Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 06-09-2024 | Fecal Incontinence | Original Article

Urgency an important factor when assessing fecal incontinence

Authors: Louise Almkvist, Ulf Gunnarsson, Karin Strigård

Published in: Updates in Surgery

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate if Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score contributed with complementary information to Wexner score when assessing fecal incontinence (FI). The hypothesis was that LARS score would be likely to provide complementary information to Wexner score in the assessment of FI regardless of etiology. LARS score has been used as a complement to traditional scoring systems to assess bowel dysfunction, targeting FI among patients after radical cystectomy, in women with endometriosis, and in colorectal cancer patients. Wexner score as a single tool does not address the complexity of FI and urgency, a disabling symptom. A retrospective cohort study at a surgical outpatient clinic included patients diagnosed with FI who answered LARS and Wexner scores questionnaires at their first visit to the clinic between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2018. Kendall’s tau, Spearman rank correlation, Cohen’s kappa, and scatterplots were analyzed for participants and specific subgroups to assess any correlation and agreement between answers to the two scoring systems. One hundred nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria, one hundred eight women and eleven men. Kendall’s tau ranged from 0.32 to 0.39, indicating lack of correlation. Correlation coefficients using Spearman rank ranged from 0.36 to 0.55, i.e., only fair to moderate correlation. Kappa was 0.21–0.28, i.e., only slight to fair agreement. Distribution of LARS and Wexner scores in the scatterplot showed wide variability and lack of agreement. Combined use of both the Wexner and LARS scores provided complimentary information, and thus a more complete mapping of FI as well as taking all entities in consideration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S et al (2005) Incontinence. Health Publications, Plymouth, p 70 Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S et al (2005) Incontinence. Health Publications, Plymouth, p 70
2.
go back to reference Marcio J, Jorge N, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and Management of Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRef Marcio J, Jorge N, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and Management of Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sharma A, Yuan L, Marshall RJ et al (2016) Systematic review of the prevalence of faecal incontinence. BJS 103:1589–1597CrossRef Sharma A, Yuan L, Marshall RJ et al (2016) Systematic review of the prevalence of faecal incontinence. BJS 103:1589–1597CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Meijerink WJ et al (2001) What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 44:67–71CrossRefPubMed Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Meijerink WJ et al (2001) What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 44:67–71CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES et al (1998) Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. BJS 85:1716–1719CrossRef Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES et al (1998) Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. BJS 85:1716–1719CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Alsheik EH, Coyne T, Hawes SK et al (2012) Fecal incontinence: prevalence, severity, and quality of life data from an outpatient gastroenterology practice. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:1–7CrossRef Alsheik EH, Coyne T, Hawes SK et al (2012) Fecal incontinence: prevalence, severity, and quality of life data from an outpatient gastroenterology practice. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:1–7CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91:33–36PubMed Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91:33–36PubMed
8.
go back to reference Leigh RJ, Turnberg LA (1982) Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet 319(8285):1349–51CrossRef Leigh RJ, Turnberg LA (1982) Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet 319(8285):1349–51CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Macmillan AK, Merrie AEH, Marshall RJ et al (2004) The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1341–1349CrossRefPubMed Macmillan AK, Merrie AEH, Marshall RJ et al (2004) The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1341–1349CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pretlove SJ, Radley S, Toozs-Hobson PM, Thompson PJ, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS (2006) Prevalence of anal incontinence according to age and gender: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Int Urogynecol J 17:407–17CrossRef Pretlove SJ, Radley S, Toozs-Hobson PM, Thompson PJ, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS (2006) Prevalence of anal incontinence according to age and gender: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Int Urogynecol J 17:407–17CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Assmann SL, Keszthelyi D, Kleijnen J et al (2022) Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration. United European Gastroenterol J 10(3):251–286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Assmann SL, Keszthelyi D, Kleijnen J et al (2022) Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration. United European Gastroenterol J 10(3):251–286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Ruiz NS, Kaiser AM (2017) Fecal incontinence—Challenges and solutions. World J Gastroenterol 23(1):11–24CrossRef Ruiz NS, Kaiser AM (2017) Fecal incontinence—Challenges and solutions. World J Gastroenterol 23(1):11–24CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Malcolm A et al (2016) Anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 150(6):1430-1442.e4CrossRef Malcolm A et al (2016) Anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 150(6):1430-1442.e4CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pahwa AK, Khanijow KD, Harvie HS, Arya LA, Andy UU (2020) Comparison of patient impact