;16(7):2012–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu BY, Wu S, Xu Y. Clinical efficacy and safety of double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis in gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;16(7):2012–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Li Li, Zheng-Hui L, Xu-Fan C, et al. Cardia function-preserving surgery and anti-reflux anastomotic method after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1000719.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Li, Zheng-Hui L, Xu-Fan C, et al. Cardia function-preserving surgery and anti-reflux anastomotic method after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1000719.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Li Z, Ma Y, Liu G, et al. Proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction or jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer: which offers better short-term surgical outcomes? BMC Surg. 2021;1:249.CrossRef Li Z, Ma Y, Liu G, et al. Proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction or jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer: which offers better short-term surgical outcomes? BMC Surg. 2021;1:249.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liu K, Zhu YF, Yang YS, et al. Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(2024 edition). Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024;27(2):127–31.PubMed Liu K, Zhu YF, Yang YS, et al. Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(2024 edition). Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024;27(2):127–31.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Tono C, Terashima M, Takagane A, Abe K. Ideal reconstruction after total gastrectomy by the interposition of a jejunal pouch considered by emptying time. World J Surg. 2003;27(10):1113–8. Tono C, Terashima M, Takagane A, Abe K. Ideal reconstruction after total gastrectomy by the interposition of a jejunal pouch considered by emptying time. World J Surg. 2003;27(10):1113–8.
14.
go back to reference Jain VK, Cunningham D, Chau I. Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(1):99–112.CrossRefPubMed Jain VK, Cunningham D, Chau I. Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(1):99–112.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bolliger M, Kroehnert J-A, Molineus F, et al. Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients. Eur Surg. 2018;50(6):256–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bolliger M, Kroehnert J-A, Molineus F, et al. Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients. Eur Surg. 2018;50(6):256–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(2):407–16.CrossRefPubMed Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(2):407–16.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, et al. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):587–91.CrossRefPubMed An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, et al. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):587–91.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shen C, Yang H, Zhang B, Chen H, Chen Z, Chen J. Improved quality of life in patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after gastric tube reconstruction. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60(128):1985–9. Shen C, Yang H, Zhang B, Chen H, Chen Z, Chen J. Improved quality of life in patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after gastric tube reconstruction. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60(128):1985–9.
19.
go back to reference Sakamoto T, Fujimaki M, Tazawa K. Ileocolon interposition as a substitute stomach after total or proximal gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 1997;226(2):139–45. Sakamoto T, Fujimaki M, Tazawa K. Ileocolon interposition as a substitute stomach after total or proximal gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 1997;226(2):139–45.
20.
go back to reference Chen J, Wang F, Gao S, et al. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction. BMC Surg. 2023;23(1):309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen J, Wang F, Gao S, et al. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction. BMC Surg. 2023;23(1):309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Tanioka T, Waratchanont R, Fukuyo R, et al. Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1061–9.CrossRefPubMed Tanioka T, Waratchanont R, Fukuyo R, et al. Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1061–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chen Y, Zhao XK, Xu RH, et al. Transthoracic, thoracoabdominal, and transabdominal surgical approaches for gastric cardia adenocarcinomas: a survival evaluation based on a cohort of 7103 patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen Y, Zhao XK, Xu RH, et al. Transthoracic, thoracoabdominal, and transabdominal surgical approaches for gastric cardia adenocarcinomas: a survival evaluation based on a cohort of 7103 patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Liu K, Zhu YF, Yang YS, Chen LQ, Hu JK. [Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(2024 edition)]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024;27(2):127–31. Liu K, Zhu YF, Yang YS, Chen LQ, Hu JK. [Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(2024 edition)]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024;27(2):127–31.
25.
go back to reference Oh SE, Lee GH, An JY, et al. Comparison of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches in the treatment of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction cancers: a propensity score-matching analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022;48(2):370–6.CrossRefPubMed Oh SE, Lee GH, An JY, et al. Comparison of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches in the treatment of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction cancers: a propensity score-matching analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022;48(2):370–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Zheng H, Yin X, Pan T, et al. Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):1130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zheng H, Yin X, Pan T, et al. Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):1130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Xing J, Liu M, Kai Xu, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes following transhiatal versus right thoracoabdominal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:11813–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xing J, Liu M, Kai Xu, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes following transhiatal versus right thoracoabdominal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:11813–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Tian Y, Lv H, Wang M, et al. A retrospective analysis of lymph node dissection in Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19(1):460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tian Y, Lv H, Wang M, et al. A retrospective analysis of lymph node dissection in Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19(1):460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Inada T, Yoshida M, Ikeda M, et al. Evaluation of QOL after Proximal Gastrectomy Using a Newly Developed Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45). World J Surg. 2014;38(12):3152–62.CrossRefPubMed Inada T, Yoshida M, Ikeda M, et al. Evaluation of QOL after Proximal Gastrectomy Using a Newly Developed Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45). World J Surg. 2014;38(12):3152–62.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of proximal gastrectomy with tubular esophagogastric anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction of Siewert type II/III at stage II
Authors
Zhixing Zhang
Tiantian Zhao
Yixing Wang
Fei Xue
Yansong Pu
Qingguo Du
Yunhua Wu
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02685-9
SPONSORED

Mastering chronic pancreatitis pain: A multidisciplinary approach and practical solutions

  • Webinar | 06-02-2024 | 20:00 (CET)

Severe pain is the most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis. In this webinar, experts share the latest insights in pain management for chronic pancreatitis patients. Experts from a range of disciplines discuss pertinent cases and provide practical suggestions for use within clinical practice.

Sponsored by:
  • Viatris
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now