Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Study protocol

Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial

Authors: Amy McMahon, Stephen Kaptoge, Matthew Walker, Susan Mehenny, Philippe T Gilchrist, Jennifer Sambrook, Naim Akhtar, Michael Sweeting, Angela M Wood, Kathleen Stirrups, Ryan Chung, Sarah Fahle, Elisha Johnson, Donna Cullen, Rosemary Godfrey, Shannon Duthie, Louise Allen, Paul Harvey, Michael Berkson, Elizabeth Allen, Nicholas A Watkins, John R Bradley, Nathalie Kingston, Gail Miflin, Jane Armitage, David J Roberts, John Danesh, Emanuele Di Angelantonio

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted different strategies to prevent VVRs (including water loading and applied muscle tension [AMT]), robust evidence is limited. The Strategies to Improve Donor Experiences (STRIDES) trial aims to reliably assess the impact of four different interventions to prevent VVRs among blood donors.

Methods

STRIDES is a cluster-randomised cross-over/stepped-wedge factorial trial of four interventions to reduce VVRs involving about 1.4 million whole blood donors enrolled from all 73 blood donation sites (mobile teams and donor centres) of National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) in England. Each site (“cluster”) has been randomly allocated to receive one or more interventions during a 36-month period, using principles of cross-over, stepped-wedge and factorial trial design to assign the sequence of interventions. Each of the four interventions is compared to NHSBT’s current practices: (i) 500-ml isotonic drink before donation (vs current 500-ml plain water); (ii) 3-min rest on donation chair after donation (vs current 2 min); (iii) new modified AMT (vs current practice of AMT); and (iv) psychosocial intervention using preparatory materials (vs current practice of nothing). The primary outcome is the number of in-session VVRs with loss of consciousness (i.e. episodes involving loss of consciousness of any duration, with or without additional complications). Secondary outcomes include all in-session VVRs (i.e. with and without loss of consciousness), all delayed VVRs (i.e. those occurring after leaving the venue) and any in-session non-VVR adverse events or reactions.

Discussion

The STRIDES trial should yield novel information about interventions, singly and in combination, for the prevention of VVRs, with the aim of generating policy-shaping evidence to help inform blood services to improve donor health, donor experience, and service efficiency.