and clinical characteristics between urgency and passive fecal incontinence phenotypes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 26(9):570–574CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pahwa AK, Khanijow KD, Harvie HS, Arya LA, Andy UU (2020) Comparison of patient impact and clinical characteristics between urgency and passive fecal incontinence phenotypes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 26(9):570–574CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Rusavy Z, Jansova M, Kalis V (2014) Anal incontinence severity assessment tools used worldwide. Int J of Gynecol Obstet 126:146–150CrossRef Rusavy Z, Jansova M, Kalis V (2014) Anal incontinence severity assessment tools used worldwide. Int J of Gynecol Obstet 126:146–150CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928CrossRefPubMed Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Liedberg F, Hagberg O, Baseckas G et al (2022) Anorectal dysfunction after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Scand J Urol 12:1–7 Liedberg F, Hagberg O, Baseckas G et al (2022) Anorectal dysfunction after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Scand J Urol 12:1–7
18.
go back to reference Scheepers WFW, Maas JWM, van de Kar MMA (2021) Bowel function and quality of life following surgery for deep endometriosis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 26:1–6 Scheepers WFW, Maas JWM, van de Kar MMA (2021) Bowel function and quality of life following surgery for deep endometriosis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 26:1–6
19.
go back to reference Sandberg S, Park J, Tasselius V, Angenete E. Abstract - Tarmfunktion efter kirurgi för koloncancer, en prospektiv multicenterstudie. 2023. I Kirurgveckan Örebro 2023, Örebro, Sweden 21–25 2023 August. Sandberg S, Park J, Tasselius V, Angenete E. Abstract - Tarmfunktion efter kirurgi för koloncancer, en prospektiv multicenterstudie. 2023. I Kirurgveckan Örebro 2023, Örebro, Sweden 21–25 2023 August.
20.
go back to reference van Heinsbergen M, den Haan N, Maaskant-Braat AJ et al (2020) Functional bowel complaints and quality of life after surgery for colon cancer: prevalence and predictive factors. Colorectal Dis 22(2):136–145CrossRefPubMed van Heinsbergen M, den Haan N, Maaskant-Braat AJ et al (2020) Functional bowel complaints and quality of life after surgery for colon cancer: prevalence and predictive factors. Colorectal Dis 22(2):136–145CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Juul T, Elfeki H, Christensen P et al (2019) Normative data for the low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS Score). Ann Surg 269(6):1124–1128CrossRefPubMed Juul T, Elfeki H, Christensen P et al (2019) Normative data for the low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS Score). Ann Surg 269(6):1124–1128CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 4(10):e296CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 4(10):e296CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG et al (2005) The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48(7):1353–1365CrossRefPubMed Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG et al (2005) The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48(7):1353–1365CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Quezada-Diaz FF, Elfeki H, Emmertsen KJ et al (2021) Comparative analysis of the memorial Sloan Kettering bowel function instrument and the low anterior resection syndrome questionnaire for assessment of bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer patients after low anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 23(2):451–460CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Quezada-Diaz FF, Elfeki H, Emmertsen KJ et al (2021) Comparative analysis of the memorial Sloan Kettering bowel function instrument and the low anterior resection syndrome questionnaire for assessment of bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer patients after low anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 23(2):451–460CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou LG, Christensen P, Basany EE, Laurberg S, Mellgren A, Messick C, Orangio GR, Verjee A, Wing K, Bissett I, LARS International Collaborative Group (2020) International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 63(3):274–284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou LG, Christensen P, Basany EE, Laurberg S, Mellgren A, Messick C, Orangio GR, Verjee A, Wing K, Bissett I, LARS International Collaborative Group (2020) International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 63(3):274–284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Capéraà P, Genest C (1993) Spearman’s ρ is larger than kendall’s τ for positively dependent random variables. J Nonparametric Statistics 2(2):183–194CrossRef Capéraà P, Genest C (1993) Spearman’s ρ is larger than kendall’s τ for positively dependent random variables. J Nonparametric Statistics 2(2):183–194CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singap Med J 44(12):614–619 Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singap Med J 44(12):614–619
33.
go back to reference Keane C, Wells C, O’Grady G et al (2017) Defining low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 19:713–722CrossRefPubMed Keane C, Wells C, O’Grady G et al (2017) Defining low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 19:713–722CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Urgency an important factor when assessing fecal incontinence
Authors
Louise Almkvist
Ulf Gunnarsson
Karin Strigård
Publication date
06-09-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01975-4
SPONSORED

Mastering chronic pancreatitis pain: A multidisciplinary approach and practical solutions

  • Webinar | 06-02-2024 | 20:00 (CET)

Severe pain is the most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis. In this webinar, experts share the latest insights in pain management for chronic pancreatitis patients. Experts from a range of disciplines discuss pertinent cases and provide practical suggestions for use within clinical practice.

Sponsored by:
  • Viatris
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now