Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Feeling valued at work: a qualitative exploration of allied health profession support workers

Authors: Abigail J. Hall, Victoria A. Goodwin, Lorraine Allchurch, Luke Capon, Vicky Farrell, Oludare Olufunmilayo, Richard Griffin

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to explore Allied Health Professions (AHP) support worker perceptions of feeling valued and to understand what factors contribute to this feeling of “value”.

Design

This was a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews undertaken virtually. The data were analysed using a process of thematic analysis in order to gain an in depth understanding of the factors that affect support workers feeling “valued”.

Setting and participants

Twenty-nine AHP support workers were recruited. They had a wide range of characteristics and experience in a variety of different settings and working with different professions. Participants all had experience of working in England and data collection was undertaken during February and March 2024.

Results

A sense of belonging, recognition for their skills and abilities, empowerment within their role, as well as opportunities to develop, were seen as key factors contributing to their feeling of value. Where support workers did not feel valued, they often referred to themselves as “just a support worker” and their skills and abilities were not fully utilised. Where support workers did feel valued, they thrived in their roles and enjoyed the opportunities that the role afforded them. There was significant variation in how valued our support workers felt which had a clear impact on them as people, but also would influence the care that they delivered.

Conclusion

AHP support workers are an integral part of the workforce, occupy diverse roles in healthcare and work collaboratively with registered staff, often prioritising patient care over their own career development and ambition. Recognising, empowering, and including them in teams is crucial for a supportive environment. Acknowledging their skills, providing learning opportunities, and supporting their development is essential for their well-being and fostering inclusivity in healthcare. By valuing and nurturing AHP support workers, we improve patient care and build a stronger healthcare workforce.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference NHS England. NHS Long Term Workforce Plan. 2023. NHS England. NHS Long Term Workforce Plan. 2023.
2.
go back to reference NHS England. The NHS long term plan. NHS England: UK; 2019. NHS England. The NHS long term plan. NHS England: UK; 2019.
3.
go back to reference NHS England. AHP Support Worker Competency, Education and Career Development Framework. 2021. NHS England. AHP Support Worker Competency, Education and Career Development Framework. 2021.
4.
go back to reference Cavendish C. The Cavendish Review: An Independent Review into Healthcare Assistants and Support Workers in the NHS and social care setting. 2013. Cavendish C. The Cavendish Review: An Independent Review into Healthcare Assistants and Support Workers in the NHS and social care setting. 2013.
5.
go back to reference Kessler IBSNV. Talent for Care: An evaluation. 2016. Kessler IBSNV. Talent for Care: An evaluation. 2016.
6.
go back to reference Lovegrove M, Davis J. The current and potential contribution of allied health support workers to public health. 2017. Lovegrove M, Davis J. The current and potential contribution of allied health support workers to public health. 2017.
7.
go back to reference NHS England. A new community rehabilitation and reablement model. Good practice guidance for integrated care boards (commissioners and providers). 2023. NHS England. A new community rehabilitation and reablement model. Good practice guidance for integrated care boards (commissioners and providers). 2023.
8.
go back to reference NHS England. Intermediate care framework for rehabilitation, reablement and recovery following hospital discharge. 2023. NHS England. Intermediate care framework for rehabilitation, reablement and recovery following hospital discharge. 2023.
9.
go back to reference Landy FJ, Conte JM. Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken: New Jersey; 2016. Landy FJ, Conte JM. Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken: New Jersey; 2016.
10.
go back to reference Nancarrow SA, Shuttleworth P, Tongue A, Brown L. Support workers in intermediate care. Health Soc Care Commun. 2005;13(4):338–44.CrossRef Nancarrow SA, Shuttleworth P, Tongue A, Brown L. Support workers in intermediate care. Health Soc Care Commun. 2005;13(4):338–44.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Maslach C, Leiter MP, Stress. Concepts, cognition, emotion, and Behavior. Cambridge: Academic; 2016. pp. 351–7. Maslach C, Leiter MP, Stress. Concepts, cognition, emotion, and Behavior. Cambridge: Academic; 2016. pp. 351–7.
12.
go back to reference Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.CrossRefPubMed Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology: Practical Guide Res Methods. 2015;3:222–48. Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology: Practical Guide Res Methods. 2015;3:222–48.
14.
go back to reference Maslow A, Lewis K. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Salenger Incorporated. 1987;14(17):987–90. Maslow A, Lewis K. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Salenger Incorporated. 1987;14(17):987–90.
15.
go back to reference Kessler I, Bosa S, Nutland W. Talent for care: an evaluation. Health Education England: UK; 2016. Kessler I, Bosa S, Nutland W. Talent for care: an evaluation. Health Education England: UK; 2016.
16.
go back to reference Sarigiovannis P, Jowett S, Saunders B, Corp N, Bishop A. Delegation by Allied Health Professionals To Allied Health Assistants: a mixed methods systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2021;112:16–30.CrossRefPubMed Sarigiovannis P, Jowett S, Saunders B, Corp N, Bishop A. Delegation by Allied Health Professionals To Allied Health Assistants: a mixed methods systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2021;112:16–30.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lester H, Tritter J. Mixed feelings about mixed funding: Health, Welfare and Professional boundaries in Collaborative Care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005. Lester H, Tritter J. Mixed feelings about mixed funding: Health, Welfare and Professional boundaries in Collaborative Care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.
18.
go back to reference Charles J, Roberts J, Din N, Williams N, Yeo ST, Edwards R. Preferences of older patients regarding hip fracture rehabilitation service configuration: a feasibility discrete choice experiment. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(7):636–42.CrossRefPubMed Charles J, Roberts J, Din N, Williams N, Yeo ST, Edwards R. Preferences of older patients regarding hip fracture rehabilitation service configuration: a feasibility discrete choice experiment. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(7):636–42.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference MacLeod D, Clarke N. Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement: a report to government. 2009. MacLeod D, Clarke N. Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement: a report to government. 2009.
Metadata
Title
Feeling valued at work: a qualitative exploration of allied health profession support workers
Authors
Abigail J. Hall
Victoria A. Goodwin
Lorraine Allchurch
Luke Capon
Vicky Farrell
Oludare Olufunmilayo
Richard Griffin
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11879-z