Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Ophthalmology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
ASH 2024 Annual Meeting 2024 ESMO Congress 2024 ERS Congress 2024 EASD Congress 2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

LIVE: Wednesday 29th January, 18:00-19:30 CET

Growing numbers of young people are using e-cigarettes, despite warnings of respiratory effects and addiction. How can doctors tackle the epidemic, and what health effects should you prepare to manage in your clinics?
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

Open Access 04-01-2025 | Research Article

Fostering moral reflectivity in community pharmacists through moral case deliberation using the dilemma method

Authors: M. Kruijtbosch, A. Floor-Schreudering, E. van Leeuwen, M. L. Bouvy

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Moral case deliberation has been successfully implemented in multidisciplinary groups of secondary care professionals to support ethical decision making. It has not yet been reported for community pharmacists.

Aim

This study investigated whether moral case deliberation fosters moral reflectivity in community pharmacists.

Method

Two moral case deliberations with 14 community pharmacists were guided by two facilitators. One session was described and illustrated with participants’ quotes, detailing each reflection step of the method. An adapted version of the Maastricht evaluation questionnaire was used to understand the effects of the moral case deliberation on participants’ moral reflectivity skills both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results

In a 2-h session, pharmacists reflected on a moral dilemma concerning double anticoagulant therapy of one presenter pharmacist. Participants discussed the pros and cons of two potential actions: dispensing the medication as prescribed without contacting the patient or contacting the patient first. Deliberation highlighted the importance of understanding the patient’s perspective, leading the presenter and two others to shift towards the latter action.
The evaluation questionnaire revealed that all 14 participants felt supported by the deliberation and the facilitator in recognising the dilemma’s moral dimension and understanding their own and others’ values behind arguments and how these influenced different perspectives. They all felt encouraged to critically reflect, to ask open questions and to delay judgements. The method helped all to morally justify their final decision, with six participants arriving at a decision different from their initial perspective towards the dilemma’s resolution.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that moral case deliberation enables pharmacists to critically examine their reasoning and reach morally sound resolutions, supporting pharmacists’ professionalism and ethical decision-making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Kälvemark S, Höglund AT, Hansson MG, et al. Living with conflicts-ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1075–84.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Sporrong SK, Höglund AT, Hansson MG, et al. “We are White Coats Whirling Round”– moral distress in Swedish pharmacies. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27:223–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Molewijk AC, Abma T, Stolper M, et al. Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:120–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kruijtbosch M, Göttgens-Jansen W, Floor-Schreudering A, et al. Moral dilemmas of community pharmacists: a narrative study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018;40:74–83.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Inguaggiato G, Metselaar S, Molewijk B, et al. How moral case deliberation supports good clinical decision making. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21:913–9.CrossRef
6.
Dauwerse L, Stolper M, Widdershoven G, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of moral case deliberation in Dutch health care. Med Health Care Philos. 2014;17:365–75.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Rasoal D, Skovdahl K, Gifford M, et al. Clinical ethics support for healthcare personnel: an integrative literature review. HEC Forum. 2017;29:313–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
9.
Weidema FC, Molewijk BA, Kamsteeg F, et al. Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20:617–31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Stolper M, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G. Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17:45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Janssens RM, Van Zadelhoff E, Van Loo G, et al. Evaluation and perceived results of moral case deliberation: a mixed methods study. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22:870–80.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Molewijk B, Zadelhoff EV, Lendemeijer B, et al. Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care; improving moral competency of professionals and the quality of care. Bioethica Forum. 2008;1:57–65.
13.
Van der Dam S, Schols JM, Kardol TJ, et al. The discovery of deliberation. From ambiguity to appreciation through the learning process of doing moral case deliberation in dutch elderly care. Soc Sci Med. 2013;83:125–32.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Spijkerboer RP, Van der Stel JC, Widdershoven GAM, et al. Does moral case deliberation help professionals in Care for the Homeless in dealing with their dilemmas? A mixed-methods responsive study. HEC Forum. 2017;29:21–41.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Svantesson M, Karlsson J, Boitte P, et al. Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