Trial registration

ISRCTN: 10412338. Registration date: October 24, 2019.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meade MA, France CR, Peterson LM. Predicting vasovagal reactions in volunteer blood donors. J Psychosom Res. 1996;40(5):495–501.CrossRefPubMed Meade MA, France CR, Peterson LM. Predicting vasovagal reactions in volunteer blood donors. J Psychosom Res. 1996;40(5):495–501.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference France CR, Ditto B, France JL, Himawan LK. Psychometric properties of the Blood Donation Reactions Inventory: a subjective measure of presyncopal reactions to blood donation. Transfusion. 2008;48(9):1820–6.CrossRefPubMed France CR, Ditto B, France JL, Himawan LK. Psychometric properties of the Blood Donation Reactions Inventory: a subjective measure of presyncopal reactions to blood donation. Transfusion. 2008;48(9):1820–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Graham DT, Kabler JD, Lunsford L. Vasovagal fainting: a diphasic response. Psychosom Med. 1961;23:493–507.CrossRefPubMed Graham DT, Kabler JD, Lunsford L. Vasovagal fainting: a diphasic response. Psychosom Med. 1961;23:493–507.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference France CR, Rader A, Carlson B. Donors who react may not come back: Analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactions. Transfusion Apheresis Sci. 2005;33(2):99–106.CrossRef France CR, Rader A, Carlson B. Donors who react may not come back: Analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactions. Transfusion Apheresis Sci. 2005;33(2):99–106.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rader AW, France CR, Carlson B. Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections. Transfusion (Paris). 2007;47(6):995–1001.CrossRef Rader AW, France CR, Carlson B. Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections. Transfusion (Paris). 2007;47(6):995–1001.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J. 2009;30(21):2631–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J. 2009;30(21):2631–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Fisher SA, Allen D, Dorée C, Naylor J, Di Angelantonio E, Roberts DJ. Interventions to reduce vasovagal reactions in blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfusion Med. 2016;26(1):15–33.CrossRef Fisher SA, Allen D, Dorée C, Naylor J, Di Angelantonio E, Roberts DJ. Interventions to reduce vasovagal reactions in blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfusion Med. 2016;26(1):15–33.CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Morand C, Coudurier N, Rolland C, Thoret S, Legrand D, Tiberghien P, et al. Prevention of syncopal-type reactions after whole blood donation: a cluster-randomized trial assessing hydration and muscle tension exercise. 2016;56(10):2412-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.13716. Morand C, Coudurier N, Rolland C, Thoret S, Legrand D, Tiberghien P, et al. Prevention of syncopal-type reactions after whole blood donation: a cluster-randomized trial assessing hydration and muscle tension exercise. 2016;56(10):2412-242. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​trf.​13716.
20.
go back to reference Kumar K, Sachdev S, Marwaha N, Ratti, Sharma R. Role of salt supplementation on vasovagal reactions in young whole blood donors. ISBT Sci Ser. 2020;15:253–60.CrossRef Kumar K, Sachdev S, Marwaha N, Ratti, Sharma R. Role of salt supplementation on vasovagal reactions in young whole blood donors. ISBT Sci Ser. 2020;15:253–60.CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference France CR, France JL, Kowalsky JM, Conatser R, Duffy L, Barnofsky N, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tablet-based intervention to address predonation fears among high school donors. Transfusion (Paris). 2020;60(7):1450–3.CrossRef France CR, France JL, Kowalsky JM, Conatser R, Duffy L, Barnofsky N, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tablet-based intervention to address predonation fears among high school donors. Transfusion (Paris). 2020;60(7):1450–3.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weijer C, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, McRae AD, White A, Brehaut JC, et al. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11). Weijer C, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, McRae AD, White A, Brehaut JC, et al. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11).
26.
go back to reference Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential Treatment Assignment with Balancing for Prognostic Factors in the Controlled Clinical. Trial. 1975;31(1):103–15. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential Treatment Assignment with Balancing for Prognostic Factors in the Controlled Clinical. Trial. 1975;31(1):103–15.
27.
go back to reference Sismanidis C, Moulton LH, Ayles H, Fielding K, Schaap A, Beyers N, et al. Restricted randomization of ZAMSTAR: A 2 × 2 factorial cluster randomized trial. Clin Trials. 2008;5(4):316–27.CrossRefPubMed Sismanidis C, Moulton LH, Ayles H, Fielding K, Schaap A, Beyers N, et al. Restricted randomization of ZAMSTAR: A 2 × 2 factorial cluster randomized trial. Clin Trials. 2008;5(4):316–27.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bell S, Sweeting M, Ramond A, Chung R, Kaptoge S, Walker M, et al. Comparison of four methods to measure haemoglobin concentrations in whole blood donors (COMPARE): a diagnostic accuracy study. Transfusion Medicine. 2021;31(2):94–103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12750. Accessed 25 Oct 2022. Bell S, Sweeting M, Ramond A, Chung R, Kaptoge S, Walker M, et al. Comparison of four methods to measure haemoglobin concentrations in whole blood donors (COMPARE): a diagnostic accuracy study. Transfusion Medicine. 2021;31(2):94–103. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​tme.​12750. Accessed 25 Oct 2022.
30.
go back to reference Moore C, Sambrook J, Walker M, Tolkien Z, Kaptoge S, Allen D, et al. The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15(1). Moore C, Sambrook J, Walker M, Tolkien Z, Kaptoge S, Allen D, et al. The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15(1).
31.
go back to reference Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Moore C, Walker M, Armitage J, Ouwehand WH, et al. Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors. The Lancet Haemotology. 2019.6(10):e510–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30106-1. Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Moore C, Walker M, Armitage J, Ouwehand WH, et al. Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors. The Lancet Haemotology. 2019.6(10):e510–20. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S2352-3026(19)30106-1.
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
Authors
Amy McMahon
Stephen Kaptoge
Matthew Walker
Susan Mehenny
Philippe T Gilchrist
Jennifer Sambrook
Naim Akhtar
Michael Sweeting
Angela M Wood
Kathleen Stirrups
Ryan Chung
Sarah Fahle
Elisha Johnson
Donna Cullen
Rosemary Godfrey
Shannon Duthie
Louise Allen
Paul Harvey
Michael Berkson
Elizabeth Allen
Nicholas A Watkins
John R Bradley
Nathalie Kingston
Gail Miflin
Jane Armitage
David J Roberts
John Danesh
Emanuele Di Angelantonio
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Trials 1/2023 Go to the issue