de Snoo-Trimp JC, Molewijk B, Ursin G, et al. Field-testing the euro-MCD instrument: experienced outcomes of moral case deliberation. Nurs Ethics. 2019;27(2):390–406.CrossRefPubMed
17.
de Snoo-Trimp JC, Molewijk B, de Vet HCW. Defining and categorizing outcomes of moral case deliberation (MCD): concept mapping with experienced MCD participants. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19:88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Bolt I, van den Hoven M, Blom L, et al. To dispense or not to dispense? Ethical case decision-making in pharmacy practice. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37:978–81.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Allinson MD, Black P. Students views of an online ethical decision-support tool. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10:226–30.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Casey D, Houghton C. Clarifying case study research: examples from practice. Nurse Res. 2010;17:41–51.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2018.
22.
Koster ES, Blom L, Philbert D, et al. The Utrecht pharmacy practice network for education and research: a network of community and hospital pharmacies in the Netherlands. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36:669–74.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Stolper M, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G. Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitator of moral case deliberation. HEC Forum. 2015;27:47–59.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Inguaggiato G, Metselaar S, Porz R, et al. A pragmatist approach to clinical ethics support: overcoming the perils of ethical pluralism. Med Health Care Philos. 2019;22:427–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Kruijtbosch M, Göttgens-Jansen W, Floor-Schreudering A, et al. Moral dilemmas reflect professional core values of pharmacists in community pharmacy. Int J Pharm Pract. 2019;27:140–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–51.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Mackenzie N, Knipe S. Research dilemmas: paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues Educ Res. 2006;16:193–205.
28.
de Snoo-Trimp JC, de Vet HCW, Widdershoven GAM, et al. Moral competence, moral teamwork and moral action - the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes (Euro-MCD) Instrument 2.0 and its revision process. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Molewijk B, Kleinlugtenbelt D, Widdershoven G. The role of emotions in moral case deliberation: theory, practice, and methodology. Bioethics. 2011;25:383–93.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13:544–59.
31.
Westein MPD, de Vries H, Floor A, et al. Development of a postgraduate community pharmacist specialization program using CanMEDS competencies, and entrustable professional activities. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(6):6863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Koster AS, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Woerdenbag HJ, et al. Alignment of CanMEDS-based undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy curricula in The Netherlands. Pharmacy (Basel). 2020;8(3):117.CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Dee J, Dhuhaibawi N, Hayden JC. A systematic review and pooled prevalence of burnout in pharmacists. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023;45(5):1027–36.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fostering moral reflectivity in community pharmacists through moral case deliberation using the dilemma method
Authors
M. Kruijtbosch
A. Floor-Schreudering
E. van Leeuwen
M. L. Bouvy
Publication date
04-01-2025
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01854-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the broader systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.   

Prof. Martha Hickey
Dr. Claudia Barth
Dr. Samar El Khoudary
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

  • Live
  • Webinar | 29-01-2025 | 18:00 (CET)

Growing numbers of young people are using e-cigarettes, despite warnings of respiratory effects and addiction. How can doctors tackle the epidemic, and what health effects should you prepare to manage in your clinics?

Watch it live: Wednesday 29th January, 18:00-19:30 CET
 

Prof. Ann McNeill
Dr. Debbie Robson
Benji Horwell
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Join the webinar

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on modern management of frailty

Frailty has a significant impact on health and wellbeing, especially in older adults. Our experts explain the factors that contribute to the development of frailty and how you can manage the condition and reduce the risk of disability, dependency, and mortality in your patients.

Prof. Alfonso Cruz-Jentoft
Prof. Barbara C. van Munster
Prof. Mirko Petrovic
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now

A quick guide to ECGs

Improve your ECG interpretation skills with this comprehensive, rapid, interactive course. Expert advice provides detailed feedback as you work through 50 ECGs covering the most common cardiac presentations to ensure your practice stays up to date. 

PD Dr. Carsten W. Israel
Developed by: Springer Medizin
Start the cases

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Read more
Image Credits